45
   

Do you think Zimmerman will be convicted of murder?

 
 
cicerone imposter
 
  0  
Reply Tue 1 May, 2012 12:56 pm
@BillRM,
Your myopia only proves your bigotry.
BillRM
 
  0  
Reply Tue 1 May, 2012 01:16 pm
@firefly,
Quote:
It is telling that, on these boards, you have attacked laws--like rape/sexual assault laws, drunk driving laws, and laws prohibiting child pornography---laws that practically everyone supports and agrees are necessary--as being "crazy laws


Oh once more just for the public record my problems with the CP laws are share for the most part by the majority of the Federal bench at least by the public polls of the Federal judges.

The UK laws seems far more sane on the subject.

Next I question if most people support expansing our rapes laws to cover rape for reasons of regret after the event.

I had never had a problem with the old meaning of rape as in rape by force, threat of force or drugging someone behind their back for sex.

Next I think that the federal government had force the BAC for DUI below what it should be and the issue of setting that limit should be return to the states.

Somehow I do not think that most people agree with the Federal government blackmailing the states over such issues.

Now back to charging someone for the 'crime' of self defense.

0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  0  
Reply Tue 1 May, 2012 01:21 pm
@firefly,
firefly wrote:
People who think like you are the reason they are now in the process of re-examining
the very problematic Stand Your Ground law in the state of Florida.

It is telling that, on these boards, you have attacked laws--like rape/sexual assault laws, drunk driving laws,
and laws prohibiting child pornography---laws that practically everyone supports and agrees are necessary--as being "crazy laws".
It sounds like Bill has taken a CONSISTENTLY pro-freedom, pro-Americanism stance.
(I cannot comment on what he said qua rape, for my paucity of knowledge of what he said.)

Firefly, if u have friends or loved ones who are violent, predatory criminals,
then it makes sense that u choose to decry, malign & denounce Stand Your Ground Laws;
your complaints favor for the predators and threaten the innocent.




firefly wrote:
But, the one law you choose to champion, Florida's Stand Your Ground law,
is a law which is so poorly written that it is quite arguably a "crazy law",
and a law that many officials in the state of Florida now realize must be corrected and revised.
This is true, from the perspective of working violent criminals, robbers & burglars,
who are put at greater risk, when their victims DARE to fight back.
I am for the GOOD GUYS; I support the victims' rights to fight back,
firefly
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 May, 2012 01:36 pm
@cicerone imposter,
Quote:
It was not necessary to pursue Trayvon, because his father lives there. Zimmer wanted an altercation.

It's also hard to claim immunity under Stand Your Ground when you were the one who did the pursuing.
Zimmerman may not have wanted an altercation, but he certainly seems to have wanted a confrontation, since he did the pursing.

And even Zimmerman's own lawyer has said that he's not sure that Stand Your Ground even applies under those circumstances.

It was appropriate to arrest him.

And, since he will likely have an immunity hearing, it will be up to a judge whether or not to dismiss the charges. If the judge doesn't dismiss the charges, it will go to trial.

The system is now operating just as it should. BillRM really has nothing to bitch about, Zimmerman will have his day in court.


BillRM
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 May, 2012 01:38 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
Quote:
It sounds like Bill has taken a CONSISTENTLY pro-freedom, pro-Americanism stance.
(I cannot comment on what he said qua rape, for my paucity of knowledge of what he said.)


Thank David and if you look up the meanings of ad hominem attacks you are likely to get links to Firefly postings as examples.
0 Replies
 
BillRM
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 May, 2012 01:41 pm
@firefly,
Quote:
It's also hard to claim immunity under Stand Your Ground when you were the one who did the pursuing.
Zimmerman may not have wanted an altercation, but he certainly seems to have wanted a confrontation, since he did the pursing.


LOL that is why he call 911 to get police officers on the scene.

Good try but other then trying to keep an eye on Trayvon I see no wish by Zimmerman to have any interaction with Trayvon of any kind.
BillRM
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 May, 2012 01:57 pm
http://articles.nydailynews.com/2012-04-12/news/31332932_1_murder-charge-pretrial-hearing-richard-hornsby

Zimmerman is charged, but will he be convicted?
Thursday, April 12, 2012
SANFORD, Fla. -- After an extraordinary public campaign to make an arrest in the shooting of an unarmed black teen, a Florida prosecutor came back with a murder charge in the case that has galvanized the nation for weeks.

