1
   

Cleland drops a political grenade

 
 
Fedral
 
Reply Thu 12 Feb, 2004 03:30 pm
Cleland drops a political grenade[/u]
By:Ann Coulter
February 12, 2004

Former Sen. Max Cleland is the Democrats' designated hysteric about George Bush's National Guard service. A triple amputee and Vietnam veteran, Cleland is making the rounds on talk TV, basking in the affection of liberals who have suddenly become jock-sniffers for war veterans and working himself into a lather about President Bush's military service. Citing such renowned military experts as Molly Ivins, Cleland indignantly demands further investigation into Bush's service with the Texas Air National Guard.

Bush's National Guard service is the most thoroughly investigated event since the Kennedy assassination. But the Democrats will accept only two possible conclusions to their baseless accusations: (1) Bush was "AWOL," or (2) the matter needs further investigation.

Thirty years ago, Bush was granted an honorable discharge from the National Guard, which would seem to put the matter to rest. But liberals want proof that Bush actually deserved his honorable discharge. (Since when did the party of Bill Clinton, Ted Kennedy and Robert Byrd get so obsessed with honor?)

On "Hardball" Monday night, Cleland demanded to see Bush's pay stubs for the disputed period of time, May 1972 to May 1973. "If he was getting paid for his weekend warrior work," Cleland said, "he should have some pay stubs to show it."

The next day, the White House produced the pay stubs. This confirmed what has been confirmed 1 million times before: After taking the summer off, Bush reported for duty nine times between Nov. 29, 1972, and May 24, 1973 - more than enough times to fulfill his Guard duties. (And nine times more than Bill Clinton, Barney Frank or Chuck Schumer did during the same period.)

All this has been reported - with documentation - many times by many news organizations. George magazine had Bush's National Guard records 3 1/2 years ago.

All available evidence keeps confirming Bush's honorable service with the Guard, which leads liberals to conclude ... further investigation is needed! No evidence will ever be enough evidence. That Bush skipped out on his National Guard service is one of liberals' many nondisprovable beliefs, like global warming.

Cleland also expressed outrage that Bush left the National Guard nine months early in 1973 to go to Harvard Business School. On "Hardball," Cleland testily remarked: "I just know a whole lot of veterans who would have loved to have worked things out with the military and adjusted their tour of duty." (Cleland already knows one - Al Gore!)

When Bush left the National Guard in 1973 to go to business school, the war was over. It might as well have been 1986. Presidents Kennedy and Johnson had already lost the war, and President Nixon had ended it with the Paris peace accords in January. If Bush had demanded active combat, there was no war to send him to.

To put this in perspective, by 1973, John Kerry had already accused American soldiers of committing war crimes in Vietnam, thrown someone else's medals to the ground in an anti-war demonstration, and married his first heiress. Bill Clinton had just finished three years of law school and was about to embark upon a political career - which would include campaign events with Max Cleland.

Moreover, if we're going to start delving into exactly who did what back then, maybe Max Cleland should stop allowing Democrats to portray him as a war hero who lost his limbs taking enemy fire on the battlefields of Vietnam.

Cleland lost three limbs in an accident during a routine noncombat mission where he was about to drink beer with friends. He saw a grenade on the ground and picked it up. He could have done that at Fort Dix. In fact, Cleland could have dropped a grenade on his foot as a National Guardsman - or what Cleland sneeringly calls "weekend warriors." Luckily for Cleland's political career and current pomposity about Bush, he happened to do it while in Vietnam.

There is more than a whiff of dishonesty in how Cleland is presented to the American people. Terry McAuliffe goes around saying, "Max Cleland, a triple amputee who left three limbs on the battlefield of Vietnam," was thrown out of office because Republicans "had the audacity to call Max Cleland unpatriotic." Mr. Cleland, a word of advice: When a slimy weasel like Terry McAuliffe is vouching for your combat record, it's time to sound "retreat" on that subject.

Needless to say, no one ever challenged Cleland's "patriotism." His performance in the Senate was the issue, which should not have come as a bolt out of the blue inasmuch as he was running for re-election to the Senate. Sen. Cleland had refused to vote for the Homeland Security bill unless it was chock-full of pro-union perks that would have jeopardized national security. ("OH, MY GOD! A HIJACKED PLANE IS HEADED FOR THE WHITE HOUSE!" "Sorry, I'm on my break. Please call back in two hours.")

The good people of Georgia - who do not need lectures on admiring military service - gave Cleland one pass for being a Vietnam veteran. He didn't get a lifetime pass.

Indeed, if Cleland had dropped a grenade on himself at Fort Dix rather than in Vietnam, he would never have been a U.S. senator in the first place. Maybe he'd be the best pharmacist in Atlanta, but not a U.S. senator. He got into office on the basis of serving in Vietnam and was thrown out for his performance as a senator.

