@oristarA,
No. Well, Darwin's 'dangerous idea' was evolution. A design without a designer is like a creation without a Creator. Possibly, I should have said anti-religious concept.
"what something is for" is the same as its purpose. Now, something having a purpose is getting close to the idea that it was created. If it was created with a purpose, that kind of implies a creator, doesn't it?
By the way, I've never read Darwin. I'm just applying common concepts.