@Lola,
Quote:boring Records Building
Records are very interesting to some people. Sociologists pore over them whilst sub-consciously drinking their coffee. Thousands, maybe hundreds of thousands, of decicated scientists have invented themselves a "nice little earner" studying records and deriving from them real scientific evidence of certain interesting aspects of human behaviour.
A new study in this line of work has shown that there is a correlation between diabetes and the quantity of sugar in circulation within a population. All other issues being set aside. The greater the amount of sugar in circulation the higher the incidence of diabetes. Tons/Cases.
I suppose the effect might be due to our bodies not having evolved to deal with sugar considering how long we have been evolving and how little sugar was available during so much of that time that the period sugar has been available is but the last tick of the second-finger to midnight in comparison.
It should provide the tobacco banners something new to get their teeth into now that the Constitution is a barrier to their further progress. The beady-eyed bossy boots will be getting their bottle-bottomed glasses misted up.
Was it Rojack in An American Dream who spooned sugar into his mouth out of the bowl? David Lynch consumed a large cake made of icing sugar before directing a scene. Sugar is a very big deal.
Perhaps sugar should carry a health warning. SUGAR CAN KILL say. Over a Grim Reaper logo.
And that arising out of a study in medical records. The records of births, marriages and deaths present as juicy a carcass as ever Casonova set his blimpers on.
But that is not all. The presence of these records, which are expanding as fast as the universe is supposed to be doing, has wannabee scientific celebrities, and already landed scientific celebrities, lying awake at night pondering how they might connect up two manifestions of human activity which had not previously been thought to be related, get the funding lined up and proceed to save all our lives.
Supposing, for example, and I know it's a trifle fanciful, that a researcher compared the prognosis for sheep farmers with that of assistant costume quick-change assistants in places of entertainment where gyrating Jezebels strut their stuff, and discovered that, with all other things being equal, the latter were at a significant advantage.
No more lamb chops. Which are very fatty. As are legs of lamb. All we would have to do is have more places of entertainment where gyrating Jezebels go forth (fourth--geddit? Sheesh!!) and we could all see a few more Superbowls than we might otherwise do. Doubleplusgood.
Aldous Huxley hinted at suchlike but his basic Christian decency stayed his hand in the manner Bernie once claimed to have constrained himself to do on my behalf. Although I'll admit that Mr Huxley couldn't be expected to visualise internet dogging where even ladies who can't dance can perform.
The thing is that if all the ladies worked in places of entertainment of the type under consideration then men's wages would be twice as high. At least. And thus men would have more banknotes to throw on the stages.
Records are definitely not boring Lola. Burroughs has a piece about the national records office complex in Naked Lunch.