@north,
First I will address my response and then yours.
I saw 'what you were getting at' but chose not to go down that dead end with you. It is a dead end and allows no possibility for genuine thought, regardless of whether or not you're in the mood to admit it.
Second, I am now questioning whether you even know what you mean by 'truth'. Saying that some 'thing' is true only exists because of the possibility of being able to empirically verify a lack of 'evidence'. And of course the lack of evidence only 'shows up' because of the pre-supposition of there being 'truth'. BOTH are phony and are the avoidance of something.
The avoidance of you dis-covering your ownmost possibility, the possibility of coming face-to-face with the possibility of the impossibility of your own existence, the possibility of Be-ing.