@Joe Nation,
Joe Nation wrote:Yeah, right...if you ever....ppphhhffttt//
How much r u gonna pay me to
RESEARCH it???????????
Joe Nation wrote:Meanwhile, here a lady being attacked in her home who fired warning shots
at her estranged abusive husband.
No, Joe: your link said that she was convicted of attempted murder;
that is not the same as firing "warning shots".
I don 't know the facts of the case well enuf to judge them yet.
I 'd like to read the court's decision.
(Maybe u 'll tell us whether he was
slamming her brain
against the street, when she shot at him???)
I suspect that u imply
that Mr. Z's judge woud follow that lead;
maybe, but not necessarily.
I doubt that u attribute as much respect
to randomly different points of vu
among different judges as that factor
deserves.
I have known judges to
disagree among themselves with great
ENERGY.
The concept that in America, we have a government of
LAWS,
not of men, is a lot more
THEORETICAL than it is found to be true in practice.
Joe Nation wrote: 2) told not to pursue Martin
Do u
imply that the police telefone operator had
AUTHORITY over defendant,
to tell him what to pursue and what not to pursue????
If u imply that, then I hope that u will
reveal the source of this jurisdiction to us.
Is it a statute??
Is it in the common law?
Is it in the Constitution of Florida, under "telefone operators"??
Joe Nation wrote:3) fired only one lethal shot.
I don't mean to gloat but David....
Joe(I am picking out restaurants)Nation
I 'm getting hungry
ALREADY!
U know, in retrospect, it occurs to me that
we share a commonality of misfortune,
in that our favored ladies have rejected us both
and we have both posted thereof in this forum.
David
