So how can something come from nothing (for example the creation of the universe)?
The answer is: without-any-problems.
The whole theory of the big bang with the expanding universe that is accelerating is unjustified from the very beginning to wherever it goes. It is based on the assumption that the red shift in the light spectrum is due to Doppler effect of light.
The new theories in physics claim that the particles are increasing in mass nowadays (blue shift) and this red shift observed in the distant past of the universe is the natural standing onto that moment.
Nothing has been created by the big bang, and most probably the universe has always existed or at least so far away back in time that the information about this is irretrievably lost (or at least most of it).
The big bang apologetics does not have any reasonable explanation of the evolution of the stars and of the evolution of the species.
Let me ask you something: If I leave my laptop without OS on the grub to meet the impact of the fluctuations in the power supply of the grid, the stochastic pulses from thunderstorms induced in the net cable, the random errors on the hard disk ... what is the probability for the big bang to assemble a full-featured OS in brilliant operation standing? For that is exactly what the big bang apologetics is claiming. They put all the contraductions that they may encounter throughout the explanation of their fake theory into the definition of the terms (any of which more exotic and incomprihensible) - gravitational singularity, membrane universe, time-space continuum - as a result of which the theory becomes hunky dory (without any verification and validation tests).
So making something out of nothing is not only possible ... but it is the formula of success.