Mass Shooting At Denver Batman Movie Premiere

Invent your own bogeymen eh Krumpie?

It's a bit far-fetched. You should try to stay somewhere in the region of common sense.

What are the statistics on somebody tooling up with rocks, sticks and any and all objects that could be used as an instrument to cause bodily harm, and going into a crowded place and deploying them in such a way as to kill and injure nearly 60 Batman fans.

Invent your own bogeymen eh Krumpie?

It's a bit far-fetched. You should try to stay somewhere in the region of common sense.

What are the statistics on somebody tooling up with rocks, sticks and any and all objects that could be used as an instrument to cause bodily harm, and going into a crowded place and deploying them in such a way as to kill and injure dozens of people.

You!!--Krumpie?? --catching me off guard. That'll be the day.

Be my guest Krumpie.

Sorry but Jefferson feel that it was a blank check in the constitution and that the Federals under Hamilton was using it as such by for example claiming the power to charters banks and corporations.

A power found no where directly under the constitution.....................

"An individual has to demonstrate that he had good reason to possess a knife, for example for fishing, other sporting purposes or as part of his profession (e.g. a chef) in a public place.

Invent your own bogeymen eh Krumpie?

It's a bit far-fetched. You should try to stay somewhere in the region of common sense.

What are the statistics on somebody tooling up with rocks, sticks and any and all objects that could be used as an instrument to cause bodily harm, and going into a crowded place and deploying them in such a way as to kill and injure dozens of people.

And why bring up the Oklahoma bomber? He would have been arrested if caught with the bomb at any time before he planted it. His bomb was banned. That case could be cited by those who want to ban guns. McVeigh's bomb was him "bearing arms". To cite the case on the other side, as has been done, is idiotic.

Not idiotic at all. Bombers might be caught now and then, but many are not caught until they act.

Bringing up the issue of mad bombers is a valid way of derailing the silly claim that gun control will prevent large-scale massacres.

You could have done garden implements, pillows, knitting needles, disinfectants and pottery.

What honesty are you talking about? That sticks can be compared to assault weapons with large magazines. That's honest?? It's rubbish.

Read Homer to see a few methods of premeditated murder before firearms were invented. Or better still Edward Gibbon.

very large magazine might put a gun in a different lethality category (regardless of whether or not it was an assault weapon), but certainly no more lethal than bombs.

Quote:

very large magazine might put a gun in a different lethality category (regardless of whether or not it was an assault weapon), but certainly no more lethal than bombs.

Clips can be change/replace in a second so therefore smaller clips are unlikely to reduce the average rate of fire all that must.

The shotting at the once college who name is not coming to me at the moment the killer did his killing with a normal semi-auto handgun with normal size clips.

As it was not an assault gun it did not seems to get the news play this case is getting.

Almost all homicides are small-scale attacks that could easily be carried out with lesser weapons (or even with no weapons at all).

That is why gun availability has little impact on homicide rates.

Bringing up the issue of mad bombers is a valid way of derailing the silly claim that gun control will prevent large-scale massacres.

One wonder what Churchill would think of his countrymen of today.

An assault weapon is just a gun with certain harmless cosmetic features, so it would indeed be reasonable to compare it with a lesser weapon like a club or a stick.