Pravda: Ameericans, Keep Your Guns

Reply Mon 31 Dec, 2012 11:06 pm


Americans never give up your guns

By Stanislav Mishin

These days, there are few few things to admire about the socialist, bankrupt and culturally degenerating USA, but at least so far, one thing remains: the right to bare arms and use deadly force to defend one's self and possessions.

This will probably come as a total shock to most of my Western readers, but at one point, Russia was one of the most heavily armed societies on earth. This was, of course, when we were free under the Tsar. Weapons, from swords and spears to pistols, rifles and shotguns were everywhere, common items. People carried them concealed, they carried them holstered. Fighting knives were a prominent part of many traditional attires and those little tubes criss crossing on the costumes of Cossacks and various Caucasian peoples? Well those are bullet holders for rifles.

Various armies, such as the Poles, during the Смута (Times of Troubles), or Napoleon, or the Germans even as the Tsarist state collapsed under the weight of WW1 and Wall Street monies, found that holding Russian lands was much much harder than taking them and taking was no easy walk in the park but a blood bath all its own. In holding, one faced an extremely well armed and aggressive population Hell bent on exterminating or driving out the aggressor.

Print version
Font Size
Send to friend
This well armed population was what allowed the various White factions to rise up, no matter how disorganized politically and militarily they were in 1918 and wage a savage civil war against the Reds. It should be noted that many of these armies were armed peasants, villagers, farmers and merchants, protecting their own. If it had not been for Washington's clandestine support of and for the Reds, history would have gone quite differently.

Moscow fell, for example, not from a lack of weapons to defend it, but from the lieing guile of the Reds. Ten thousand Reds took Moscow and were opposed only by some few hundreds of officer cadets and their instructors. Even then the battle was fierce and losses high. However, in the city alone, at that time, lived over 30,000 military officers (both active and retired), all with their own issued weapons and ammunition, plus tens of thousands of other citizens who were armed. The Soviets promised to leave them all alone if they did not intervene. They did not and for that were asked afterwards to come register themselves and their weapons: where they were promptly shot.

Of course being savages, murderers and liars does not mean being stupid and the Reds learned from their Civil War experience. One of the first things they did was to disarm the population. From that point, mass repression, mass arrests, mass deportations, mass murder, mass starvation were all a safe game for the powers that were. The worst they had to fear was a pitchfork in the guts or a knife in the back or the occasional hunting rifle. Not much for soldiers.

To this day, with the Soviet Union now dead 21 years, with a whole generation born and raised to adulthood without the SU, we are still denied our basic and traditional rights to self defense. Why? We are told that everyone would just start shooting each other and crime would be everywhere....but criminals are still armed and still murdering and to often, especially in the far regions, those criminals wear the uniforms of the police. The fact that everyone would start shooting is also laughable when statistics are examined.

While President Putin pushes through reforms, the local authorities, especially in our vast hinterland, do not feel they need to act like they work for the people. They do as they please, a tyrannical class who knows they have absolutely nothing to fear from a relatively unarmed population. This in turn breeds not respect but absolute contempt and often enough, criminal abuse.

For those of us fighting for our traditional rights, the US 2nd Amendment is a rare light in an ever darkening room. Governments will use the excuse of trying to protect the people from maniacs and crime, but are in reality, it is the bureaucrats protecting their power and position. In all cases where guns are banned, gun crime continues and often increases. As for maniacs, be it nuts with cars (NYC, Chapel Hill NC), swords (Japan), knives (China) or home made bombs (everywhere), insane people strike. They throw acid (Pakistan, UK), they throw fire bombs (France), they attack. What is worse, is, that the best way to stop a maniac is not psychology or jail or "talking to them", it is a bullet in the head, that is why they are a maniac, because they are incapable of living in reality or stopping themselves.

The excuse that people will start shooting each other is also plain and silly. So it is our politicians saying that our society is full of incapable adolescents who can never be trusted? Then, please explain how we can trust them or the police, who themselves grew up and came from the same culture?

No it is about power and a total power over the people. There is a lot of desire to bad mouth the Tsar, particularly by the Communists, who claim he was a tyrant, and yet under him we were armed and under the progressives disarmed. Do not be fooled by a belief that progressives, leftists hate guns. Oh, no, they do not. What they hate is guns in the hands of those who are not marching in lock step of their ideology. They hate guns in the hands of those who think for themselves and do not obey without question. They hate guns in those whom they have slated for a barrel to the back of the ear.

So, do not fall for the false promises and do not extinguish the light that is left to allow humanity a measure of self respect.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 3,001 • Replies: 9
No top replies

Reply Mon 31 Dec, 2012 11:19 pm
It is higher strengths failure, that includes the escalation of power against the people.

The lack of weaponry is a facade at best in any event.

To raise powerful ideals in those who are to protect and encourage the people of their beloved motherland, ideals which fall upon the people in atrocious ways, is the way of histories failure.

When will the world see that the world SEES?.

Protecting the motherland requires removing the lifeblood which is fuel at this time, to prevent the burning out of ones most lusting enemy upon the people. Power is protection, Russia stands with pride in a new dawn of collective striving with the world towards a space they held their heads high to view, from Babushkas warning to the revelation of supreme unity in space endeavors.

Do not strive to fell the hopes of those wisest people who fall at the barrel of the crudest design by man!.
0 Replies
Reply Tue 1 Jan, 2013 12:29 am
This is advice from a land which has already been down the road which Obunga, Soros, Feinstein et. al. want to take the United States down...
Reply Tue 1 Jan, 2013 12:34 am
0 Replies
Reply Tue 1 Jan, 2013 01:04 pm
The same Pravda also has this article:
Young Cannibal Kills and Eats Eleven To Impress Girl Friend
Walter Hinteler
Reply Tue 1 Jan, 2013 02:02 pm
The Pravda is since 1999 a tabloid, with three print editions per week.

The quoted article was neither written by Pravda staff nor for this paper: it's copied from a blog (Mat Rodina; Owner: Stanislav Mishin http://mat-rodina.blogspot.de/)
Reply Tue 1 Jan, 2013 02:05 pm
@Walter Hinteler,
Pravda is free to find good material to publish where it will and on a scale of one to ten for brains, Stanislav Mishin appears to be a nine or a ten and you're vanishingly close to a zero.
0 Replies
Reply Wed 2 Jan, 2013 01:29 am
Did it function?. That or the real case?.

Some rather telling conclusions to be drawn about sexual solidity in that situation... The lengths people go to for belief, if that belief is apparently the nature of life.

Oh, blame, the saviour and the curse of those who see no alternative.
Did you know a lab with £40,000 funding can create a child with any belief known or unknown?.. Then copies of that for next to nothing?.
Blank slates are the guilty.. Teach what is right, or blame what is wrong?.

0 Replies
Reply Wed 2 Jan, 2013 01:01 pm

The purpose of the Second Amendment is to secure our ability to oppose enemies foreign
and domestic, a guarantee against disorder and tyranny. There is no legitimate exception
to the Second Amendment for military-style weapons, because military-style weapons are
precisely what the Second Amendment guarantees our right to keep and bear.
Reply Wed 2 Jan, 2013 01:23 pm
It might be one thing if the cops and military, gang-bangers, and all foreign millitary organizations were to switch to all muzzle-loaders, but I don't see that happening, and until that DOES happen, we need to be able to own modern firearms.
0 Replies

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
  1. Forums
  2. » Pravda: Ameericans, Keep Your Guns
Copyright © 2023 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.14 seconds on 10/04/2023 at 11:31:20