Humanists and digitheads: what's the difference?

Humanists and digitheads: what's the difference?
The memory of the brain is associative, that is, the record of new information does not happen at random, but above (together) the already existing data in a certain part of the brain. In the opposite case, the extraction of the required would take the same amount of time as has passed since a specific event till the present moment, reminding a replay of a tape recording.
As for the humanists the main professional activity lies in memorization of all kinds of terms: chemistry, medicine, biology and linguistics, such a process does not have an objectively accurate, but only approximate nature. Partial coincidence in one or several characteristics, even the wrong assonant names lead to memorization of something new (Fig. 506). If people are involved in technical disciplines, where a single inaccuracy can affect the result, the information is not recorded until the complete coincidence of all features (Fig. 505).

One of the important questions for psychology is not only the formation of the higher nervous activity based on unification of trashy feelings of the body into groups, which determines our consciousness, as proved by Pavlov through his experiments with the dog and a lamp, but the way it happens. After all, people are unable to unite different qualities of one and the same object at once, but only in pairs, forming priority between the characteristics.[/i] The attempt to make simple mathematical calculations with three side-by-side figures: 5+3+4=8+4=12, which leads to the operation with only two of them, is a primitive example thereof. Moreover, if the number of the summed figures was more, the most important would be the general result of previous actions forgetting everything done. Thus, digitheads and humanists differ among themselves on the way they write new information to their brain as a hierarchy of object characteristics. After all, "random association" split the data not allowing making a comparative evaluation of the importance for anything specific, while the "technical thinking" creates a distinct group (Fig. 505b, Fig.506b).

Considering the pictures of brain memory formation digitheads and humanists, being obtained by logical reasoning (Fig.505, Fig.505b and Fig.506, Fig.506b) it is possible to draw paradoxial conclusions. The aim of ones is to optimize, to turn into a global unifying formula or algorithm, while others look for increasing their knowledge about the object. Thus, in one case, the leader is the one who is able to present knowledge in brief, and in another, tries for better memorization to greater analogies, and so if possible, more colorful and detailed.
For example, although those who are able to think in long logical chains are undoubtedly more talented digitheads if compared to all others, but those who are simpler are loved and respected. Speaking about the humanists everything is exactly the opposite. Love and propensity for a human spread from less cool to more progressive (there are some adjustments to the height of intelligence, because a very simple digithead can have higher education, while the most fit for work can be only an ordinary performer).
For example, if some, due to the impossibility of one-time unification, like to studying one and the same thing while playing, others look for more and more gadgets to this: a racing car with opening doors or more new dresses for a doll.

Conclusions. Deduction and empiricism, introvert and extrovert, digitheads or humanists, "a perfect man" and the same woman, but for psychologists this should look like dominance of logic or memory of each other and relevant abilities after a specific choice: more retentive than others or able to think in longer logical chains! This is not the fact of differences between people that should determine the science, but the universal cause. I do not say goodbye, because by visualization of schemes it is possible to work wonders, to introduce many new laws: to present bluff and mistakes in their graphical form, to justify delirium or even madness...

Before turning to the study of intellectual deterioration of "Indigo", it is necessary to explain the reasons for gradual increase of memory of the digitheads who are in advanced if compared to others, as well as the logic of thinking of more capable humanists when compared to others (Fig.507). If everything is clear with complex exact sciences: the longer is the chain of logic and the more complex is the object under study, the more simultaneous data should be kept in mind; why should a chemist or a biologist with a doctor start thinking, comparing and drawing conclusions? By increasing the memory capacity, there appear numerous analogies, similar to each other, resulting in the digithead’s need to unify the data under a single term, the algorithm.
For example, modern chemical production has synthesized more than a few million substances, which are annually added with several hundred thousand of new ones. Although it is almost impossible to understand the properties or to remember the characteristics of a particular mixture, but thanks to the basis, any expert can describe some features and derivatives.