Below viewing threshold (view)
Below viewing threshold (view)
Below viewing threshold (view)
MontereyJack
 
  5  
Reply Thu 2 Feb, 2012 05:19 pm
Hmm. One million people voting to defeat Obama in 2012, eh? 65 million people voting to re-elect him. Guess who wins?
Below viewing threshold (view)
MontereyJack
 
  5  
Reply Thu 2 Feb, 2012 11:22 pm
It's your post, H2, that has the lousy math. Can't blame me that you folks are unable to do simple math comparisons.
0 Replies
 
Below viewing threshold (view)
Gargamel
 
  4  
Reply Fri 3 Feb, 2012 09:42 am
@H2O MAN,
Throw in some bestiality porn and that screenshot becomes a fairly accurate representation of H2O Man's "mind," albeit with correct spelling.
H2O MAN
 
  -4  
Reply Fri 3 Feb, 2012 04:06 pm
@Gargamel,


Whatever trips your trigger boy, just stay away from the children.
0 Replies
 
H2O MAN
 
  -3  
Reply Tue 7 Feb, 2012 02:04 pm


Fisker announces layoffs as automaker misses targets, has DOE loans frozen
0 Replies
 
H2O MAN
 
  -4  
Reply Tue 7 Feb, 2012 04:48 pm

0 Replies
 
H2O MAN
 
  -2  
Reply Wed 8 Feb, 2012 08:51 am



Obamamedia hypocrisy on jobs figures
parados
 
  4  
Reply Wed 8 Feb, 2012 08:57 am
@H2O MAN,
That's funny stuff Spurt. The quotes nowhere mention that a million people dropped out of the workforce even thought that is what Boortz claimed.

Can you actualy think or comprehend anything?
H2O MAN
 
  -3  
Reply Wed 8 Feb, 2012 08:59 am
@parados,


Parasite, I'm sorry that you have such a tough time reading and understanding things...
isn't there a program or support group that caters to people suffering with liberaltardation?
0 Replies
 
H2O MAN
 
  -3  
Reply Wed 8 Feb, 2012 11:03 am

The business of America is business and it's unfortunate for America that
Barack Hussein Obama has zero experience running any sort of business.
Gargamel
 
  4  
Reply Wed 8 Feb, 2012 12:46 pm
@H2O MAN,
Let's deconstruct this bullshit.

"The business of America is business."

Ostensibly the two usages of "business" in this clause are distinct; otherwise you would simply be offering a circuitous definition of the term. Even by your standards that would be dumb as ****. Since the second instance of "business" in that first clause lends itself strictly to "business" as in "enterprise," as opposed to "business" as in "concern" (e.g. "It's none of your business"), we can safely assume that you are saying that the concern of America is business. America has many concerns, however; we presume you mean that business is America's operative concern.

What are we to make of such an assertion? How can we make anything of it? What kind of business? Weapons manufacturing? Water softener repair? Who was the last President with extensive business experience? Or were you simply using repetition as a lyrical device, a la Faulkner, in an attempt to sound smart?

"It's unfortunate for America that Barack Hussein Obama has zero experience running any sort of business."

Although stupid, this clause at least tries to impart something resembling insight. But implicit in the clause is the assumption that running a private enterprise, say motherfucking Burger King (Herman Cain--hahahahahaha!), in which the objective of the executives is to profit from selling fat, provides the experience necessary to running America, experience that can not be obtained serving as, I don't know, a U.S. Senator.

Even you will agree, H2O man, that this is nonsense. In fact, since the objective of the President is to serve the people of the U.S., not to maximize profit, the reverse of your statement is true. It's incredibly fortunate for America that the President has zero experience running any sort of business.

Finally, we must question your intent. Are you really so stupid as to believe your post, or are you just an asshole?

The world may never know.
H2O MAN
 
  -2  
Reply Wed 8 Feb, 2012 01:33 pm
@Gargamel,


Gargoyle, you just strengthened both claims for me...
your feeble effort at deconstruction has failed miserably .
0 Replies
 
H2O MAN
 
  -2  
Reply Thu 9 Feb, 2012 08:04 am


Dependence at an all-time high
0 Replies
 
H2O MAN
 
  -2  
Reply Sun 12 Feb, 2012 02:32 am
Obama is anti gun.




By Neal Boortz

Are you concerned about the federal government chipping away at your rights?
Are you particularly worried about the Second Amendment and your right to keep and bear arms?

Then you could be classified as a “militia extremist” according to our imperial federal government and Janet “the system worked” Napolitano.

Here’s the Department of Homeland Security report from Pajamas Media

A recently published “lexicon” distributed to thousands of federal, state, and local law enforcement agencies by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) targets citizens concerned about their Second Amendment rights and the steady encroachment of the federal government, categorizing such as “militia extremists.”

Its definition of “militia extremists” states:

(U//FOUO) Groups or individuals who facilitate or engage in acts of violence directed at federal, state, or local government officials or infrastructure in response to their belief that the government deliberately is stripping Americans of their freedoms and is attempting to establish a totalitarian regime. These individuals consequently oppose many federal and state authorities’ laws and regulations, (particularly those related to firearms ownership), and often belong to armed paramilitary groups. They often conduct paramilitary training designed to violently resist perceived government oppression or to violently overthrow the US Government.

Just another goodie brought to you by the Obama administration … the same Obama administration, which compares terrorism to “ordinary crime” in the U.S. and omits the radical Islamic factor, instead finding “significant variability in the ideologies motivating terrorist attacks across decades.” Riiiight.
0 Replies
 
H2O MAN
 
  -1  
Reply Sun 12 Feb, 2012 02:40 am

And who could forget...

http://api.ning.com/files/ifXSEHw7O0nLljzfSy*IOYlOXicnp5AnxaBZmyayhbckeGe8JmYfB5W1k2DYLJFIhqIcM*-6ufdPYmYgEqge-lRAU4jCVih9/barneyquits.jpg
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2021 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/12/2021 at 03:18:40