JTT
 
  1  
Mon 12 Nov, 2012 04:17 pm
@mysteryman,
Frank has within, more than enough inanities of his own, MM. He hardly needs your help there, though I must admit that you are a true fount in that regard.

Don't you think that it would be wiser to show that these things that the experts on US foreign policy describe as usual US behavior are all false, that the US actually is the beacon of hope that the propaganda says it is?

Don't you think you ought to try to use that hard won education of yours, MM, to shed light on the truth? Isn't there also something in the propaganda about 'truth, honor and ...'?


Quote:
and since he has only one song to sing, don't waste your time, unless you are prepared to agree with everything he says.


Debate must have been your major, MM?
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Mon 12 Nov, 2012 04:18 pm
@Frank Apisa,
The point is Frank, to be clear, is that it wasn't hyperbole by your argument, it wasn't hyperbole from a victim's argument and it wasn't hyperbole by JTT's argument. Neither was it "overcharged".

We all agree. It wasn't hyperbole assuming the deeds alleged happened which were, by the same logic, nothing worth writing home about. Especially for an evolutionist.
spendius
 
  1  
Mon 12 Nov, 2012 04:22 pm
@spendius,
Predation symbols are all over the place. And we have predation with something over and above teeth and claws. Intelligence. Technology.
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Mon 12 Nov, 2012 04:35 pm
@spendius,
Quote:
The point is Frank, to be clear, is that it wasn't hyperbole by your argument, it wasn't hyperbole from a victim's argument and it wasn't hyperbole by JTT's argument. Neither was it "overcharged".

We all agree. It wasn't hyperbole assuming the deeds alleged happened which were, by the same logic, nothing worth writing home about. Especially for an evolutionist.


I think you are very wrong here, Spendius. Reagan could be vicious...and still not be one of the most vicious people ever to walk the Earth.

I did not call the "vicious" accusation hyperbole...I called the "most vicious people ever to walk the Earth" hyperbole.

But if you are unable to agree with me...what can I say. I am enjoying this conversation for a number of reasons...and the justifications for the disagreements with me are some of the most enjoyable.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Mon 12 Nov, 2012 04:37 pm
@Frank Apisa,
Reagan had such a good smile too! Twisted Evil Twisted Evil Twisted Evil Twisted Evil
0 Replies
 
georgeob1
 
  -1  
Mon 12 Nov, 2012 04:43 pm
@spendius,
spendius wrote:

Quote:
Odd that your expressed willingness to ascribe an Obama defeat to white racism doesn't suggest to you the contrary in the case of the Obama victory. Does an even greater statistical proclivity of Black voters to prefer Obama suggest the existence of racism on the part of Blacks in this country?


There is a problem with that George. It is that most of the black people are in a low economic demographic along with a fair number of white people and the coalition voted for Mr Obama for economic reasons and not necessarily for race reasons.

If over 90% of black people are in the bottom 50% economically and Mr Obama, roughly, represents that section of the population and the votes divide along that demarcation, give or take a bit of diffusion, then it is obvious the black people in the coalition will vote for Mr Obama. As it presumably did for Mr Clinton.
Nonsense. You are merely suggesting that both groups on average voted according to their economic status, thus discounting the supposed racism altogether. I was pointing out the obvious inconsistency of Thomas' logic with respect to his willingness to assume white Racism, but deny it on the part of Blacks. It doesn't take much time here to learn that such feelings exist in roughly equal numbers among both groups. Snood repeatledly illustrated this. You shouldn't be surprised by this: human nature is generally the same everywhere, -- even among Brits.

In addition you are incorrect about the economic distribution of Blacks here . A lot fewer that 90% of Blacks in this country are in the economic "bottom" of the distribution.
mysteryman
 
  0  
Mon 12 Nov, 2012 05:19 pm
@Frank Apisa,
Hyperbole from jtt?
This is the same person that has accused EVERY US president in history of being a war criminal.
He has called EVERY current and former member of the US military a war criminal.

