0
   

Palestinian Solidarity Campaign disrupts Israeli Concert. Yeah!!!

 
 
izzythepush
 
  2  
Reply Wed 21 Sep, 2011 11:46 am
@Finn dAbuzz,
Hamas are no more a bunch of fanatical murderers than the IRA were. They have attracted a substantial share of the vote, due to the fact that Fatah have given away so much for absolutely nothing. You can't choose who you have to sit down with it's called realpolitik. Hamas are quite capable of calling a ceasefire, and if there is real peace then rhetoric about the destrucrtion of Israel will become meaningless.

The constant oppression of the Palestinians, not the rhetorical stance of Hamas is the real obstacle to peace.
Finn dAbuzz
 
  1  
Reply Wed 21 Sep, 2011 12:13 pm
@izzythepush,
The IRA were a bunch of fanatical murderers too, but I would be interested in your reasoning for arguing that neither they nor Hamas fit the bill.

Also, how have you reached the conclusion that Hamas is "quite capable of calling (and more importantly, honoring) a ceasefire?"

Israel may not get to choose who represents Palestinians, but they certainly can choose whether or not they will negotiate with them.

Are you a fan of realpolitik only when it might benefit the Palestinians or are you equally accepting of it when the governments of both our nations employ it to deal with foreign dictators?

Do you really believe that the only hindrance to peace that might be attributable to Hamas is their "rhetorical stance?"
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Wed 21 Sep, 2011 12:15 pm
@izzythepush,
Quote:
Hamas are no more a bunch of fanatical murderers than the IRA were.


Or the CIA. Why does everyone always forget the CIA? Hamas isn't responsible for/complicit in the deaths of some 6 million people.
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Wed 21 Sep, 2011 12:18 pm
@Finn dAbuzz,
Hamas has maintained ceasefires in the past. There is a world of difference between a murderer who kills for pleasure, money etc and someone who kills because of their political stance. If that was not the case we would not have been able to start the peace process. Israel may not want to deal with Hamas, but that's a darn sight better than having to deal with Islamic Jihad.
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Wed 21 Sep, 2011 12:29 pm
@Finn dAbuzz,
Quote:
The IRA were a bunch of fanatical murderers too


Then why haven't you been at the forefront, Finn, demanding that all those Americans who sent money and arms to the IRA aren't brought to account for their actions?
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  1  
Reply Wed 21 Sep, 2011 01:45 pm
@izzythepush,
izzythepush wrote:

There is a world of difference between a murderer who kills for pleasure, money etc and someone who kills because of their political stance.


Really?

izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Wed 21 Sep, 2011 02:11 pm
@Finn dAbuzz,
Yes, in terms of rehabilitation especially. Do you think I'm happy about IRA bombers being let out? I'm not, but I know it's something that had to be done.
oralloy
 
  -1  
Reply Wed 21 Sep, 2011 06:31 pm
@izzythepush,
izzythepush wrote:
Hamas are no more a bunch of fanatical murderers than the IRA were. They have attracted a substantial share of the vote, due to the fact that Fatah have given away so much for absolutely nothing.


Nonsense. Fatah gained plenty for their compromise. They gained control over the 50% of the West Bank that Palestinians reside on.

And had they not sabotaged negotiations by murdering Israeli children, they would have gained the 1967 borders they yearn for.



izzythepush wrote:
The constant oppression of the Palestinians, not the rhetorical stance of Hamas is the real obstacle to peace.


As if it were "oppression" to tell Palestinians not to go around murdering people.

Laughing Laughing Laughing
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  2  
Reply Fri 23 Sep, 2011 11:45 am
@izzythepush,
Interesting article in the Guardian today. It looks like Netanyahu is going against the majority opinion in his country.

Quote:
It is the exact spot where the new sovereign state was declared. But the year was 1948 and the state was Israel.

Now new officers in the Israeli army are brought to Independence Hall on Rothschild Boulevard in Tel Aviv as part of their education in the history of the Jewish state.

On the day before Mahmoud Abbas was expected to launch his bid for a Palestinian state, guide Amir Rimon 28, was lecturing a group of young soldiers under one of Rothschild's broad ficus trees.

"We come [here] to remind ourselves of the values on which our state was founded," he said. The Declaration of Independence, read by David Ben-Gurion 63 years ago, said Palestinians would be equals in the fledgling country.

"I think we need to recognise a Palestinian state. Many of the soldiers agree with me – it's 50-50," Rimon added. A recent poll conducted by the Hebrew University found that 70% of Israelis believe that if the UN votes in favour of a Palestinian state, Israel should accept the decision. This is not the position of the Israeli government.

Prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu insists there can be no peace if the Palestinians follow a unilateral path at the UN. On Wednesday, President Obama threw his weight behind this position.

But on Rothschild Boulevard, alternative Israeli voices are being raised. More than 80 prominent Israeli intellectuals gathered outside Independence Hall on Thursday. They were led by author Sefi Rachlevski, to declare their support for a Palestinian state along the 1967 borders.

