0
   

Why used "firm anchor" but not "a firm anchor?"

 
 
Reply Sat 5 May, 2012 06:50 am

Context:


(Episode from The Language of God)
In complete honesty, I am still working on that. Perhaps
this was also an opportunity for me to recognize that I could
not truly protect my daughters from all pain and suffering; I had
to learn to entrust them to God's loving care, knowing that this
provided not an immunization from evil, but a reassurance that
their suffering would not be in vain. Indeed, my daughter would
say that this experience provided her with the opportunity and
motivation to counsel and comfort others who have gone
through the same kind of assault.
This notion that God can work through adversity is not an
easy concept, and can find firm anchor only in a worldview
that embraces a spiritual perspective. The principle of growth
through suffering is, in fact, nearly universal in the world's great
faiths. The Four Noble Truths of the Buddha in the Deer Park ser-
mon, for example, begin with "Life is suffering." For the believer,
this realization can paradoxically be a source of great comfort.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Question • Score: 0 • Views: 437 • Replies: 2
No top replies

 
contrex
 
  1  
Reply Sat 5 May, 2012 07:36 am
Because in that sentence 'anchor' is a state, like refuge or safety, not an object.

oristarA
 
  1  
Reply Sat 5 May, 2012 11:34 am
@contrex,
Thanks
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

deal - Question by WBYeats
Let pupils abandon spelling rules, says academic - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Please, I need help. - Question by imsak
Is this sentence grammatically correct? - Question by Sydney-Strock
"come from" - Question by mcook
concentrated - Question by WBYeats
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Why used "firm anchor" but not "a firm anchor?"
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 09/29/2024 at 12:25:01