He is nothing but hyperbole and exaggeration.
Thomas
 
  3  
Mon 12 Nov, 2012 05:19 pm
@georgeob1,
georgeob1 wrote:
I was pointing out the obvious inconsistency of Thomas' logic with respect to his willingness to assume white Racism, but deny it on the part of Blacks.

Where have I denied Black racism? I may have ignored it, sure, but I never denied it. (Not even Snood has denied it.)

And why not ignore it? We haven't seen any Black wingnuts demanding Romney's birth certificate, or asserted that he really is a Nazi born in Austria, or that he's a Muslim. If such voices exist unbeknownst to me, they certainly haven't been enabled by prominent Democrats as the Truthers have been enabled by Republicans. Finally, on top of all that, there are much fewer Blacks than Whites in the US generally, and in swing states particularly. All of this makes it that much harder for Black racists to swing elections, and that much safer to ignore the influence of Black racists on the election's outcome. So, yeah, I ignored it. Sue me.

As much as you may crave symmetry between Black and White racists, it's just not there as far as the election is concerned.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Mon 12 Nov, 2012 05:41 pm
@Thomas,
True, whites vs blacks in the US isn't even close.

From Wiki.
Quote:
Total Population 308,745,538 100.0% 281,421,906 100.0%
Single race
White 196,817,552 63.7 211,460,626 75.1
Black or African American 37,685,848 12.2 34,658,190 12.3
American Indian and Alaska Native 2,247,098 .7 2,475,956 0.9
Asian 14,465,124 4.7 10,242,998 3.6
Native Hawaiian and other Pacific Islander 481,576 0.15 398,835 0.1
Two or more races 5,966,481 1.9 6,826,228 2.4
Some other race 604,265
.2
15,359,073 5.5
Hispanic or Latino 50,477,594 16.3 35,305,818 12.5


Read more: Population of the United States by Race and Hispanic/Latino Origin, Census 2000 and July 1, 2005 — Infoplease.com http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0762156.html#ixzz2C3VWxX8b
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  1  
Mon 12 Nov, 2012 05:48 pm
@Frank Apisa,
Quote:
I am enjoying this conversation for a number of reasons


The primary reason being that you don't have to face uncomfortable truths, Frank. That's been your intention from the get go, as it is with so much of what you discuss.

I have never seen anyone able to so studiously ignore the facts placed right in front of your nose, except for maybe, MM or Setanta or Gob or ... .
spendius
 
  2  
Mon 12 Nov, 2012 05:54 pm
@georgeob1,
Quote:
You are merely suggesting that both groups on average voted according to their economic status, thus discounting the supposed racism altogether.


If you had read my post more carefully George I think you would have found that I did not discount racism altogether. I don't think I have discounted any possibility "altogether" since I was on the tit.

I would never dream of discounting supposed racism.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Mon 12 Nov, 2012 05:58 pm
@georgeob1,
BTW George. My use of the word "roughly" is a joke Mr Veblen taught me how to do. It is more than one word. It is a universe of mirth.
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  -1  
Mon 12 Nov, 2012 06:04 pm
@Frank Apisa,
Quote:
I think you are very wrong here, Spendius. Reagan could be vicious...and still not be one of the most vicious people ever to walk the Earth.

I did not call the "vicious" accusation hyperbole...I called the "most vicious people ever to walk the Earth" hyperbole.


That's another thing I noticed in the discussion on language. You can't even keep what was said and what you have said straight, Frank.

Was it that large margin that led Reagan to become one of the most vicious of war criminals/terrorists to ever walk the planet, MM?

You think Spendi is wrong and yet you postulate an argument from a position of deep ignorance. Just as you did in the language discussion. How can you expect to actually discuss anything in a sensible fashion when you so readily avoid the facts?
Frank Apisa
 
  2  
Mon 12 Nov, 2012 06:31 pm
@mysteryman,
Quote:
Hyperbole from jtt?
This is the same person that has accused EVERY US president in history of being a war criminal.
He has called EVERY current and former member of the US military a war criminal.

