18
   

Reality from the view point of theists

 
 
izzythepush
 
  0  
Reply Sat 3 Mar, 2012 11:18 am
@reasoning logic,
reasoning logic wrote:
that to me is not only criticism but a form emotional retardation and it gets old.


Wouldn't a better description of emotional retardation be someone who cannot see when they're being offensive?

Don't get me wrong, I'm quite often offensive, but I know it.
reasoning logic
 
  0  
Reply Sat 3 Mar, 2012 11:19 am
@izzythepush,
I listened to what you had said and I took in what you said, are you now suggesting that if I do not lick balls I am not intellectual?
izzythepush
 
  0  
Reply Sat 3 Mar, 2012 11:26 am
@reasoning logic,
So we're back to ball licking again. You refused to accept my advice. You didn't take it in. What I said isn't some highbrow intellectualism, but something very basic, I would go as far as to say common sense even.

If you ask someone who is Jewish, if they have family members involved in organised crime, they're bound to be upset. The fact that you then pass it off by saying something equally offensive about Jews keeping themselves as a class apart from the rest of humanity, shows you have no understanding of basic human interraction.

Most people don't need to be told this. It's not rocket science.
0 Replies
 
reasoning logic
 
  1  
Reply Sat 3 Mar, 2012 11:26 am
@izzythepush,
Quote:
Wouldn't a better description of emotional retardation be someone who cannot see when they're being offensive?



Not exactly because we all are brought up in slightly different environments.

Quote:

Don't get me wrong, I'm quite often offensive, but I know it.


This is being antisocial and if you are doing it often then you seem to be defining sociopathy wouldn't you think?
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Sat 3 Mar, 2012 11:28 am
RL cannot handle criticism at all--and accusing the critic of "emotionalism" is his most common defense, attempting to imply that his critic is not motivated by "reasoning logic," but by an emotional response. Given that RL almost never seems to reason and does not even have a nodding acquaintance with logic, it's all pretty funny, but pathetic.
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Sat 3 Mar, 2012 11:31 am
@Setanta,
And now I'm a sociopath.
reasoning logic
 
  0  
Reply Sat 3 Mar, 2012 11:31 am
@Setanta,
Cant you two find other places to lick each others balls?
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Sat 3 Mar, 2012 11:32 am
@Setanta,
Setanta wrote:
Given that RL almost never seems to reason and does not even have a nodding acquaintance with logic, it's all pretty funny, but pathetic.


Like goldy or silvery, but iron.
0 Replies
 
reasoning logic
 
  0  
Reply Sat 3 Mar, 2012 11:33 am
@izzythepush,
Quote:
And now I'm a sociopath.


Only if you say so.

Quote:
I'm quite often offensive, but I know it.
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Sat 3 Mar, 2012 11:38 am
@reasoning logic,
Will you stop talking about balls. Setanta and I disagree about so much, we've thrown insults back and forth all the time, but your inability to understand, basic interraction, and a use of pat phrases like emotional, drunk, sociopath and psychopath, in order to deal with any form of critique is something that unites us. You're something of a consensus builder.

If you still want to lick balls why don't you ask the cryptkeeper? I'm sure he'd welcome it. It must be a long time since anyone's been near his raddled old saddlebags.

izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Sat 3 Mar, 2012 11:40 am
@reasoning logic,
reasoning logic wrote:

Quote:
And now I'm a sociopath.


Only if you say so.

Quote:
I'm quite often offensive, but I know it.



So that's your definition of sociopath, someone who can be offensive? You really are a ******* idiot.
reasoning logic
 
  0  
Reply Sat 3 Mar, 2012 11:43 am
@izzythepush,
Quote:
If you still want to lick balls why don't you ask the cryptkeeper? I'm sure he'd welcome it. It must be a long time since anyone's been near his raddled old saddlebags.


No thinks, If I ever want a ball licking I am going to someone I see doing it often because I want someone with lots of experience.
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  2  
Reply Sat 3 Mar, 2012 11:45 am
@reasoning logic,


Quote:
Do you know if there are vampires from other planets watching you and waiting to harvest you?


No I do not.