But prosecutors face steep hurdles to win a second-degree murder conviction against neighborhood watch volunteer George Zimmerman in the killing of Trayvon Martin, experts say. They will have to prove Zimmerman intentionally went after Martin instead of shooting him in self-defense, refute arguments that a Florida law empowered him to use deadly force and get past a judge's ruling at a pretrial hearing.

Zimmerman, 28, who turned himself in at a county jail Wednesday after prosecutor Angela Corey announced the charge, was to appear before a magistrate Thursday and plead not guilty in the Feb. 26 shooting of the 17-year-old that set off a nationwide debate about racial profiling and the rights to self-defense.

"He is concerned about getting a fair trial and a fair presentation," his attorney, Mark O'Mara said. "He is a client who has a lot of hatred focused on him. I'm hoping the hatred settles down ... he has the right to his own safety and the case being tried before a judge and jury."

Legal experts said Corey chose a tough route with the murder charge, which could send Zimmerman to prison for life if he's convicted, over manslaughter, which usually carries 15-year prison terms and covers reckless or negligent killings.

The prosecutors must prove Zimmerman's shooting of Martin was rooted in hatred or ill will and counter his claims that he shot Martin to protect himself while patrolling his gated community in the Orlando suburb of Sanford. Zimmerman's lawyers would only have to prove by a preponderance of evidence - a relatively low legal standard - that he acted in self-defense at a pretrial hearing to prevent the case from going to trial.

There's a "high likelihood it could be dismissed by the judge even before the jury gets to hear the case," Florida defense attorney Richard Hornsby said.
0 Replies
 
firefly
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 May, 2012 02:17 pm
@cicerone imposter,
BillRM's myopia not only reveals his bigotry, it reveals problems with his ability to distinguish reality from his own fantasies.

Because BillRM chooses to believe Zimmerman's account (an account he never heard first hand, or even in it's entirety), he illogically concludes that his belief constitutes some sort of compelling evidence in this case. And he thinks that if he repeats his belief over and over and over, it's somehow becoming true and convincing.
The only thing he presents compelling evidence for are his own obsessive-compulsive traits, his concrete level of thought, and his inability to intellectually handle any subject that has ambiguity or gray areas.

The gun lobby certainly has a vested interest in supporting Zimmerman, and the problematic Stand Your Ground law, regardless of the truth in this case, because people like BillRM, a man with a mini-arsenal in his home, are mainly concerned with protecting their own gun-toting interests and any legal judgments against Zimmerman are seen as being against those interests. Zimmerman might have acted completely recklessly in killing Trayvon Martin, something BillRM is totally unable to even consider, and BillRM would still support him--because he thinks "we are all Zimmerman". He can't even distinguish between Zimmerman and himself.

And, in BillRM's tortured logic, which matches his tortured prose, if Zimmerman killed Trayvon, that proves Trayvon deserved to be killed. The need to legally search for the truth of what happened, and the real circumstances of that homicide, completely eludes him--he's clueless--he thinks it's sufficient to wave a photo of a bald head and proclaim, "Case closed!". That's about the level of his understanding of the legal system and the law--and it's rock bottom--he's totally out of his depth.

What BillRM fails to see is that we are also all Trayvon Martin.

And none of us deserves to have our lives taken from us, by a man with a gun, without adequate legal justification for the act. And it remains to be seen whether George Zimmerman can provide that justification for his act in a court of law.

This case is now it court, where it should have been all along.
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 May, 2012 02:20 pm
@BillRM,
Quote:
It's also hard to claim immunity under Stand Your Ground when you were the one who did the pursuing.
Zimmerman may not have wanted an altercation, but he certainly seems to have wanted a confrontation, since he did the pursing.
BillRM wrote:
LOL that is why he call 911 to get police officers on the scene.