He is nothing but hyperbole and exaggeration.


Well...calling him nothing but hyperbole and exaggeration probably is hyperbole itself, but I get your meaning. He certainly indulges in hyperbole and exaggeration often...and in many, many of his posts. (Unless JTT is a woman, in which case I would use the feminine pronouns.)
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Mon 12 Nov, 2012 06:32 pm
Over thirty thousand signatures have been sent by petition to have Texas declared an independent nation, since the election. I guess they didn't hear Lincoln's answer to that the first time.
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Mon 12 Nov, 2012 06:35 pm
@JTT,
Quote:
The primary reason being that you don't have to face uncomfortable truths, Frank. That's been your intention from the get go, as it is with so much of what you discuss.


I have no problem facing "uncomfortable truths", JTT. Not sure where you get that idea...although I do notice you have a very fertile imagination.

Quote:
I have never seen anyone able to so studiously ignore the facts placed right in front of your nose, except for maybe, MM or Setanta or Gob or ... .


Actually, JTT, that was very funny...although to my ear, there were some grammatical inconsistencies (anyone/your)...although I know you will suggest that is only the prescriptionist in me at work.

Question, did you put that in there to test whether or not I would mention it?
JTT
 
  1  
Mon 12 Nov, 2012 06:37 pm
@Frank Apisa,
Quote:
He certainly indulges in hyperbole and exaggeration often...and in many, many of his posts.


Neither of you will ever know because you both are satisfied to remain ignorant on these issues, Frank.

I twice gave MM the opportunity, actually starting threads for him, because he wanted to discuss the good the USA has done. He never showed up, nor did anyone else.

You both are just hopelessly devoted to inanities.
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Mon 12 Nov, 2012 06:38 pm
@JTT,
Quote:
Re: Frank Apisa (Post 5165623)
Quote:
I think you are very wrong here, Spendius. Reagan could be vicious...and still not be one of the most vicious people ever to walk the Earth.

I did not call the "vicious" accusation hyperbole...I called the "most vicious people ever to walk the Earth" hyperbole.


That's another thing I noticed in the discussion on language. You can't even keep what was said and what you have said straight, Frank.

Was it that large margin that led Reagan to become one of the most vicious of war criminals/terrorists to ever walk the planet, MM?

You think Spendi is wrong and yet you postulate an argument from a position of deep ignorance. Just as you did in the language discussion. How can you expect to actually discuss anything in a sensible fashion when you so readily avoid the facts?


Not really sure what in hell you are talking about here, JTT...you are not an especially clear writer. (I apologize if English is a second language with you.)

I did not write the comment you italicized...Spendius did.
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Mon 12 Nov, 2012 06:39 pm
@edgarblythe,
Quote:
Over thirty thousand signatures have been sent by petition to have Texas declared an independent nation, since the election. I guess they didn't hear Lincoln's answer to that the first time.


Where is the petition. I'd like to sign it. Smile

(Just joking, Edgar...I know you are from that great state!)
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Mon 12 Nov, 2012 06:41 pm
@JTT,
Quote:
Neither of you will ever know because you both are satisfied to remain ignorant on these issues, Frank.


I am not satisfied to remain ignorant on these issues, JTT. Whatever gives you these strange ideas?

Quote:
I twice gave MM the opportunity, actually starting threads for him, because he wanted to discuss the good the USA has done. He never showed up, nor did anyone else.


I wonder why people don't like to talk with you. You are very entertaining.

Quote:
You both are just hopelessly devoted to inanities.


Ya think?
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
So....Will Biden Be VP? - Question by blueveinedthrobber
My view on Obama - Discussion by McGentrix
Obama/ Love Him or Hate Him, We've Got Him - Discussion by Phoenix32890
Obama fumbles at Faith Forum - Discussion by slkshock7
Expert: Obama is not the antichrist - Discussion by joefromchicago
Obama's State of the Union - Discussion by maxdancona
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Obama 2012?
  3. » Page 42
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.11 seconds on 11/17/2024 at 05:49:27