1
   

CNN Says It Overplayed Dean's Iowa Scream

 
 
Reply Mon 9 Feb, 2004 11:54 am
CNN Says It Overplayed Dean's Iowa Scream
Sun Feb 8,12:11 PM ET
By DAVID BAUDER, AP Television Writer

NEW YORK - It probably means little now to Howard Dean (news - web sites), but CNN's top executive believes his network overplayed the infamous clip of Dean's "scream" after the Iowa caucuses.

"It was a big story, but the challenge in a 24-hour news network is that you try to keep all of your different viewers throughout the day informed without overdoing it," said Princell Hair, CNN's general manager.

The breathtaking media explosion turned the former Democratic presidential front-runner into a punch line and arguably hastened his campaign's free fall. It's also an instructive look at how television news and entertainment works today.

Whatever handwringing there may be in retrospect ?- and there's only a little ?- comes with a sense that repeats are inevitable.

"It was unfair," said Joe Trippi, Dean's former campaign manager, who lost his job in the fallout. "It was totally unfair. I don't think there was any question about it."

Trippi accepts that the footage was newsworthy, but he figured it was a one-day story.

Instead, the cable and broadcast news networks aired Dean's Iowa exclamation 633 times ?- and that doesn't include local news or talk shows ?- in the four days after it was made, according to the Hotline, a Washington-based newsletter.

"It shouldn't be an anvil that you keep hammering to destroy his candidacy," Trippi said. "I don't think there was a big conspiracy to do that, but that's what was going on."

Sitting in his Manhattan apartment watching the Iowa caucus coverage, Conan O'Brien saw Dean's speech and thought: Ooh, this is odd.

The NBC "Late Night" host immediately figured he'd be joking about it the next day, and he did, "interviewing" a raving Dean impersonator.

He wasn't alone.

David Letterman ran a clip that appeared to show Dean's head exploding. Jay Leno quipped: "I'm not an expert in politics, but I think it's a bad sign when your speech ends with your aides shooting you with a tranquilizer gun."

The cable news networks ran and reran the video clip. They analyzed it. They ran footage of the late-night comedians joking about it. They played the instant Internet songs that sampled Dean's shout.

Virtually overnight, the "I Have a Scream" speech became legend.

"With so many competitive 24-hour news channels and so many competitive talk shows, if you add the two together, it's a nuclear reaction," O'Brien said. "Once the core gets so hot, there's no stopping it."

It took on such a life, said Paul Slavin, senior vice president of ABC News, that "the amount of attention it was receiving necessitated more attention."

Neither Slavin nor Mark Lukasiewicz, NBC News executive producer in charge of political coverage, believe the coverage was overdone. Roger Ailes, Fox News chairman, told ABC News it was "overplayed a bit."

While it's impossible to blame any one network or reporter, CBS News President Andrew Heyward said, the cumulative effect was the event was covered more than editorially justified.

"It's just inherent in the structure of the news media today, especially with the role that 24-hour cable plays," Heyward said. "Cable thrives on repetition and, let's be kind, exhaustive analysis, which has to constantly be freshened. If there's a powerful piece of video to fuel it, it's going to be repeated even more."

News networks can do the same thing for footage that many consider positive, like when President Bush landed on an aircraft carrier to declare the combat phase of the Iraq war over, Lukasiewicz said.

Only 39 percent of Dean's coverage on the network evening news was positive during the week after Iowa, according to an analysis by the Center for Media and Public Affairs. By contrast, rival John Edwards (news - web sites)' coverage was 86 percent positive during the same period, and new front-runner John Kerry's was 71 percent positive, the center said.

A speech where Dean was showing exuberance ?- not anger ?- was pointed to by rivals as a sign that he didn't have the temperament to be president, Trippi said, and this echoed throughout the media.

To Dean's misfortune, the moment crystallized concerns that voters were already having about him, news executives said.

"If he made the very same speech three days before Iowa, it wouldn't have resonated," Slavin said. "It wouldn't have resonated because he was the leader there and it did not in any way, shape or form epitomize the campaign in everybody's mind."

Trippi regards the argument that the speech received so much coverage because it symbolized the campaign's troubles as a rationalization.

"It was like the footage of a heat-seeking missile hitting its target," he said. "Once the press gets that, it just gets played over and over again for a week, and people say, `How cool.' That's what I think happened here. It was entertainment masquerading as news."

Heyward said he believed the event helped accelerate Dean's decline ?- "not so much showing the speech again and again, as the kind of collective wisdom that suggested that it was extremely damaging and, to a degree, became a self-fulfilling prophecy."

The lesson for the media in cases like this is to be aware of its own impact, he said.

Still, politicians and newsmakers had better get used to a lightning-fast media world.

"They'll just do it again," O'Brien said. "The toothpaste is out of the tube. This is the world we're in now."

Slavin said his only regret was not airing an intriguing Diane Sawyer report on the coverage earlier. Sawyer reported that Dean was using a special microphone that night that filters out crowd noise to heighten his voice; other videotapes taken illustrate that his "scream" was barely audible to his live audience.

To Trippi, Sawyer's report felt like a Super Bowl referee admitting ?- after the game ?- that he blew a call that decided the outcome.