Good try but other then trying to keep an eye on Trayvon I see no wish by Zimmerman
to have any interaction with Trayvon of any kind.
IF Zimmy had really wanted to assassinate a total stranger,
it is unlikely that he 'd call police to the scene, to find him with a smoking gun over the corpse.
Has that EVER happened b4 ????





David
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 May, 2012 02:22 pm
@gungasnake,
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18032242

Quote:
Myths about the Country Walk case.
Cheit RE, Mervis D.
Source

Department of Political Science and Public Policy, Brown University, USA. [email protected]
Abstract

The Country Walk case in Dade County, Florida was long considered a model for how to prosecute a multi-victim child sexual abuse case involving young children. In the past 10 years, however, a contrary view has emerged that the case was tainted by improper interviewing and was likely a false conviction. This is the first scholarly effort to assess the competing views of this case.




Maybe you should stick to claiming one of Mars' moon is an alien space station.
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 May, 2012 02:27 pm
@parados,
parados wrote:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18032242

Quote:
Myths about the Country Walk case.
Cheit RE, Mervis D.
Source

Department of Political Science and Public Policy, Brown University, USA. [email protected]
Abstract

The Country Walk case in Dade County, Florida was long considered a model for how to prosecute a multi-victim child sexual abuse case involving young children. In the past 10 years, however, a contrary view has emerged that the case was tainted by improper interviewing and was likely a false conviction. This is the first scholarly effort to assess the competing views of this case.




Maybe you should stick to claiming one of Mars' moon is an alien space station.
A LITTLE OFF-TOPIC, R WE ????
0 Replies
 
firefly
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 May, 2012 02:49 pm
Quote:
Citing Its “Uses and Abuses,” Rival Task Forces Duel Over Florida’s Stand Your Ground Law
FlaglerLive
May 1, 2012

As a task force formed by Gov. Rick Scott to review the “stand your ground” law prepares for its first meeting today, a rival panel convened by Democratic state Sen. Chris Smith found that the law needs significant revision.

“We took an adult look at ‘stand your ground,’ and we had adult discussions – not political,” Smith said Monday. “And I think we’re giving good direction to the Legislature on what should be done.”

Some panelists called for an outright repeal of “stand your ground,” but Smith said there wasn’t enough support to make that recommendation.

The recommendations call for lawmakers to require a grand jury review of “stand your ground” cases and to let law enforcement officers detain those who claim the law as a defense while an investigation is conducted.

“That’s what we mean by ambiguity – and a little bit of the absurdity of this law,” Smith said. “If you’re standing there and someone’s dead, to have police have to wonder, ‘Can I detain this person?’ is a concern.”

Smith said he started his own task force on April 5 after tiring of waiting for Scott to act on the Feb. 26 shooting of unarmed black teen Trayvon Martin and the delay in arresting acknowledged shooter George Zimmerman, a neighborhood watch volunteer.

Since then, special prosecutor Angela Corey has charged Zimmerman with second-degree murder, and Scott has named a panel chaired by Lt. Gov. Jennifer Carroll, who voted for the 2005 “stand your ground” law while serving in the Legislature.

Meanwhile Smith, a Fort Lauderdale Democrat, convened an 18-member panel of lawyers, judges and law professors, and on Monday released their report.

“There is ample and overwhelming documentation of the law’s use, and more importantly, its abuse,” the report concludes. “The Sanford shooting should not have been a cause for delay; to the contrary, it was a compelling call to action that something needed to be done about the law’s confusing and often misapplied provisions.”

Smith is also pushing for a special session of the Legislature to review and amend the law.

“I think it’s still a public safety concern,” he said.

Smith said he will give the recommendations to Scott, Carroll, the members of the governor’s task force and Senate President Mike Haridopolos, R-Merritt Island.

Critics of the Scott panel say it’s top-heavy with supporters of the National Rifle Association, which spearheaded the effort to make Florida the first state in the nation to adopt the “stand your ground” legislation.

Last week state Rep. Dwight Bullard, D-Miami, asked Scott to change the composition of his task force by removing at least one of the legislators who backed the law. That could be House sponsor Dennis Baxley, R-Ocala, or Sen. David Simmons, R-Maitland, who co-sponsored the law.

