Banning Guns: What Difference Would It Make?

Foofie wrote:

In my opinion, you protesteth too much. The winds of change are blowing, with increased velocity, I believe. Probably because what trumps everything is that people that will be raising children need to feel their children are safe at school, or movies, etc.; since otherwise, the U.S. might wind up with no next generation to the degree we have had historically. In my opinion, the joys/need of target shooting, hunting, home protection, etc., are trumped by society's need to reproduce itself each generation with parents willing to expend a few decades of dedicated effort, without the fear of mass shootings of their children.

No, our Second Amendment rights stand undefeated and undefeatable.

Foofie wrote:

In my opinion, you protesteth too much.

The winds of change may just blow up your skirt and show the world what you are hiding.

Again, Parasite and his/her liberal democrats ilk hate individualism, they like their humans divided into groups.

The one group liberal democrats hate and fear the most is the black American individual that legally possesses firearms.

oralloy wrote:

Foofie wrote:

In my opinion, you protesteth too much. The winds of change are blowing, with increased velocity, I believe. Probably because what trumps everything is that people that will be raising children need to feel their children are safe at school, or movies, etc.; since otherwise, the U.S. might wind up with no next generation to the degree we have had historically. In my opinion, the joys/need of target shooting, hunting, home protection, etc., are trumped by society's need to reproduce itself each generation with parents willing to expend a few decades of dedicated effort, without the fear of mass shootings of their children.

No, our Second Amendment rights stand undefeated and undefeatable.

Are you sure the definition of "arms" (as stated in the right to bear arms) will always include assault rifles?

Considering the military has weapons aside from assault rifles, can people claim they have the right to bear tanks, drones, etc.?

When the Second Amendment was written, arms was a pretty narrow definition;

was it meant to expand to assault rifles, and who know what?

... The fact that an assault weapon is just a gun with harmless cosmetic features like a pistol grip means there is no legitimate reason to ban them, and that means any such ban will violate Rational Basis Review...

the number of bullets that can be put into each clip.

oralloy wrote:

... The fact that an assault weapon is just a gun with harmless cosmetic features like a pistol grip means there is no legitimate reason to ban them, and that means any such ban will violate Rational Basis Review...

The HARMFUL features are reflected in the speed that bullets can be fired,

and the number of bullets that can be put into each clip.

Since, in my opinion, I consider your comment above an incorrect assessment, please refrain from commenting on my posts.

You have your opinion, and I have mine. These opinions are based on our respective sets of experience, meaning we have very little in common.

Please do not respond to my posts.

The HARMFUL features are reflected in the speed that bullets can be fired, and the number of bullets that can be put into each clip....

Oregon sheriff tells Biden he won't enforce new gun regulations