WHINES AND THE WHINING WHINERS WHO WHINE THEM

It's interesting to see who is doing the whining here...

hobitbob wrote:

Conservative logic:
Sex bad, killing wonderful!

Conservative logic:
Illegal drugs unacceptable, prescription pain killers taken en masse by Rushbo acceptable.

Conservative logic:
Capitol punishment right, abortion wrong.

Conservative logic:
blowjobs by a president immoral, illegal invasion of another country moral.

LOL perhaps I'm too new to know the real score, but an example is McGentrix. Who responded to the statements, not the poster. On SS, you may have one poster respond to the statements, while everyone else piles on and vilifies [doglover] with you're stupid, you're evil, you're a freako commie liberal, you're a blah blah blah..

Are you keeping track of the fact that even the ACLU is trying hard to keep Rush's medical records private as the government tries to build a case against him?

Hey, I can't expect the ACLU to be right all the time, now can I. :wink:


Someone proven to be guilty of a crime versus a baby who hasn't had the chance to live, much less commit a crime against a fellow human. Are you really making this comparison?

All too often in this country, innocent men and women have been found guilty and sentenced to death. Thanks to DNA testing, many of those falsely imprisoned have been released before it was too late. IMHO, the wrongful killing of even one innocent person by the state is one too many. When the state takes a mans life he cannot give it back to him. I don't consider a fetus a baby in the first trimester of pregnancy, therefore, I have no problem with termination. God induced miscarriages happen quite often in the first trimester.

Getting caught in a public lie about getting a BJ vs. a legal invasion that will better millions of lives...yeah. I think the moaral is about right there.

You meant to say an invasion predicated on lies that resulted in the deaths of thousands of innocent men women and children didn't you McG? How about the surviving family members of those who were killed. Do you think they're better off? How about the orphans that were created because of this so called 'war on terrorism'? Are they better off? I think your morals are screwed up McG.

No, I meant to say that it was a legal invasion that has bettered the lives of millions of Iraqi's. It was an invasion based on 12 years of dodging UN resolutions, 12 years of killing millions of Iraqi's, 12 years of avoiding weapons inspectors, and 12 years of supporting various terrorist organizations. As sad as it is, yes, the orphans will have a better life and future now. They will have thr opportunity to live in a free country where they can express their own ideas, religion, and belief. They are even free to protest the American presence in Iraq.

No, I meant to say that it was a legal invasion that has bettered the lives of millions of Iraqi's. It was an invasion based on 12 years of dodging UN resolutions, 12 years of killing millions of Iraqi's, 12 years of avoiding weapons inspectors, and 12 years of supporting various terrorist organizations. As sad as it is, yes, the orphans will have a better life and future now. They will have thr opportunity to live in a free country where they can express their own ideas, religion, and belief. They are even free to protest the American presence in Iraq.

No, I meant to say that it was a legal invasion that has bettered the lives of millions of Iraqi's. It was an invasion based on 12 years of dodging UN resolutions, 12 years of killing millions of Iraqi's, 12 years of avoiding weapons inspectors, and 12 years of supporting various terrorist organizations. As sad as it is, yes, the orphans will have a better life and future now. They will have thr opportunity to live in a free country where they can express their own ideas, religion, and belief. They are even free to protest the American presence in Iraq.
Saddam did let the weapons inspectors do their thing and he told them time and time again that he had no WMD. As for Saddam supporting various terrorists organizations, I don't think so. Saddam used his money to build lavish palaces and provide lavish lifestyles for himself and his two sons. Oh, and BTW ~ wasn't Rumsfeld giving Saddam arms back in 1982 when he was our buddy?
If you want to only look at the negatives of everything that Bush does or has done, feel free. It's a blindness the left is used to.
McG believe me when I say it is with regret that I have to point out the negatives of the Bush presidency. I voted for him in 2000 and supported him when he began the true war against terrorism in Afhganastan. I supported Bush until he lost sight of what the war on terrorism was all about.
If you can't tell the difference between capitol punishment and abortion, well, nothing I say will be able to help you.

Mass graves in Iraq that have been found so far have uncovered 500-600 thousand bodies, but estimates are well over a million have been slaughtered by Saddam.


I am disappointed by the lack of vision being demonstrated here...

Are you suggesting that our foriegn policy should be the same for each and every country?

Mass graves in Iraq that have been found so far have uncovered 500-600 thousand bodies, but estimates are well over a million have been slaughtered by Saddam. I am disappointed by the lack of vision being demonstrated here...