Smith, Bullard, Sen. Arthenia Joyner, D-Tampa and other black lawmakers say they have tried to become members of the Scott panel, to no avail.

“We have tapped a diverse and qualified group to carefully review our laws and our policies,” Scott said on April 19, announcing his selections. None of his appointees are lawmakers who favor gun control.

Smith said he’d requested the opportunity to give the recommendations directly to the panel Tuesday, but was told no public comment would be part of the inaugural meeting.

His panel’s recommendations are broken down into unanimous, consensus and minority findings.

These findings of the Smith task force were unanimous:

-Cases should be presented to a grand jury to allow for a cross section of society to determine what a reasonable person would do in that case.
-Educate the public and law enforcement.
-Create a system to track self-defense claims in Florida.
-Add language requiring an “imminent” danger provision throughout the statute.
-Change the “Defense of Others” wording in the law’s title to “Defense of Property.”
-Allow law enforcement to detain someone who uses the Stand Your Ground defense while they investigate.

Consensus findings included eliminating the presumption of reasonable fear and clarifying the role of provocation in the law’s application.
http://flaglerlive.com/37668/stand-your-ground/
0 Replies
 
BillRM
 
  0  
Reply Tue 1 May, 2012 03:14 pm
@firefly,
Quote:
And none of us deserves to have our lives taken from us, by a man with a gun, without adequate legal justification for the act


An none of us deserve to be charge with murder for the crime of self defense due to political pressures by the likes of Sharpton with the help of the media.

The pressure was not for a more complete investigation but for arresting Zimmerman no matter what.

We are all Zimmerman except for those who think they had a right to attack someone for following them.

When I was 17 and even now I would never dream of attacking someone for following me no matter how concern I might had been over the follower motivations.

Let see Trayvon could had call 911, call his home and ask someone to drive over and meet him, or just keep walking home.

He did none of those things instead he got into a fight where at one point he was trying to drive Zimmerman head into the ground.

Not a hard case to figure out given that the one person who wished for the police to come to the scene was Zimmerman.
cicerone imposter
 
  2  
Reply Tue 1 May, 2012 03:22 pm
@BillRM,
You wrote,
Quote:
An none of us deserve to be charge with murder for the crime of self defense.


We are not arguing with this statement; we're challenging your conclusions.
You will probably still miss the nuances.
georgeob1
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 May, 2012 03:58 pm
A conviction for second degree murder requires that the state prove (to a jury's satisfaction) that Zimmerman wrongfully (that is with some motive other than self-defense) intended to kill the deceased here. I don't presume to know all the facts here or to judge based on the evidence that has been widely published. However, it appears to me that proving this in the circumstances so far described in the press will be very difficult at best for the prosecution. Charges of manslaughter might be proved with much less difficulty, and I don't know the Florida law with respect to the possibility of a reduced finding. Is it all or nothing with respect to Second Degree Murder????
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 May, 2012 03:59 pm
@georgeob1,
Nope, prosecutors can add on lesser charges at any time, and frequently do so.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
firefly
 
  2  
Reply Tue 1 May, 2012 04:34 pm
@cicerone imposter,
BillRM still doesn't understand that there is a difference between what he believes took place, and what actually occurred between Martin and Zimmerman.

He wants to be able to shoot and kill, and have no questions asked about it. That's why he keeps prattling about his need for weapons of "self defense", and tells us about all of his guns, and chooses to ignore problems and abuses with the Stand Your Ground law that Florida officials are now addressing. He's spouting the NRA and gun lobby party line, and not really focusing on this particular case, in which lawyers have acknowledged that Stand Your Ground might not even apply.

He'll just keep mindlessly repeating the same things over and over and over and over, like a broken record. Come back next week, he'll still be repeating the same things.

Meanwhile, the outcry over the Trayvon Martin killing has sparked interest in whether other deaths merited further investigation and legal action--particularly where the victims were black.
Quote:
Trayvon Martin case spurs other investigations
By FRANCES ROBLES
Miami Herald
May 1, 2012

Kenneth Chamberlain Jr.'s foray into activism started with a Facebook post.
Someone placed a petition demanding the arrest of Trayvon Martin's killer on Chamberlain's Facebook wall, and that got the New York behavior counselor thinking: What about his own dad's unprosecuted killing?

