0
   

take the lion head on = subdue the lion?

 
 
Reply Sat 19 Nov, 2011 07:41 pm

Context:

By 199 AD, Sun Ce had taken the district of Lujiang from Liu Xun, and accepted a surrender of Yuzhang from Hua Xin. After sending Zhang Hong to the capital, Xuchang, to detail his victories to the court, Cao Cao sighed, saying, "We cannot take the lion head on." Cao Cao arranged for his the daughter of his cousin to marry Sun Ce's youngest brother, Sun Kuang, to bind the two houses and ensure safety. Sun Ce requested the post of Grand Marshal, which would give him status comparable to Cao Cao, but Cao Cao refused. Sun Ce began resenting him and planned an attack on the capital.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Question • Score: 0 • Views: 532 • Replies: 3
No top replies

 
Rockhead
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Nov, 2011 07:47 pm
@oristarA,
engage the lion would be better...
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Nov, 2011 08:59 pm
@oristarA,
Quote:
take the lion head on = subdue the lion?
It means to attack, or to address the situation, DIRECTLY, at its strong point,
as distinct from indirect flank attacks.





David
0 Replies
 
oristarA
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Nov, 2011 09:04 pm
Thank you both.

I think "take head on" is a phrase? What has confused me might be that I mistook "lion head" for "lion's head."
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

deal - Question by WBYeats
Let pupils abandon spelling rules, says academic - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Please, I need help. - Question by imsak
Is this sentence grammatically correct? - Question by Sydney-Strock
"come from" - Question by mcook
concentrated - Question by WBYeats
 
  1. Forums
  2. » take the lion head on = subdue the lion?
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 10/06/2024 at 07:28:05