in these conditions =? go to the community = ?

I understand Ereditato as adopting a paradigmatic position (Thomas Kuhn "The Structure of Scientific Revolutions) in which the "scientific community" is the final arbiter (not lay speculators) of whether an anomalous result can be encompassed in the existing paradigm, or whether it is sufficiently problematic to shift the paradigm. This situation of tension =these conditions.

Okay. Without getting you to read Kuhn I will summarize his position that what we call "science" is not some "body of knowledge" independent of its users. "Science" is "what scientists do" - it is the complex web of communicative interaction which defines "valid scientific work" from period to period. Any period of relative stability in this evolving definition process can be called "a paradigm" and involves agreement about "standard models".At this time, one of the foundation axioms of "the relativity model" is being questioned.Thus the current paradigmatic position may be untenable.