"I signed Trayvon's petition, sat back, and thought, 'Well, maybe I should do a petition,'" he said. "I did and got 1,000 signatures. I was happy with 1,000."
Then came more: Five months after Chamberlain's father was killed in his home by a White Plains, N.Y., police officer, Chamberlain has not only 208,000 online signatures -- he got a grand jury investigation as well.

Across the nation, experts say people disillusioned by the criminal justice system were galvanized by the Trayvon Martin case and took to the Internet to demand that police and prosecutors take a second look at questionable shootings. From New York to Chicago, Atlanta, North Carolina and elsewhere, people whose relatives were killed by cops, zealous security guards or neighbors are inundating law enforcement officials with online petitions, calls from attorneys and rallies.

With Trayvon's killer, George Zimmerman, now facing second-degree murder charges, cases that activists say would otherwise have been swept under the rug are gaining new momentum. Social media tools allow anyone to start a petition and keep in touch with the people who signed. Experts say that has played a key role in spreading the word about other killings and helped empower victims, who are often poor and black.

The phenomenon has lifted the veil on dozens of questionable shootings around the nation where police or prosecutors carried out lackluster investigations or were perceived to have protected law enforcement, activists said.

"This is a message to law enforcement: Families are no longer powerless," said Steven Biel, director of SignOn.org, the online petition site associated with MoveOn.org. "These petitions offer a way to send emails and organize people in an ongoing way. That's the most exciting thing: It's not just petitions, but organizing rallies and making sure the targets understand this is not just a bunch of people clicking a mouse."

Kenneth Chamberlain Sr., 68, was killed Nov. 19 after police went to his apartment responding to a medical alert alarm. An agitated Chamberlain would not let police in, so after a standoff that lasted an hour and a half, police removed the door. Police accused the retired corrections officer and former Marine of coming at them with an axe. Officers tasered him, shot him with a beanbag shotgun and then killed him with a live round.

The audio of the entire episode was recorded by the medical alert company, which caught the officers using racial epithets and the elder Chamberlain telling a black police officer: "Black officer, why are you letting them do this? Why are your guns drawn?" attorney Randolph McLaughlin said. Video also was captured from the police Tasers.

The Westchester District Attorney declined to comment on the case, saying just that it is being presented to a grand jury. The five-month delay was necessary to gather forensic reports and other evidence, spokesman Lucien Chalfen said.
"It's been investigated from the beginning," Chalfen said. "It did not take a long time to take to a grand jury. It's within the margin of error for the appropriate length of time."

Although Chamberlain's shooting has stark differences from Trayvon's, the two have been likened as incidents where media attention and activism are credited for reopening investigations.

"They are killing young men in Florida and killing old men in New York, but there are significant differences in the cases," said McLaughlin, an attorney with the law firm Newman Ferrara in New York. "There are also similarities: Trayvon was walking while black, while Mr. Chamberlain was just living while black."

Treka McMillian was inspired by the Chamberlain online drive to start a petition of her own. Her goddaughter, Jasmine Thar, a 16-year-old high school sophomore, was killed two days before Christmas in Chadbourn, N.C., when a man across the street said his rifle went off by accident.
The bullet struck Jasmine, McMillian, and another 17-year-old. No arrests have been made.

"I don't care if it was an accident -- still someone should be held accountable: Someone shot somebody," said McMillian, a college women's basketball coach. "You don't want to make it about race, but you have to think that if a black person shot two kids, they'd be arrested."

Jasmine was black, and the shooter is white.

The Justice for Jasmine petition on SignOn.org now has more than 70,000 signatures. McMillian recently learned that the FBI will investigate the matter, and the district attorney agreed to meet with the dead teen's family.
"I didn't want it pushed under the rug and not dealt with," she said.

The Change.org petition launched by Trayvon Martin's parents after his Feb. 26 shooting ultimately gathered 2.2 million signatures. With Zimmerman now before the criminal justice system, the petition drive will be logged as a successful campaign, said Jon Perri, senior organizer for criminal justice at Change.org.

