3
   

Robert Bork, Former Supreme Court Nominee Dead at 85

 
 
Sturgis
 
Reply Wed 19 Dec, 2012 12:03 pm
Pittsburgh native Robert Heron Bork has died.


http://www.post-gazette.com/stories/local/region/robert-bork-supreme-court-nominee-pittsburgh-native-dies-666975/

Quote:
Robert H. Bork, 85, whose last name became a verb during his controversial, failed attempt to be confirmed for a seat on the U.S. Supreme Court, died today at a hospital in Virginia.

Mr. Bork's passing was confirmed by his son Robert Jr., according to the Associated Press. The cause of death was complications stemming from heart ailments.


http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/20/us/robert-h-bork-conservative-jurist-dies-at-85.html?_r=0

Quote:
Robert H. Bork, Conservative Jurist, Dies at 85
Robert H. Bork, a former solicitor general, federal judge and conservative legal theorist whose 1987 nomination to the United States Supreme Court was rejected by the Senate in a historic political battle whose impact is still being felt, died on Wednesday in Arlington, Va. He was 85.

Judge Bork’s death, of complications of heart disease, was confirmed by his son Robert H. Bork Jr.

Judge Bork, who was senior judicial adviser this year to the presidential campaign of Gov. Mitt Romney, played a small but crucial role in the Watergate crisis as the solicitor general under President Richard M. Nixon. He carried out orders to fire a special prosecutor in what became known as “the Saturday Night Massacre.” He also handed down notable decisions from the federal appeals court bench. But it was as a symbol of the nation’s culture wars that Judge Bork made his name.

It is rare for the Senate in its constitutional “advice and consent” role to turn down a president’s Supreme Court nominee, and rarer still for that rejection to be based not on qualifications but on judicial philosophy and temperament. That turned Judge Bork’s defeat into a watershed event and his name into a verb: getting “borked” is what happens to a nominee rejected for what supporters consider political motives.

The success of the anti-Bork campaign is widely seen to have shifted the tone and emphasis of Supreme Court nominations since then, giving them an often strong political cast and making it hard, many argue, for a nominee with firmly held views ever to get confirmed.

Till the end of his life, Judge Bork argued that American judges, acting to please a liberal elite, have hijacked the struggle over national values by overstepping their role, especially in many of the most important decisions on civil rights and liberties, personal autonomy and regulation of business.

He advocated a view of judging known as “strict constructionism,” or “originalism,” because it seeks to limit constitutional values to those explicitly enunciated by the Framers and to reject those that evolved in later generations. He dismissed the view that the courts had rightly come to the aid of those neglected by the majority. By contrast, he felt that majorities, through legislatures, should be empowered to make all decisions not specifically addressed in the Constitution.

He most famously took issue with the Supreme Court’s assertion in the 1960s and ’70s that the Constitution implicitly recognizes a right of privacy that bars states from outlawing abortion or the use of contraceptives by married couples.

That position along with his rejection of court-mandated help to minority groups led a coalition of liberal groups to push successfully for his Senate defeat, motivated in no small part by their sense that he cared more about abstract legal reasoning than the people affected by it. They contended that his confirmation would produce a radical shift on a closely divided Supreme Court and “turn back the clock” on civil and individual rights.

Judge Bork, who was 60 at the time, was sitting on the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, often a steppingstone to the Supreme Court, when President Ronald Reagan announced on July 1, 1987, that he was nominating him to the high court to replace Lewis Powell, a moderate justice who was retiring. Within an hour of the announcement, Senator Edward M. Kennedy, the Massachusetts Democrat, set the tone for the bruising contest to come when he said in a speech:

“Robert Bork’s America is a land in which women would be forced into back alley abortions, blacks would sit at segregated lunch counters, rogue police could break down citizens’ doors in midnight raids, school children could not be taught about evolution, writers and artists could be censored at the whim of government, and the doors of the federal courts would be shut on the fingers of millions of citizens for whom the judiciary is — and is often the only — protector of the individual rights that are the heart of our democracy.”

(article continues for a few pages more at the NYTimes link)



http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2012/12/the-sad-legacy-of-robert-bork/266456/

Quote:
The late judge didn't have a chance to move Supreme Court jurisprudence. But his failure to be confirmed had a profound and regrettable effect on how we nominate justices today.

The relentless honesty and arrogant mien of Robert Bork, who has died at 84, during his unforgettable 1987 Supreme Court nomination hearing resulted in two very important things for this nation. First, it precluded the ideologue from becoming a life-tenured justice, which has meant over the intervening 25 years many saving graces for progressives and many bitter disappointments for conservatives. Second, it changed (forever, I suspect) the way judicial confirmation hearings unfold, by encouraging earnest nominees to say to the Senate Judiciary Committee nothing at all candid, specific, or profound about their judicial philosophies or views of the law.

 
edgarblythe
 
  3  
Reply Wed 19 Dec, 2012 01:01 pm
@Sturgis,
ashes to ashes, dust to dust
0 Replies
 
H2O MAN
 
  -4  
Reply Wed 19 Dec, 2012 01:47 pm
@Sturgis,


Let's hope God brings Ted Kennedy up from hell just
long enough for Bork to kick the **** out of that fat-ass liar.
farmerman
 
  5  
Reply Wed 19 Dec, 2012 03:30 pm
@H2O MAN,
try to be at peace there spurt , its been like 30+ yesars ago since he entrapped himself into revealing his true feelings about equal rights for all.
Lustig Andrei
 
  2  
Reply Wed 19 Dec, 2012 03:50 pm
@farmerman,
Like him or hate him, he was an important force in American jurisprudence during his career.
Thomas
 
  2  
Reply Wed 19 Dec, 2012 11:42 pm
@Sturgis,
As I said in the other thread on the topic:

Personally, I have a lot of sympathy for his approach to judging. On top of this, Bork's books on public affairs exposed me forcefully and intelligently to the ideas of American conservatism, most of which I disagree with. But that's okay. I seek authors exposing views I disagree with. And among these authors, few were as much worth seeking as Robert Bork. I'll miss him.
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  2  
Reply Thu 20 Dec, 2012 05:48 am
@Lustig Andrei,
He was one of the first of thePost Watergate era conservatives who really spoke well in "code talk". I think that many talk show hosts used him for a model.
RABEL222
 
  1  
Reply Thu 20 Dec, 2012 02:43 pm
@farmerman,
Code talk?
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Thu 20 Dec, 2012 04:36 pm
@RABEL222,
his use of more PC words when he spoke of guaranteed rights of blacks and intrinsic rights of women
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
GAFFNEY: Whose side is Obama on? - Discussion by gungasnake
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Robert Bork, Former Supreme Court Nominee Dead at 85
Copyright © 2021 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 09/23/2021 at 05:41:07