Quote:Personally, I lay the blame for infidelity on club musicians who induce women into bodice loosening frenzies
So in this scenario, hobitbob, who is the seducer and who the seduced? I call for an interpretation.
Obviously, in our governmental structure with it's three branches, designed to provide checks and balances, there must be some body of government responsible for interpreting whether laws are constitutional or not. The Supremes have been in this business for a long time now. After all, they appointed the prez this last "election." Now that may not be legislation from the bench, but it sure was interpretation of something.........however, it wasn't interpretation of the Constitution. I'd be happy if the courts stuck to interpreting the Constitution and the law and laid off appointing Presidents. Oh no, now someone will come along and tell me to "get over it" that's old stuff. But I'll never forget.
In any case, we need checks and balances to protect ourselves from the despotism we're seeing enacted in the executive and legislative branches at the moment. It's not a perfect system, and I fear it could fail if this goes on much longer.
Obviously discrimination against homosexuals and lesbians is unfair and unconstitutional. We don't need the Mass. court to tell us that.