0
   

F-35 Fighter Jet Exempted From The "Sequester"

 
 
oralloy
 
Reply Sat 2 Mar, 2013 04:00 pm
Quote:
Lockheed Martin Corp., a major U.S weapons contractor, was awarded a $333.7 million contract just moments before the sequester was set to take effect.

According to Bloomberg, “Yesterday’s action exempts the funds from the across-the-board spending reductions known as sequestration that take effect today because Pentagon officials have said contracts with obligated dollars won’t be cut or terminated.”

The money is a down payment so that Lockheed can continue to build F-35 Jets, “the Pentagon’s most expensive program,” according to the New York Times.This represents the 8th contract for F-35’s.


http://www.theepochtimes.com/n2/united-states/lockheed-martin-gets-contract-just-before-sequester-355245.html



Outstanding! Very Happy
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 918 • Replies: 1
No top replies

 
Foofie
 
  1  
Reply Sun 3 Mar, 2013 07:25 am
@oralloy,
oralloy wrote:

Quote:
Lockheed Martin Corp., a major U.S weapons contractor, was awarded a $333.7 million contract just moments before the sequester was set to take effect.

According to Bloomberg, “Yesterday’s action exempts the funds from the across-the-board spending reductions known as sequestration that take effect today because Pentagon officials have said contracts with obligated dollars won’t be cut or terminated.”

The money is a down payment so that Lockheed can continue to build F-35 Jets, “the Pentagon’s most expensive program,” according to the New York Times.This represents the 8th contract for F-35’s.


http://www.theepochtimes.com/n2/united-states/lockheed-martin-gets-contract-just-before-sequester-355245.html



Outstanding! Very Happy


And, may the U.S. have a wide choice of bases for them to be stationed.

I tend to believe that most of the enemies of the U.S. really only understand advanced weapons systems as a reason to not be belligerent. However, there's a co-factor, I believe, of the need for a political climate that allows them to be optimized (aka, have the willingness to use them). Sort of like what's the good of being tall, dark and handsome, if one is also impotent.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
GAFFNEY: Whose side is Obama on? - Discussion by gungasnake
 
  1. Forums
  2. » F-35 Fighter Jet Exempted From The "Sequester"
Copyright © 2021 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 03/08/2021 at 08:41:38