2
   

The CBS 60 Minutes Richard Clarke Interview

 
 
Tarantulas
 
  1  
Reply Fri 2 Apr, 2004 11:59 am
Corn and Bergen respond to Mylroie's article with articles of their own. Big deal. That makes it "she said, he said" this time.
0 Replies
 
kickycan
 
  1  
Reply Fri 2 Apr, 2004 12:05 pm
You're right, Tarantulas. But let's face it, "he said, she said" is pretty much all we ever get with the media. One totally biased jackass spins his story, then some other totally biased jackass refutes it and spins it again. The truth is nowhere to be found.
0 Replies
 
Tarantulas
 
  1  
Reply Fri 2 Apr, 2004 12:08 pm
Actually this is more like "dueling blogs" than any kind of hard news story.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Fri 2 Apr, 2004 12:21 pm
Well, no it's not.

Mylroie is a professor and an adjunct fellow with the AEI.

Richard Clarke is a civil servant who was employed by three Republcan presidents and one Democrat president whose familiarity with the subject has perhaps one or two peers in the world.
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Fri 2 Apr, 2004 12:25 pm
I was listening to Karen Hughes on NPR this AM and she was basically calling Clarke a liar, or at least an extreme exagerrator over his claim about Bush needling him to blame Iraq. It was interesting.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Fri 2 Apr, 2004 12:36 pm
Richard Clarke now on airamerica
0 Replies
 
suzy
 
  1  
Reply Fri 2 Apr, 2004 02:12 pm
I would pretty much expect that of Hughes.
I thought Clinton and Gore already testified?
In private.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Fri 2 Apr, 2004 02:13 pm
Quote:
I would pretty much expect that of Hughes.

ah...yes.
0 Replies
 
sumac
 
  1  
Reply Fri 2 Apr, 2004 05:14 pm
But they are to testify again - or at least that is my understanding. I'm not surprised that they pulled Karen Hughes back into the frey. She is very good and knowledgeable, and hey, she should be called to testify too.
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Fri 2 Apr, 2004 05:24 pm
and she has a new book out
0 Replies
 
sumac
 
  1  
Reply Fri 2 Apr, 2004 05:29 pm
Yeah, I know. I bet the WH told her not to promote it at this moment in time. Unless, of course, it is very flattering of Bush, which it would be.
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Fri 2 Apr, 2004 05:30 pm
she was on The Daily Show promoting the book
0 Replies
 
Brand X
 
  1  
Reply Fri 2 Apr, 2004 05:33 pm
What did she say about it, dys?
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Fri 2 Apr, 2004 06:09 pm
Hughes is incensed at the timing of her book and declared it an appalling act of profiteering, that she was cashing with a book that exploited her insider information.
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Fri 2 Apr, 2004 06:12 pm
she said she had no insider information and the she was 10 minutes from normal.
0 Replies
 
sumac
 
  1  
Reply Fri 2 Apr, 2004 09:24 pm
10 minutes from normal, dys?
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Fri 2 Apr, 2004 09:34 pm
thats the title (I think) of her new book
0 Replies
 
Brand X
 
  1  
Reply Fri 2 Apr, 2004 09:35 pm
yup
0 Replies
 
sumac
 
  1  
Reply Fri 2 Apr, 2004 09:44 pm
Well, something like that.
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Fri 2 Apr, 2004 09:46 pm
personally I have no more confidence in Clarke than I do in Bush or Rich, believing all have an agenda discordant with credibility, Nixon lied on an equilivent with Johnson.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 03/10/2025 at 02:51:07