14
   

Countdown to the end of Obama's presidency.

 
 
H2O MAN
 
  -3  
Reply Tue 31 Jan, 2012 07:21 am
@farmerman,


I see that you rectal cranial inversion has not been cured...
the US constitution does not grant anyone the right to vote in a presidential election.

Now be a good little liberal and take your dumb ass home.
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Tue 31 Jan, 2012 07:26 am
@H2O MAN,
Thats plagiarism. I used "Anal cranial inversion first". It sounds more poetic .

Liberal and proud.
Conservative on a few things.

What happens when yer boy Newlin gets his ass handed to him today?
H2O MAN
 
  -3  
Reply Tue 31 Jan, 2012 07:28 am
@farmerman,

Laughing Formerman, you are A2Ks poster child for the dumbmasses - you are an ignoranus.

Where will you hide when your precious president Obama leaves office this coming January?
revelette
 
  1  
Reply Tue 31 Jan, 2012 07:30 am
@H2O MAN,
Quote:
Nineteenth Amendment
Passed by Congress June 4, 1919.
Ratified August 18, 1920.

Section 1: The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.

Section 2: Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.


source

Quote:
U.S. Constitution: Twenty-Sixth Amendment
Section 1. The right of citizens of the United States, who are eighteen years of age or older, to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of age.

Section 2. The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.

source

Quote:
U.S. Constitution: Fifteenth Amendment
Section. 1. The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude.

Section. 2. The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.


source

farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Tue 31 Jan, 2012 07:32 am
@H2O MAN,
alas we are all ignoramii on different things. However,I dont think I d have any problem getting to your level,conversely I think that you would have diffculty reaching mine.
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Tue 31 Jan, 2012 07:34 am
@farmerman,
I think Ive fed the parakeet enough this fine morning. Somebody else is gonna have to change the papers in his cage.
H2O MAN
 
  -3  
Reply Tue 31 Jan, 2012 07:37 am
@farmerman,
You just keep coming back for more...
0 Replies
 
H2O MAN
 
  -3  
Reply Tue 31 Jan, 2012 07:39 am
@revelette,

Sorry, there is nothing in the US constitution that grants citizens the right to vote in a presidential election.

Quote:
Amidst the divisiveness of the United States Supreme Court's second foray into the 2000 Presidential election, it is easy to overlook the significance of the Court's earlier, unanimous ruling of December 4, 2000. A close reading of the decision in that case, Bush v. Palm Beach County Canvassing Board, reveals a clear consensus for what will strike many Americans as an outrageous proposition: there is no constitutional right to vote in a Presidential election. The fact that the state in which you reside even permits you to vote for electors is purely a matter of legislative grace.
revelette
 
  1  
Reply Tue 31 Jan, 2012 07:52 am
@H2O MAN,
Not all court decisions are rational.

Apparently they have the illogical reasoning that as long as the states don't single out people based on their race or gender and other things covered on those amendments they can deny whole sections of people the right to vote. That needs to be changed.
H2O MAN
 
  -3  
Reply Tue 31 Jan, 2012 07:53 am
@revelette,


But the truth is that we have no constitutional right to vote for President — or even for Presidential electors.
parados
 
  1  
Reply Tue 31 Jan, 2012 08:06 am
@H2O MAN,
H2O MAN wrote:



Why let people vote if they can't recognize a despot?

That has to be the funniest thing you have ever said Spurt.

People can't vote out a despot. Your call to vote him out proves he isn't a despot.
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  2  
Reply Tue 31 Jan, 2012 08:09 am
@H2O MAN,
I posted this previously and you ignored it Spurt..
Quote:
Amendment 24

1. The right of citizens of the United States to vote in any primary or other election for President or Vice President, for electors for President or Vice President, or for Senator or Representative in Congress, shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or any State by reason of failure to pay any poll tax or other tax.

Citizens have a right that to vote for the election of President and Vice President that can't be denied or abridged.
revelette
 
  1  
Reply Tue 31 Jan, 2012 08:14 am
@parados,
Not to side with you know who and I think that was a stupid decision by that Supreme Court. However, they say as long as the reason a state is denying someone the right to vote is not because of race or gender or failure to pay taxes, then that state can deny someone the right to vote. Its outrageous.
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  2  
Reply Tue 31 Jan, 2012 08:15 am
@H2O MAN,
That is sort of a narrow view of what the USSC decision in Bush actually was about. The selection of electors was being decided from a USSC "primacy decision" in which from an 1891 case said that electors can be chosen from a "geographical area" not necessarily a state.
The Constitution clearly states the process of elections and reafirms the right to vote(State Constitutions also reaffirm the rights of their citizens to include voting) .(Look at all the civil rights and womens suffrage issues contained in the amendments)
H2O MAN
 
  -3  
Reply Tue 31 Jan, 2012 08:15 am
@parados,
Parasite, your information is incorrect.
H2O MAN
 
  -3  
Reply Tue 31 Jan, 2012 08:16 am
@farmerman,


Bottom line: we have no constitutional right to vote for President — or even for Presidential electors.
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  3  
Reply Tue 31 Jan, 2012 08:20 am
@H2O MAN,
If you would debate issues like an adult, people would pay attention to you. Im not sure I want to continue with you since you are being a petulant little child
H2O MAN
 
  -3  
Reply Tue 31 Jan, 2012 08:22 am
@farmerman,


Why would I debate with a child such as yourself when the facts that I have presented are incontrovertible?
0 Replies
 
H2O MAN
 
  -3  
Reply Tue 31 Jan, 2012 08:42 am


Debbie Wasserman Shultz:
Obama - Not Up To The Job
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  1  
Reply Tue 31 Jan, 2012 08:56 am
@H2O MAN,
H2O MAN wrote:

Parasite, your information is incorrect.

The US Constitution is incorrect?
http://www.usconstitution.net/const.html

Anyone is free to read the US Constitution at my link. Feel free to post your version of the US Constitution that doesn't include the 24th amendment Spurt.
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
GAFFNEY: Whose side is Obama on? - Discussion by gungasnake
 
Copyright © 2022 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.09 seconds on 01/18/2022 at 07:50:15