0
   

What not use "mixed responses" but "mixed response"?

 
 
Reply Mon 30 Jan, 2012 02:01 am
Because a mixture contains a lot of responses.

Context:

Philosophy of science has historically been met with mixed response from the scientific community. Though scientists often contribute to the field, many prominent scientists have felt that the practical effect on their work is limited; a popular quote attributed to physicist Richard Feynman goes, “Philosophy of science is about as useful to scientists as ornithology is to birds.” In response, some philosophers (e.g. Jonathan Schaffer[1]) have pointed out that it is likely that ornithological knowledge would be of great benefit to birds, were it possible for them to possess it.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Question • Score: 0 • Views: 526 • Replies: 3
No top replies

 
PUNKEY
 
  2  
Reply Mon 30 Jan, 2012 08:57 am
Because "scientific community" is a collective noun.
IT gives a collective response.
0 Replies
 
Joe Nation
 
  1  
Reply Mon 30 Jan, 2012 08:58 am
@oristarA,
It's one of those English oddities.

My best guess is that the writer is referring to all of the replies as one whole thing. It is a fairly formal syntax "has .....been met with ... ."
You could settle it by adding an 'a'.

"..has historically been met with a mixed response.... ."

Joe(I thought the Feynman quote was funny. Did you?)Nation

0 Replies
 
oristarA
 
  1  
Reply Mon 30 Jan, 2012 09:37 am
Thank you both
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

deal - Question by WBYeats
Let pupils abandon spelling rules, says academic - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Please, I need help. - Question by imsak
Is this sentence grammatically correct? - Question by Sydney-Strock
"come from" - Question by mcook
concentrated - Question by WBYeats
 
  1. Forums
  2. » What not use "mixed responses" but "mixed response"?
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/07/2024 at 08:56:29