1
   

I know little to nothing

 
 
Reply Fri 13 Feb, 2004 03:33 pm
Hi,
I'm new here.
Anyway, is it unethical (or at least silly) for a history student to write a paper on historical objectivity for his english class when he knows little to nothing about philisophy? or is this part of the learning process, to cause him to think about it as well as cause him to read more about the subject? opinions?
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 1,031 • Replies: 13
No top replies

 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Fri 13 Feb, 2004 03:35 pm
It is reasonable to assert that what you describe is precisely what is meant by a learning process. For aid on the topic in question, go to a search engine and look up "historiography," which is the area of endeavor in which historical objectivity is most sought after.

Welcome, Opus, please do not feed the animals, keep your hands and arms inside the windows, and avoid Gus like the plague.
0 Replies
 
joefromchicago
 
  1  
Reply Fri 13 Feb, 2004 03:54 pm
opus: If you have the chance, track down "That Noble Dream" at your local library. It might give you some useful insights.
0 Replies
 
quinn1
 
  1  
Reply Fri 13 Feb, 2004 03:54 pm
Sure..warn him about Gus but, set him free to find Slappy without regard

what is this place coming to?

Welcome BTW opus!
0 Replies
 
opus piscator
 
  1  
Reply Fri 13 Feb, 2004 04:01 pm
Joe,
that's interesting... I just got that book yesterday!
0 Replies
 
SealPoet
 
  1  
Reply Fri 13 Feb, 2004 04:01 pm
You know little to nothing about philosophy?!?

That's an execllent place to start.

Avoid Setenta like the plague. Avoid quinn1 like the plaque.

And fergawdsakes don't touch THAT! You don't know where it's been...
0 Replies
 
quinn1
 
  1  
Reply Fri 13 Feb, 2004 04:03 pm
Shocked
0 Replies
 
cavfancier
 
  1  
Reply Fri 13 Feb, 2004 05:07 pm
Welcome opus. There's nothing more boring than writing a paper you already know everything about. Go for the learning process.
0 Replies
 
Acquiunk
 
  1  
Reply Fri 13 Feb, 2004 05:48 pm
Opus, The whole purpose of those writing assignments is to allow you to explore subjects you know nothing about. By the time your paper is finished that will not be the case.

Oh, and pay no attention to the talking seal, it just hangs around eating fish and spouting poetry.
0 Replies
 
ebrown p
 
  1  
Reply Fri 13 Feb, 2004 06:05 pm
This is a very strange place to come to learn about "historical objectivity". But, I very much doubt that such a thing exists anyway. Laughing

As a former teacher I agree heartily with Acquiunk. Learning is the point of a writing assignment. This is, as you say, very much a part of the learning process.

As you read feel free to bounce ideas off of us here.

My sense is that whether it is possible to be objective is a big question and a good thing to discuss in your paper.
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Fri 13 Feb, 2004 06:17 pm
history is full of objects but thats called archaeology and you usually have to go to a museum to study them.
0 Replies
 
Acquiunk
 
  1  
Reply Fri 13 Feb, 2004 06:20 pm
...or dig them up, but then you have to put up with the flies.
0 Replies
 
OCCOM BILL
 
  1  
Reply Fri 13 Feb, 2004 06:28 pm
Welcome Opus,
I guess it's too late to warn you about Dys.
SetÂ… How exactly can you differentiate between Gus and the plague?
0 Replies
 
opus piscator
 
  1  
Reply Fri 13 Feb, 2004 06:53 pm
Thanks for the welcome
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

HAPPY ANNIVERSARY, EVERYONE! - Discussion by OmSigDAVID
WIND AND WATER - Discussion by Setanta
Who ordered the construction of the Berlin Wall? - Discussion by Walter Hinteler
True version of Vlad Dracula, 15'th century - Discussion by gungasnake
ONE SMALL STEP . . . - Discussion by Setanta
History of Gun Control - Discussion by gungasnake
Where did our notion of a 'scholar' come from? - Discussion by TuringEquivalent
 
  1. Forums
  2. » I know little to nothing
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 12/27/2024 at 01:37:53