Quote:
I know it sounds stupid…


It does not sound stupid at all…and I understand the direction you are headed--the kinds of arguments you appear to want to make.

I’m going to take your comments seriously, RL…although some of my answers may suggest otherwise. I will try to explain the answers so that you see I am taking the concerns you have and your comments seriously.


Quote:
…. and I took it even a step further where logic should suggest that the probabilities are virtually nonexistent.



I have no idea about the “probabilities” other than my guess would be that you just made it up in order to try to make a point. But as for the probabilities of vampires existing on other planets or their interest in us…I cannot assign a degree of probability at present. Once again, however, my guess would be that the “vampires waiting to harvest me” is something YOU just invented for the purposes of making a point as yet unmade.


Quote:
Do you have any evidence for or against the vampires?


None, other than the way the concept entered this conversation…which leads me to guess that you just invented them for the purposes I mentioned above.
reasoning logic
 
  1  
Reply Sat 3 Mar, 2012 11:49 am
@izzythepush,
Quote:
So that's your definition of sociopath, someone who can be offensive? You really are a ******* idiot.


You do not like to be the definition? you do have to admit you do fill much of the criteria.

Hateful and gets off on it
does not seem to show empathy
does not have a guilty conscience of being hateful
likes to lick balls of other sociopaths

Do I need to list more?
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Sat 3 Mar, 2012 11:52 am
@reasoning logic,
No, but I'd been interested to see your source.
reasoning logic
 
  2  
Reply Sat 3 Mar, 2012 11:59 am
@Frank Apisa,
Quote:
None, other than the way the concept entered this conversation…which leads me to guess that you just invented them for the purposes I mentioned above.


The concept of vampires has been around for an extremely long time. I think that the difference between vampires and a god is that a god is acceptable if not almost demanded by society.
If the word God had not ever been mentioned until I brought it up, you may find it just as useful as the word vampire. What I am saying is if the word God was foreign to you, you may find the God concept just as valid as the vampire concept.
reasoning logic
 
  0  
Reply Sat 3 Mar, 2012 12:04 pm
@izzythepush,
Quote:
No, but I'd been interested to see your source.


You can look it up yourself, you have a computer. The only advise that I would give you is, do not look at it as if it is completely black and white because there is a lot more of us in the grey area.
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Sat 3 Mar, 2012 12:11 pm
@reasoning logic,
Quote:
The concept of vampires has been around for an extremely long time.


Okay! I agree. The concept of vampires has been around for an extremely long time.


Quote:
I think that the difference between vampires and a god is that a god is acceptable if not almost demanded by society.


Well, I think there are a lot more differences than that…and I do not think that particular difference is one of the more unique.


Quote:
If the word God had not ever been mentioned until I brought it up, you may find it just as useful as the word vampire.


Not really sure of what you are tying to say here, RL.


Quote:
What I am saying is if the word God was foreign to you, you may find the God concept just as valid as the vampire concept.

I am even more unsure of what you are trying to say here.

You are not being especially clear in what you are saying. And it seems obvious to me that you are trying to make a point that you have not truly explained yet. It may be that the “point” you are trying to make is an assertion. If so:

State the assertion; tell me why you want to make the assertion…and then give the basis for it.

Then we can discuss it.
izzythepush
 
  2  
Reply Sat 3 Mar, 2012 12:18 pm
@Frank Apisa,
Quote:
I am even more unsure of what you are trying to say here.


Don't worry, so's he.
0 Replies
 
reasoning logic
 
  1  
Reply Sat 3 Mar, 2012 12:23 pm
@Frank Apisa,
Quote:
Well, I think there are a lot more differences than that…and I do not think that particular difference is one of the more unique.


I think that the God concept is much more accepted as being possible than any other myth story I can make up, because your unconscious mind has been programed to accept it at a very young age.
 

Related Topics

New Propulsion, the "EM Drive" - Question by TomTomBinks
The Science Thread - Discussion by Wilso
Why do people deny evolution? - Question by JimmyJ
Are we alone in the universe? - Discussion by Jpsy
Fake Science Journals - Discussion by rosborne979
Controvertial "Proof" of Multiverse! - Discussion by littlek
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.1 seconds on 12/23/2024 at 10:10:07