Dozens of petitions have sprung up since, including several for and against Florida's Stand Your Ground law. Several drives have taken up the cause of Rekia Boyd, a 22-year-old Chicago woman shot by an off-duty police officer.
The officer claimed self defense because he was in a dispute with another man.

"I think overall there are people concerned and frustrated with the criminal justice system for a variety of reasons," Perri said. "A lot people feel that if they don't have money, they feel they have nowhere to turn. This platform is opening the floodgates."

Trayvon's parents' attorney, Benjamin Crump, agreed.
"I would say I have gotten 20 calls at least," he said. "You hear these cases, young men -- black and Hispanic -- getting killed in very suspicious circumstances. They are often poor minorities, and it's rare that I see a full impartial hearing."

In the Bronx, activists are hoping the shooting of an unarmed 18-year-old killed in his grandmother's apartment gains the kind of momentum Trayvon's killing did. The Bronx district attorney is investigating why police followed Ramarley Graham into his apartment and knocked down the door and killed him, but no arrests have been made in the February shooting.

Graham was killed in the bathroom, where he was disposing of marijuana. The case has brought new attention to the New York Police Department's "stop and frisk" policies that activists say inordinately target blacks and Hispanics.
Graham's family's attorney, Jeffrey Emdin, said he deliberately scaled back publicity so that if a case ever goes before jurors, defense lawyers would not argue for a change of venue. But when hundreds of thousands of people hit the streets for Trayvon, the comparisons were quickly made and the momentum picked up.

http://www.bradenton.com/2012/05/01/4020467/trayvon-martin-case-spurs-other.html#storylink=cpy


I think the use of public pressure in this way is very appropriate--just as it was in the case of Trayvon Martin. Certain segments of the population may be systematically disadvantaged, or unequally treated, by the criminal justice system, and this sort of activism raises awareness and forces public officials to be answerable to the public they serve, as they should be.




firefly
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 May, 2012 04:37 pm
@georgeob1,
Quote:
I don't know the Florida law with respect to the possibility of a reduced finding. Is it all or nothing with respect to Second Degree Murder????

A jury would be able to find him guilty of manslaughter rather than second degree murder--it would be a lesser included charge.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 May, 2012 04:49 pm
@firefly,
Here's model instruction on second degree murder from the 9th circuit.

http://archive.ca9.uscourts.gov/web/sdocuments.nsf/0/5fa12002b677efff882564bb0003e807?OpenDocument
0 Replies
 
BillRM
 
  -2  
Reply Tue 1 May, 2012 05:12 pm
@firefly,
Quote:
--just as it was in the case of Trayvon Martin. Certain segments of the population may be systematically disadvantaged, or unequally treated, by the criminal justice system, and this sort of activism raises awareness and forces public officials to be answerable to the public they serve, as they should be.


Strange as you love and had supported the criminal justice system that had resulted in a million black men in prison and love long sentences for nor-violence crimes and love forcing the poor guilty or innocent to be pressure into plea deals.

You had attack little old me time after time for having problems with this so call justice system and it long sentences and many unfairness.

Now instead of making the whole system fairer for everyone you wish to level the playing field by bringing the unfairness of the legal system aim at our poor and mostly black citizens to everyone but the rich.

I can understand and support a call for a full and complete investigation of the Transvon/Zimmerman matter but not a demand for Zimmerman arrested no matter what.

Sharpton and his likes did not help the black community by his call for a list of outstanding white men to be arrested in 1980s for a gang rape of a 15 years old that never happen in New York.

Sharpton and his likes did not help by supporting a riot aim at Jews for a car accident and the call for the driver to be arrested for an accident.

Sharpton and his like did not help the black community by calling for the arrest of three innocent white men for a gang rape that never happen at Duke.

An on an on..................as in the Zimmerman case.

Blacks need some of the funds now being spend in keeping a million of them in prison to be spend on paying for their education and health and so on and a fairer and more sane justice system for everyone.

Oh and the black community have to understand it is not the police or whites that are killing their young men it is instead other black young men and they need to address this sickness in their own culture.




 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.25 seconds on 11/18/2024 at 06:48:28