Reply Fri 15 Feb, 2013 11:40 pm
Hi English Teachers,
Do the below two sentences have the same meaning? Thanks a lot in advance.
That is not to say that the men are not handsome.
That is to say that the men are handsome.

  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Question • Score: 2 • Views: 1,138 • Replies: 8
No top replies

 
Lustig Andrei
 
  1  
Reply Sat 16 Feb, 2013 02:36 pm
@Loh Jane,
Yes, the meaning of both sentences is the same. The first example is what is sometimes called a litotes, that is a sentence construction where a thought is expressed through negatives, the denial of an opposite possibility.

In common usage, however, the sentences have a subtly different connotation. To use the first example, it implies a previous statement which could be misinterpreted as having implied that the "men are not handsome." The sentence would then be intended to clarify this and emphasize that this is not what was meant by the previous statement. The second example is simply a straightforward affirmation of the handsomeness of the men in question (although this, too, implies a previous sentence because "that is to say" seems to refer to such a previous statement.)
dalehileman
 
  1  
Reply Sat 16 Feb, 2013 03:20 pm
@Loh Jane,
Quote:
Do the below two sentences have the same meaning?
My immediate reaction is "no"; though I'm sure Andy's analysis is on the ball. Probably I'm replicating to some extent, but


Quote:
That is not to say that the men are not handsome.
Implication: Still they might all be ugly; or we can't judge because their heads are all turned away

0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Sat 16 Feb, 2013 08:16 pm
@Lustig Andrei,
Quote:
Yes, the meaning of both sentences is the same.


Quote:
In common usage, however, the sentences have a subtly different connotation.


?????????
Lustig Andrei
 
  1  
Reply Sat 16 Feb, 2013 08:18 pm
@JTT,
JTT wrote:

Quote:
Yes, the meaning of both sentences is the same.


Quote:
In common usage, however, the sentences have a subtly different connotation.


?????????


I do hope you read the entire response, JTT. The next few sentences explain what I mean by 'subtly different connotation.' Why the ????????
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Sat 16 Feb, 2013 08:35 pm
@Loh Jane,
Quote:
Do the below two sentences have the same meaning?


This positioning of 'below' has always sounded strange to me.

Do the two sentences below have the same meaning?

It doesn't sound at all strange with its opposite.

Do the above two sentences have the same meaning?

I wonder what other native speakers think.
Lustig Andrei
 
  1  
Reply Sat 16 Feb, 2013 08:39 pm
@JTT,
For just this once, I agree with you. (Although, technically, I'm not a 'native speaker' of English. Smile)
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Sun 17 Feb, 2013 06:16 am
@Loh Jane,
Basically it's all down to context, 'That is to say that the men are handsome,' could stand on its own. It merely states that the men are handsome, but, if it's on its own it would sound better with a few less words, 'The men are handsome.'

Having said that both sentences really depend on those that precede them. 'That is to say that the men are handsome,' suggests something positive has been said about the men, and the sentence reinforces that positive statement. As in the example below.

The men are lean, suntanned and muscular. That is to say that the men are handsome.

However, with the sentence, 'That is not to say that the men are not handsome,' the implication is that something negative has been said about the men, but regardless of this they're still good looking. As in the example below.

The men are rude, loud and obnoxious. That is not to say that the men are not handsome.
0 Replies
 
dalehileman
 
  1  
Reply Sun 17 Feb, 2013 01:32 pm
@JTT,
Quote:
Do the below two sentences have the same meaning?

Quote:
This positioning of 'below' has always sounded strange to me.
Me too, sounds overbelown

(Forgive)

Quote:
Do the two sentences below have the same meaning?
Yes definitely preferred colloquial

Quote:
It doesn't sound at all strange with its opposite.

[That is,]
Quote:
Do the above two sentences have the same meaning?
Yea my reaction also, isn't it strange

Quote:
I wonder what other native speakers think.
I'm one (though my input doesn't have much weight hereabout)
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

deal - Question by WBYeats
Let pupils abandon spelling rules, says academic - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Please, I need help. - Question by imsak
Is this sentence grammatically correct? - Question by Sydney-Strock
"come from" - Question by mcook
concentrated - Question by WBYeats
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Grammar
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.06 seconds on 12/11/2024 at 01:12:49