13
   

North Korea Pledges Nuclear Assault on USA

 
 
BillRM
 
  0  
Reply Fri 8 Mar, 2013 08:42 am
@RABEL222,
Quote:
Let us wait untill they can reach Oklahoma and than nuke them.


So you wish to kills millions of people now in a country that at least at a moment is no direct threat to us of any kind and is unlikely to be for many years into the future?

To say nothing of what a real nuclear power would do if we start firing atom weapons at a country on their border.
RABEL222
 
  1  
Reply Fri 8 Mar, 2013 11:12 am
@BillRM,
Just waiting untill the Koreans do something worthwhile.
0 Replies
 
Advocate
 
  0  
Reply Fri 8 Mar, 2013 01:41 pm
@ehBeth,
ehBeth wrote:

gungasnake wrote:
Must have something to do with the US being incapacitated by the weakest/worst president in its national history...


so how do you explain similar threats over the past mmmmmmmmm 10/20/30/40 years? Americans always have weak presidents?

that does seem to be what you've suggested


You mean you would prefer Reagan, who was senile the entire time he was in office. Or would you prefer GWB, who never made a good decision in his life, who lied us into a horrible war, who let 9/11 happen despite getting explicit warnings, etc.?
roger
 
  1  
Reply Fri 8 Mar, 2013 01:44 pm
@Advocate,
And Obama is doing what, in the face of this explicit warning?
Advocate
 
  1  
Reply Fri 8 Mar, 2013 01:46 pm
We should be very concerned. Even if their rockets don't have sufficient range to hit us, there are many ways they could sneak a nuke into the USA.

We need to have Clinton's advice. While giving nothing to NK, he convinced them to padlock their nukes. Then, unfortunately, GWB came into office making gratuitous threats against NK, which quickly broke the locks.
roger
 
  1  
Reply Fri 8 Mar, 2013 01:57 pm
@Advocate,
Fortunately, we do have a president who is good at being very concerned.

There were no such clear warnings when Bush was president.

Clinton made all sorts of concessions, and the didn't padlock anything.

BillRM
 
  1  
Reply Fri 8 Mar, 2013 03:39 pm
@roger,
Quote:
And Obama is doing what, in the face of this explicit warning?


Other when keeping the ongoing economic pressures and going ahead with the yearly South Korea and US military exercises and so on what the hell do you wish us to do?

Come on tell us in details what you wish the US to do over a nuclear threat that is meaningless as far as their abilities to carry them out.
0 Replies
 
H2O MAN
 
  -1  
Reply Fri 8 Mar, 2013 04:16 pm
@roger,
roger wrote:

Fortunately, we do have a president who is good at being very concerned.



Very concerned... what president do you speak of?
0 Replies
 
H2O MAN
 
  -1  
Reply Fri 8 Mar, 2013 04:39 pm
WHO NEEDS NUKES? according to everything said by our president, his minions and their press the ultimate killing machine is described as an AR-15 with a high capacity bullet clip thingy. What's his name in NK knows that every able bodied American owns at least one of these baby killers and much more.

I don't fear NK Nukes.

Rodman's new best friend realizes that he lacks the firepower needed to lay waste the entire country, and last I checked, the US has the firepower to completely engulf a large portion of his country in a flash. He may be many things, but let's all hope he is not stupid. I don't think he's stupid.

The shear size of the US both in land mass and a heavily armed population (thank God) makes the country better able and equipped to survive/prevent much of what our enemies would like to do if they could put their boots on our ground.

Why does Obama want to reduce our firepower?
He wants to disarm the population and greatly reduce our total NUKE count.

What is it that Obama is so very concerned about?
roger
 
  1  
Reply Fri 8 Mar, 2013 05:12 pm
@H2O MAN,
Do keep in mind that concern does not equate to doing anything.
H2O MAN
 
  0  
Reply Fri 8 Mar, 2013 06:13 pm
@roger,
roger wrote:

Do keep in mind that concern does not equate to doing anything.

Understood, but understand that he doing something.
Obama is moving forward with his American disarmament program
roger
 
  1  
Reply Fri 8 Mar, 2013 08:24 pm
@H2O MAN,
Point taken.
0 Replies
 
BillRM
 
  1  
Reply Sat 9 Mar, 2013 06:01 am
@H2O MAN,
Quote:
Understood, but understand that he doing something.
Obama is moving forward with his American disarmament program


This nonsense is being posted when we still spend more on our military then the rest of the world does in total!!!!!!!!!!!!
H2O MAN
 
  0  
Reply Sat 9 Mar, 2013 06:24 am
@BillRM,
It's not nonsense Billyboy !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
BillRM
 
  1  
Reply Sat 9 Mar, 2013 06:44 am
@H2O MAN,
Quote:
It's not nonsense Billyboy !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


It nonsense on it face considering we are still spending more on our military then the rest of the whole damn world.
H2O MAN
 
  0  
Reply Sat 9 Mar, 2013 07:30 am
@BillRM,


So what!

For the most part, the US military is the worlds 1st responders and that doesn't come cheap.
Maybe the rest of the damn world should kick in their fair share to cover some of the expense.
BillRM
 
  0  
Reply Sat 9 Mar, 2013 08:00 am
@H2O MAN,
Quote:
For the most part, the US military is the worlds 1st responders and that doesn't come cheap.
Maybe the rest of the damn world should kick in their fair share to cover some of the expense.


Sorry to claims we are disarming when we are still spending more then the rest of the world all together on our military is beyond silly!!!!!!!!!!!!
H2O MAN
 
  -1  
Reply Sat 9 Mar, 2013 08:09 am
@BillRM,


What's beyond silly is that Obama is moving forward with plans to cut
our military and disarm the American population. That's insanity!!!!!
BillRM
 
  0  
Reply Sat 9 Mar, 2013 09:11 am
@H2O MAN,
Quote:
What's beyond silly is that Obama is moving forward with plans to cut
our military and disarm the American population. That's insanity!!!!!


Both of the above claims is so overblown that they border on the ridiculous.
BillRM
 
  0  
Reply Sat 9 Mar, 2013 09:13 am
@H2O MAN,
By the way H2O if your was president would you jump to using military forces of any kind against North Korea now?
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
GAFFNEY: Whose side is Obama on? - Discussion by gungasnake
 
Copyright © 2021 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 09/28/2021 at 05:33:15