@Lash,
Lash wrote:
Everyone was quite happy to give opinions when there were no witness accounts - and to jump on the Bad Zimmerman bandwagon. I'm not surprised, but still really disappointed, to see no one even remark about the new information and their evolving views.Makes one think that there was never really interest in the FACTS, but how a sad case fed their political views.
I'm not sure that's actually true though I'm sure it IS true for some people, the same way that others had one opinion about this case that quickly changed when the right wing media started covering it, mostly from the angle of painting Trayvon as a gang-banger, drug dealer and amateur burglar. Gungasnake is a prime example but there are others. This case turned very political, which is a shame, because it blew up primarily because there was no arrest. And I still believe an arrest was justified.
Additionally, I think a lot of FACTS were available and some that you consider new are not really new. Some of the witness accounts were already reported (though second hand), including multiple accounts of Trayvon on top of Zimmerman right before he was shot. One of the 911 calls, in fact, describes this. True there was a lot of noise and hyperbole (and there still is) but many facts were available. The initial police report was published on Sanford's website. The 911 calls and Zimmerman's call to dispatch were released months ago. NBC edited that call to dispatch, but it had been available on the web unedited for weeks. (BTW, at least one Zimmerman lie is revealed in that call. He tells the dispatcher that he thinks Trayvon is "in his late teens" but in his bail hearing apology he said he didn't know how young he was and thought he was "a little younger" than himself. ) The information was there for those interested enough to look past the opinion pieces, or those who were interested in the case more than the secondary racial and political aspects of those who were protesting it.
Again, I'm not sure which people you are referring to, but if I'm one of them I would just point out that my views have not evolved and remain basically the same, and from what I can tell are probably pretty close to your own. You can search my posts on the subject, or take a look at my "Florida's Stand Your Ground Law" thread, before David came in and **** all over it. Doesn't mean I'm right, and doesn't mean I might not change my mind if some game changing evidence comes along. So far it just hasn't, IMO. I'm not a big fan of the mob mentality either, but if he had been arrested in the first place none of this would have happened.