Criminal Invades Bathroom. Homeowner fights back.

oralloy wrote:

I'm very sorry to hear that. The lack of freedom outside the US is appalling.

******* dick. One overwhelming advantage of living outside the US is that there aren't any Oralloys.

oralloy wrote:

I'm very sorry to hear that. The lack of freedom outside the US is appalling.

******* dick. One overwhelming advantage of living outside the US is that there aren't any Oralloys.

Sure there are. There may not be any freedom outside the US, but there are plenty of people like me, with the morals to condemn you atrocity-supporting monsters, in any country.

Just an opinion you understand, but I suspect most crooks tend to be optimists. That is, they don't intentionally seek out armed opposition

Just an opinion you understand, but I suspect most crooks tend to be optimists.
That is, they don't intentionally seek out armed opposition

Understand Excepting, gun laws are "ok" over in America so wouldn't most Criminals,
'wonder' as to whether the owner had one?

IDK.. respectfully, just asking.

In your mind, he was bad,
to shoot holes in the criminal ?

U know, Found Soul, that from the time of the beginning of our species,
we have lived in a predatory environment, subject to the depredations of Man and beast; just the shape of the world.
I believe that the vast majority of other forms of life (if not ALL of them)
also live their lives in predatory environments.

i wish I coud think of some good advice for u.
Just be guided by these considerations of self defense when u vote for politicians.

It is the RESPONSIBILITY of the defending gunner (homeowner) to prevent that from happening
by disabling the violent criminal with gunfire.
Let the criminal be smart AFTER he has been disabled by gunfire.

Thank u. I remain uncertain on 1 point:
what was your reasoning as to the bow, as distinct from the gun ?
In other words, as u see it, HOW 'd a defending homeowner
be better off if he chose one instead of the other ?

What if he missed his legs and got his middle leg

Thank u. I remain uncertain on 1 point:
what was your reasoning as to the bow, as distinct from the gun ?
In other words, as u see it, HOW 'd a defending homeowner
be better off if he chose one instead of the other ?

There was none really, I just hate the thought of "people" being able to use guns that are just "people" to protect their property... Buy more locks for doors, good fire screens for windows which knives can't get through, make the Government give a consession so that everyone can afford them.

There a better solution.