Foxfyre wrote:Quote:Very well. Religious people may reproduce at will. Although, I plan on sneaking up on their children and grandchildren and teaching them science.
I teach an adult class on "The Development of Christian Thought" designed and targeted at Christians. Would you believe that in my class are a PhD geologist, an anthropologist, a biologist, three or four engineers, a sociologist, and a highschool general science teacher? These people seem to have no difficulty accepting religious belief within the framework of science or vice versa because they are open to other possibilities and not one believes we already have all the science we will ever have. I think that's pretty darn intelligent.
Note that educated people all over the world choose to believe in the religious fantasy that is prevalent in their society - Hindu's, Muslims, Christians, Scientologits, etc. So, your chosen delusion is not the exclusive province of educated religious people. It doesn't validate Christianity any more than it does any other religious belief throughout the ages.
Also, the vast majority of scientists are non-believers. Going beyond the fact that science has proven to be a better descriptor of the universe than any other institution, the entire history of science is a story of the steady demolition of the pillars of faith. Let me know when this trend reverses.
I'll reference terracentrism, the age of the Earth, etc, etc, etc.
Religious nutbars variously respond to scientific advances by a) fundamentally altering thier beliefs to intrepret the Bible in a way that jives with new info (See: old earthers vs new earthers), b) claiming the scripture was meant to be taken metaphorically not literally (see: Noah's fairy tale), d) denying the new scientific discovery untill long after it has been proven (see: Galileo.)
The fact that some very intelligent people believe in god does not make the delusion charge any less valid. Human beings, regardless of intelligence, constantly distort their memories and remembrances for psychological reasons. How much more powerful then is the capacity to develop a belief where there is no contradictory sensory input, if that belief is psychologically useful. And it is.