4
   

"relying on" oftentimes

 
 
Reply Sun 1 Jul, 2012 08:25 pm
"Relying on tried and proven methods oftentimes prevent lamentable consequences."
"Relying on tried and proven methods oftentimes precludes lamentable consequences. "
Why is the second sentence and not the first one right?
Thanks!
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Question • Score: 4 • Views: 859 • Replies: 15
No top replies

 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Sun 1 Jul, 2012 08:33 pm
@joseterrera,
joseterrera wrote:
"Relying on tried and proven methods oftentimes prevent lamentable consequences."
"Relying on tried and proven methods oftentimes precludes lamentable consequences. "
Why is the second sentence and not the first one right?
Thanks!
"Relying on tried and proven methods
oftentimes prevents lamentable consequences" is correct.

WELCOME to the forum, Jose.





David
McTag
 
  1  
Reply Mon 2 Jul, 2012 01:49 am
@OmSigDAVID,

David is right. The first sentence is the correct one, when you use the singular form of the verb: "Relying.....prevents lamentable consequences."

In the UK, we would not use "oftentimes". That is an American usage. "Often" is sufficient for us.
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Mon 2 Jul, 2012 02:11 am
@McTag,
We don't use it much either; close to never.
0 Replies
 
contrex
 
  1  
Reply Mon 2 Jul, 2012 11:45 am
@McTag,
McTag wrote:
In the UK, we would not use "oftentimes". That is an American usage. "Often" is sufficient for us.


It's been standard English since the 14th century, but, like many words, has fallen out of use in British English but is still going strong in the American variety.
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Mon 2 Jul, 2012 12:37 pm
@McTag,
Often is sufficient for us too.
0 Replies
 
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Mon 2 Jul, 2012 12:38 pm
@contrex,
Not in the US I have lived in, the short version being Los Angeles, New York, Washington DC, Chicago, Albuqueque. It's true that the usage exists here, but saying it is going strong is a misperception.
contrex
 
  2  
Reply Mon 2 Jul, 2012 12:41 pm
@ossobuco,
ossobuco wrote:
saying it is going strong is a misperception.


I just meant "not dead"; that is what we in the UK tend to mean by "going strong". My father is 92 and going strong. He is still alive, but he wouldn't win any athletic events (or memory contests).
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Mon 2 Jul, 2012 12:44 pm
@contrex,
Ok, thanks for clarifying. I think I've heard or read 'oft times' too.

You can tell I haven't lived in the so called US south - I've no idea if it is used more there. Of course, the US south is not related entirely to latitude, but that is another whole subject.
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Mon 2 Jul, 2012 12:47 pm
@ossobuco,
I'll add, I'm sure I've read it more than I've ever heard 'oftentimes' spoken and I've read a lot of fiction of different years.
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Mon 2 Jul, 2012 06:18 pm
@ossobuco,
Quote:
but saying it is going strong is a misperception.


I wouldn't say that, Osso. It is going strong, comparatively so. But a comparison made to 'often' isn't really fair. That's like comparing 'who' to 'whom'. They just don't occupy the same territory.

It's not archaic, it's not old slang, it's just a more formal word reserved for more formal language.
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Mon 2 Jul, 2012 10:18 pm
@ossobuco,
ossobuco wrote:

Not in the US I have lived in, the short version being Los Angeles, New York,
Washington DC, Chicago, Albuqueque. It's true that the usage
exists here, but saying it is going strong is a misperception.
AGREED. Contrex has no idea what he is talking about.
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Mon 2 Jul, 2012 10:51 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
Actually he does, Dave.

When compared to some other words taken from this thread that everyone would agree are also going strong but occupy the less frequent side of vocabulary, 'oftentimes' fares quite well.

exult - About 871,000 results

oftentimes- About 12,800,000 results

misperception - About 1,060,000 results

version - About 6,400,000,000 results

lamentable - About 2,980,000 results

consequences - About 268,000,000 results

There are lots of words that are going strong that come in lower in use than 'oftentimes'. Oftentimes, it sees little use, oftentimes it sees a greater use than other going strong words.

One of your favorite words, Dave, 'stipulate', comes in at,

stipulate - About 5,840,000 results
0 Replies
 
contrex
 
  1  
Reply Tue 3 Jul, 2012 10:27 am
@OmSigDAVID,
OmSigDAVID wrote:

Contrex has no idea what he is talking about.


I did explain what I meant by "going strong".
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Tue 3 Jul, 2012 01:13 pm
@contrex,
Not to mention that the facts supported you.
contrex
 
  1  
Reply Tue 3 Jul, 2012 01:43 pm
@JTT,
JTT wrote:

Not to mention that the facts supported you.


Being criticised by that loony David is a kind of accolade, really.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

deal - Question by WBYeats
Let pupils abandon spelling rules, says academic - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Please, I need help. - Question by imsak
Is this sentence grammatically correct? - Question by Sydney-Strock
"come from" - Question by mcook
concentrated - Question by WBYeats
 
  1. Forums
  2. » "relying on" oftentimes
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.07 seconds on 05/05/2024 at 04:52:01