Cleland wore the uniform, he was in Vietnam, and he has shown courage by going on to lead a productive life. But he didn't "give his limbs for his country," or leave them "on the battlefield." There was no bravery involved in dropping a grenade on himself with no enemy troops in sight. That could have happened in the Texas National Guard - which Cleland denigrates while demanding his own sanctification.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 975 • Replies: 13
No top replies

 
PDiddie
 
  1  
Reply Thu 12 Feb, 2004 03:46 pm
So what did Max Cleland do during the Viet Nam war?

No one should rely on the vile, foul Coulter for the real story, that's for sure:

Quote:
"Awarded: Silver Star; Date Action: 4 April 1968; Theater: Republic of Vietnam

"Action: For gallantry in action while engaged in military operations involving conflict with an armed hostile force in the Republic of Vietnam. Captain Cleland distinguished himself by exceptionally valorous action on 4 April 1968, while serving as communications officer of the 2nd Battalion, 12th Calvary during an enemy attack near Khe Sanh, Republic of Vietnam.

"When the battalion command post came under a heavy enemy rocket and mortar attack, Capt. Cleland, disregarding his own safety, exposed himself to the rocket barrage as he left his covered position to administer first aid to his wounded comrades. He then assisted in moving the injured personnel to covered positions. Continuing to expose himself, Capt. Cleland organized his men into a work party to repair the battalion communications equipment which had been damaged by enemy fire. His gallant action is in keeping with the highest traditions of the military service, and reflects great credit upon himself, his unit, and the United States Army ... While disembarking from a transport helicopter, Capt. Cleland reached for a grenade he believed had become dislodged from his web gear. Later it was discovered that the grenade belonged to a young soldier new to the theater. That soldier had improperly prepared the grenade pin for easy detonation and had dropped it while coming off the helicopter. The grenade exploded and severely injured Capt. Cleland.

The Silver Star is the third-highest valor decoration of the United States. Sen. Cleland also was awarded a Soldier's Medal, Bronze Star, Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960), Vietnam Service Medal, National Defense Service Medal and Parachutist Badge.


I hope in my travels and travails I never encounter the esteemed Ann Coulter.

I will spit in her face if I should. Twisted Evil
0 Replies
 
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Thu 12 Feb, 2004 03:48 pm
Coulter has got an armed grenade in her pants.
0 Replies
 
willow tl
 
  1  
Reply Thu 12 Feb, 2004 04:14 pm
She is a truly vile human being and a liar!
0 Replies
 
petunia555555
 
  1  
Reply Thu 12 Feb, 2004 04:57 pm
P-Diddie, thank you for that enlightening information...it is amazing that you could find that info...and Ms. Coulter was unable to. I wonder if she had read anything about him or if it was just something she overheard in conversation...maybe it was when they were trying to get him, Mr. Cleland out of office....imagine his lack of patriotism, trying to stand up for the working people, making sure they had security in their jobs!
0 Replies
 
husker
 
  1  
Reply Thu 12 Feb, 2004 05:01 pm
You need to find a page like this:
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Thu 12 Feb, 2004 05:52 pm
She speaks the same amount of truth that Micheal Moore does. She is much easier on the eyes though.
0 Replies
 
hobitbob
 
  1  
Reply Thu 12 Feb, 2004 05:56 pm
Y'know, your choice in women is pretty scary. Hillary and Coulter are not the type I would likely fall for even if really drunk. I suppose meditating on their visages would delay the inevitable, but other than for that purpose....
Now Anna Kournikova, on the other hand...there's a cutie!
0 Replies
 
Brand X
 
  1  
Reply Thu 12 Feb, 2004 06:02 pm
Anna not Ann for me too.
0 Replies
 
hobitbob
 
  1  
Reply Thu 12 Feb, 2004 06:03 pm
Brand X wrote:
Anna not Ann for me too.

No way, man...you'd get her dirty!
0 Replies
 
Brand X
 
  1  
Reply Thu 12 Feb, 2004 06:05 pm
Hopefully!
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Fri 13 Feb, 2004 07:56 am
hobitbob wrote:
Y'know, your choice in women is pretty scary. Hillary and Coulter are not the type I would likely fall for even if really drunk. I suppose meditating on their visages would delay the inevitable, but other than for that purpose....


Yes, I can understand that you would prefer Moore to Coulter. That has been made very apparent.
0 Replies
 
willow tl
 
  1  
Reply Fri 13 Feb, 2004 08:00 am
What is apparent Mcgentrix is you follow your party blindly without checking facts...says more about you than your choice of bed partners..:-)
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Fri 13 Feb, 2004 08:07 am
McG

Truly, what sort of passages from Moore can you find for us which stoop to the sort of personal slanders, and purposeful falsehoods, and constant ad hominems, as Coulter?
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Cleland drops a political grenade
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/17/2024 at 01:38:56