@FOUND SOUL,
FOUND SOUL wrote:Seriously, that is how you read that?
Well, some people (like me) might be inclined toward
that means of
preventing the gun from being turned against the home defender (good guy),
but I had a mild suspicion that u saw it differently -- not sure.
Anyway, I thought it was kidding u a little bit,
affording u the opportunity to explicitly express yourself in explanation.
FOUND SOUL wrote:My point was... People having to take on the responsibility of protecting themselves..
The daughter phoned the police, the Father started shooting the intruder, good cop bad cop..
In your mind, he was
bad,
to shoot holes in the criminal ?
FOUND SOUL wrote:My point being, what a shame we live in that type of a world,
U know, Found Soul, that from the time of the beginning of our species,
we have lived in a predatory environment, subject to the depredations of Man and beast; just the shape of the world.
I believe that the vast majority of other forms of life (if not
ALL of them)
also live their lives in predatory environments.
FOUND SOUL wrote:you know we can't carry guns here, we have to look at other ways to protect.
I wish I coud think of some good advice for u.
Just be guided by these considerations of self defense when u vote for politicians.
FOUND SOUL wrote:And, then my concern showed that sheez,
an intruder may be used to this and can outsmart an owner and turn the gun on him,
It is the
RESPONSIBILITY of the defending gunner (homeowner) to prevent that from happening
by
disabling the violent criminal with gunfire.
Let the criminal be smart
AFTER he has been disabled by gunfire.
FOUND SOUL wrote: maybe there is a better choice of weapon than guns.
That's all.
Thank u. I remain uncertain on 1 point:
what was your reasoning as to the bow, as distinct from the gun ?
In other words, as u see it,
HOW 'd a defending homeowner
be better off if he chose one instead of the other ?
David