0
   

usage of the "in" prefix

 
 
dalpets
 
Reply Wed 3 Apr, 2013 06:54 am
With the meanings of ingrate (n) & ingratiate(vt) we have the opposite usage of the "in" prefix for the same root. In the case of "ingrate" it is used as a qualifying negative (ungrateful) but when used with "ingratiate", the verbal form of the same root, it is used as a positive qualifier.

Logic would suggest that a person who ingratiates himself/herself would be an ingrate, ie., for the same root, but obviously that is not so.

Is this use of a prefix a rarity in the english language for given roots? I am hard pressed to find a similar apparent anomoly between specific verb & noun forms. Can you provide any other examples?
Thanks
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Question • Score: 0 • Views: 710 • Replies: 1
No top replies

 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Wed 3 Apr, 2013 09:22 am
You're making an assumption about derivation which is not warranted. Ingrate, meaning someone who is not thankful, derives directly from a Latin word, through French. Ingratiate derives, through Italian, from an entirely different Latin word. The in- prefix can have two different meanings, one meaning "not," the other meaning from, or upon, or out of. Words such as inherent or inhabit are formed using the second sense of in-. But that doesn't apply here because these two words derive from different words in Latin, which, although the Latin words have their roots in the same word, had different meanings before they entered English.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

deal - Question by WBYeats
Let pupils abandon spelling rules, says academic - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Please, I need help. - Question by imsak
Is this sentence grammatically correct? - Question by Sydney-Strock
"come from" - Question by mcook
concentrated - Question by WBYeats
 
  1. Forums
  2. » usage of the "in" prefix
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.75 seconds on 05/11/2024 at 02:46:01