"Unfortunately, no one ran that 633 times," he said. "ABC, to its credit, did it once."
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 1,715 • Replies: 31
No top replies

 
patiodog
 
  1  
Reply Mon 9 Feb, 2004 12:06 pm
So, what, suddenly somewhat at CNN is worried about substance? There are far more alarming errors of commission and omission during an hour on CNN than the repitition of the Dean scream. How much time is dedicated to the marital misadventures of Mr. Affleck and Ms. Lopez? Sheesh.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Mon 9 Feb, 2004 02:33 pm
Can someone tell me what "the scream" actually WAS?
0 Replies
 
patiodog
 
  1  
Reply Mon 9 Feb, 2004 04:09 pm
Dean listed states that he and his followers, reaching a crescendo as he moved on to Washington DC and the White House. Out of breath and out of words, but not having reached a satisfying climax (and apparently and understandably uncomfortable with the overblown assertion and aggression of the whole thing), he let out a sort of elided "Yee-haw!" That is, it sounded like, "Yah!" but with the attitude of a yee-haw. It was an enormously ill-conceived moment, more comic than anything else, but it certainly didn't exude dignity.

Of course, the Shrub fails to exude dignity just by showing up, but that's another story...
0 Replies
 
Craven de Kere
 
  1  
Reply Mon 9 Feb, 2004 04:27 pm
He said:

"Not only are we going to New Hampshire..., we're going to South Carolina and Oklahoma and Arizona and North Dakota and New Mexico, and we're going to California and Texas and New York! And we're going to South Dakota and Oregon and Washington and Michigan. And then we're going to Washington, D.C. to take back the White House, Yeeeeeaaaaaah!"


Here are "starwars kid-esque" remixes:

http://home.comcast.net/~cozdemir226/
0 Replies
 
Mr Stillwater
 
  1  
Reply Mon 9 Feb, 2004 06:05 pm
CNN has downgraded the danger posed from "Screams of Mass Destruction", to a "Funny-Noise-In-the-Back-of-the-Throat-Related-Whisper-Program".
0 Replies
 
Polski
 
  1  
Reply Mon 9 Feb, 2004 06:09 pm
The problem was not CNN, but Mr. Deans less than appealing actions.
I had always felt that GB would just hammer Mr. Dean in an election. I feel no remorse that Mr. Dean is fading away.
0 Replies
 
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Mon 9 Feb, 2004 06:52 pm
Millions of dollars and a lot of energy dissipated in an instant, as it were, by a crowd-shut-off microphone[/color] at the climactic cheer of a rally speech.

I know it wasn't that simple, but it comes to that.
0 Replies
 
revel
 
  1  
Reply Mon 9 Feb, 2004 08:05 pm
I saw the scream and I don't remember thinking it was a scream, but just a guy trying to rally his troops.

I never was that gung hoe about him being president but I am glad that he got the democratic party moving after being like blind sheep for so long. I remember when I first heard him talking about the war, I thought to myself, finally someone on TV is saying something I think. But after I started hearing how he balanced his budget, by cutting programs for the elderly and that he wanted to raise the age for retirement and things like that, I started to get a little worried and then that confederate flag comment cinched it for me. He might not have meant it in a racial way but nonetheless it showed a side that I didn't like.

But the news did make way too much of it just like they are now about Janet Jacksons breast of which we didn't even see since she had some kind of body jelwery covering more than a lot of bikinies do on the beach. I think she should have showed up at grammys in one of those backless dresses that only have little silky strips over their chest that a lot of actresses or famous people wear and not have apologized.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Feb, 2004 08:51 am
Craven de Kere wrote:
He said:

"Not only are we going to New Hampshire..., we're going to South Carolina and Oklahoma and Arizona and North Dakota and New Mexico, and we're going to California and Texas and New York! And we're going to South Dakota and Oregon and Washington and Michigan. And then we're going to Washington, D.C. to take back the White House, Yeeeeeaaaaaah!"


Here are "starwars kid-esque" remixes:

http://home.comcast.net/~cozdemir226/


Thanks craven.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Feb, 2004 08:52 am
Mr Stillwater wrote:
CNN has downgraded the danger posed from "Screams of Mass Destruction", to a "Funny-Noise-In-the-Back-of-the-Throat-Related-Whisper-Program".


That is very funny, Pondy.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Feb, 2004 09:15 am
Hmm - I listened to video - but I didn't hear a scream - just rather over the top political rah rah.

Hey - people get really excited in campaigns - it's intoxicating - over the top rah rah is common. I don't get it...
0 Replies
 
roger
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Feb, 2004 09:18 am
Political speeches are public events, with media invited. They came. I don't quite see the problem.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Feb, 2004 10:12 am
Well, this thread kinda sums it all up.

That it all should end this way ... how pathetically sad.
0 Replies
 
patiodog
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Feb, 2004 10:27 am
Quote:
Hey - people get really excited in campaigns - it's intoxicating - over the top rah rah is common.


Our politicoes aren't as entertaining as other countries'. It's really very dry and boring and predictable here.
0 Replies
 
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Feb, 2004 10:29 am
The crowd shutoff microphone enhanced his voice (for tv) relative to crowd noise, I gather.

Ugh.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Feb, 2004 10:44 am
patiodog wrote:
Quote:
Hey - people get really excited in campaigns - it's intoxicating - over the top rah rah is common.


Our politicoes aren't as entertaining as other countries'. It's really very dry and boring and predictable here.


Well that Dean speech was really wildly over the top to Dutch standards ...

But then Dutch standards are pretty mindnumbingly low-key. Any of GWB's speeches would seem bewilderingly out of place here, too - too much pathos, too much pomposity. Even Fortuyn was more playful than pompous - we dont look kindly on grandiosity in political speech here.
0 Replies
 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Feb, 2004 02:12 pm
nimh
nimh, even in Chruchill?

BBB
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Feb, 2004 02:42 pm
We don't look kindly on grandiosity in political speech here - for politicians in different countries, different standards ;-)
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Feb, 2004 03:08 pm
Hehehe.

But - Churchill wasn't Dutch. NIMH is.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » CNN Says It Overplayed Dean's Iowa Scream
Copyright © 2026 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 03/08/2026 at 12:24:36