"We will have an affect because we represent the real Jewish Zionist heritage and what we're saying is obvious: Palestine, you don't need our permission to have a state. Negotiations on its borders can follow," said Rachlevski.

Israeli historian Yehuda Bauer was among signatories to the declaration. He argued that the establishment of two independent neighbouring states was the only solution, and that it is an outcome that would be supported by the majority of Israelis.

But he warned it would be met with an armed rebellion by the rightwing, nationalist orthodox minority: "The fear I have of is not so much that hundreds of thousands of Palestinians will march to the 1967 borders. I am afraid of the violent orthodox who have openly established a separate entity [in settlements in the occupied Palestinian territory]. They pose the real danger to Israel."

As the intellectuals launched their protest at Independence Hall, at the opposite end of Rothschild, a few dozen tents and a thriving herb garden were all that remained of Israel's summer of demos. This was the hub of a nationwide call for change that rallied thousands of Israelis.

Palestinian activists note that this unprecedented protest conspicuously ignored the occupation. It proved too divisive an issue for organisers to press upon.

Protest leader Dror Shalom, 35, insisted criticism of the occupation was implicit in their challenge to Netanyahu's rightwing government. The majority of people who protested in Tel Aviv and Jerusalem, he said, would extend their calls for justice to Palestinians.

Shalom said: "Palestine is a country and it has been for years. We know where the Palestinian state will be, which is where it is now. We will have to evacuate a few thousand Israelis and that's it."

Shalom believed the majority of Israelis accept a Palestinian state is inevitable, whether it is declared unilaterally or reached through negotiations. Like Bauer, he identified the obstacle as Israel's powerful, nationalist religious lobby and its disproportionate influence over Netanyahu's rightwing government.

He added: "We love Israel and are worried about the direction it is headed. It was our intention at the last big protest to revise Israel's Declaration of Independence."

• This article was amended on 23 September 2011 to correct a mistake in the fifth paragraph - we had attributed a quote to Abbas which was incorrect. The words were spoken by Rimon, the tour guide.



Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Fri 23 Sep, 2011 11:50 am
@izzythepush,
How very embarrassing!
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Fri 23 Sep, 2011 12:00 pm
@Setanta,
There was a guy being interviewed on the BBC earlier, (sorry I didn't catch his name,) but he said there was a (at the moment distant) prospect of Civil War. The majority of Israelis are sick of the religious minority, and what really grates is that the settlers are excused military service, but expect their illegal settlements to be protected by those who aren't excused.
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Fri 23 Sep, 2011 12:05 pm
@izzythepush,
This is one of the products of a Westminster style government (which is not a slam at your Parliament). Because no one party in Israel is able to form a majority government, nor form a coalition with another major party, they rely on coalition with the small, fanatical religious parties, which haven't a hope in hell of ever forming a government.
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Fri 23 Sep, 2011 12:44 pm
@Setanta,
Actually, Israel has a unicameral parliament and a proportional election system ... which isn't really "Westminster style" but more the "consensus style".
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Fri 23 Sep, 2011 12:53 pm
@Walter Hinteler,
Yes, that's true, but it is still bedeviled by the necessity for coalition government.
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Fri 23 Sep, 2011 01:07 pm
@Setanta,
Yeah I think Walt's got a point with PR. We don't have PR, and this is the first postwar coalition we've ever had. It's the electoral, not the parliamentary system that gives the small parties disproportionate influence. We just threw out AV in a referendum, so it's not happening over here.
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Fri 23 Sep, 2011 01:09 pm
@izzythepush,
Well, that and the fact that no government can be formed in Israel without first obtaining a vote of confidence from the Knesset.
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  1  
Reply Fri 23 Sep, 2011 01:33 pm
@izzythepush,
A majority of Americans opposed Obamacare but it became the law anyway. On Nov 2, 2010, this majority opinion was expressed through an election shellacking for the Democrats and the Republicans taking over the House. On Nov 2, 2012 it will result in the Democrats losing the White House and the Senate. If the majority of Israelis want their country to recognize a Palestinian state, they can arrange for it through elections.

JTT
 
  0  
Reply Fri 23 Sep, 2011 02:09 pm
@Finn dAbuzz,
Quote:
"I am not a crook" Richard Nixon, 1973


He was a major crook, a felon, a 1st class war criminal, a terrorist of gigantic proportion, and of course he was a liar without equal.

If only ole sneaky Dick was still around, he would make a great Repub candidate, wouldn't he, Finn?
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  0  
Reply Fri 23 Sep, 2011 02:18 pm
@Finn dAbuzz,
Quote:
A majority of Americans opposed Obamacare but it became the law anyway.


I wonder, is this another example of your great tendency to mendacity, Finn?
0 Replies
 
Yahoojack
 
  -1  
Reply Fri 2 Mar, 2012 08:46 am
@izzythepush,
Tell us all exactly what this accomplished, besides proving your group is a bunch of animals who have no respect for culture.You don't give a damn about the rights of people who came to listen to music.What ya did is make enemies.
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.08 seconds on 11/23/2024 at 03:19:34