0
   

Palestinian Solidarity Campaign disrupts Israeli Concert. Yeah!!!

 
 
Foofie
 
  3  
Reply Sat 17 Sep, 2011 03:23 pm
@gungasnake,
gungasnake wrote:

Quote:
1) I am also trying to do preventive measures, so another generation of decent Gentiles do not have to question what type of humanity they belong to, if there is a second Holocaust....


There is no further threat of holocausts coming from Christians; a second holocaust would be the work of slammites and shit4brains libtards like POOP and Hinkey here who either are slammites, are married to slammites, or are operating under some delusion that slammites might come for them last.



Considering the western world is really so militarily strong, and if some Moslem nation though it was good to eliminate Israel via a nuclear weapon, then the fact that the west might not do anything to PREVENT IT, could be thought of as "TACIT APPROVAL," by more than one historian in hindsight. So, regardless of the lack of overt, Nazi style western anti-Semitism, there could be an inability for western Gentiles to really value Jewish life, before a second Holocaust. It is easy to show remorse, after an atrocity.
0 Replies
 
Foofie
 
  3  
Reply Sat 17 Sep, 2011 03:26 pm
@izzythepush,
izzythepush wrote:

It's perfectly understandable that you should be concerned about the threat of anti-semitism throughout the diaspora. However, giving Israel carte-blanche to behave however it wants is not going to help tackle anti-semitism. The human rights of all minorities need to be respected. You can't just ignore Palestine's legitimate demand for self-determination and hope it will just go away. It won't.


Fine, but better minds than mine cannot seem to make progress with all participants. So, don't ask me to defer to giving one side more credence than the other.
0 Replies
 
Foofie
 
  2  
Reply Sat 17 Sep, 2011 03:28 pm
@izzythepush,
izzythepush wrote:

gungasnake wrote:

There is no further threat of holocausts coming from Christians; a second holocaust would be the work of slammites and shit4brains libtards like POOP and Hinkey here who either are slammites, are married to slammites, or are operating under some delusion that slammites might come for them last.


There is a very real threat coming from nazi tea party scum, like you and your mate Josef. At the momement your hatred for moslems is of paramount importance, but if they're ever subdued you'll turn on the Jews in a flash.


No. Jews as a group, I believe, serve a purpose to the conservative types. However, Jews do remain social pariahs to the conservative types, in my opinion. But that does not bother most Jews, since that was never a concern for two millenia.
0 Replies
 
Foofie
 
  3  
Reply Sat 17 Sep, 2011 03:34 pm
@Setanta,
Setanta wrote:

What a bullshit peddler you are. There is absolutely nothing in Catholic theology on the subject of Jews having a "homeland." That's been a creation of Zionists from the start. You should stop just making **** up because you are too ill-informed to othewise support your goofy arguments. What a ******* clown. What a disgusting racist.


Sorry, that is what I've read. Jews where supposed to wander (aka, the Wandering Jew) the face of the Earth for the end of time for rejecting Christ. Well, if it is not "official" Catholic doctrine, the church has been pretty ineffective in removing that canard from the Catholic popular culture for most of the last two millenia. You talk as though there was no church anti-Semitism prior to John the XXIII? Or, should I only think of individual clergy as instigators of anti-Semitism? Sort of like not holding the church reponsible for pedophile priests, just the individual priest that was a pedophile?
Foofie
 
  2  
Reply Sat 17 Sep, 2011 03:37 pm
@Walter Hinteler,
Walter Hinteler wrote:

Could it be that you had had previously a job in the Reich Ministry of Public Enlightenment and Propaganda ?


The winner does get to write the history books.
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Mon 19 Sep, 2011 01:30 am
Interesting poll conducted by the BBC today.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-14946179
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  2  
Reply Mon 19 Sep, 2011 03:32 am
@Foofie,
No, i don't talk as though . . . if you want to peddle your bullshit, you can do it without spreading lies about what i've said.

Loon.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  0  
Reply Mon 19 Sep, 2011 06:25 am
@izzythepush,
izzythepush wrote:
The reason that you've not responded to Josef cv's loathsome posts is because he is just like you, a hate-filled right-wing troglodyte.


Is there some reason you vermin always falsely accuse me of being just like you?

*You* are the one who recently was ranting about wishing you could confront posters face to face so you could boink them over the head with your caveman club. I don't share either your hatred or your caveman brutishness.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  0  
Reply Mon 19 Sep, 2011 06:28 am
@Walter Hinteler,
Walter Hinteler wrote:
oralloy wrote:
And as soon as the Palestinians join the ICC, it will be time for Israel to start sending Palestinian terrorists to The Hague for prosecution.


Now that's for the first time, I really applause here: you suggest that Israel should become a state party to the Statute of the Court - great.


I suggested nothing of the sort.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  0  
Reply Mon 19 Sep, 2011 06:28 am
@izzythepush,
izzythepush wrote:
Walter Hinteler wrote:
Now that's for the first time, I really applause here: you suggest that Israel should become a state party to the Statute of the Court - great.


It's probably the last time mate. Although it's not the first time that Fuckwit fucks up.


You vermin shouldn't run around falsely accusing your betters of your own stupidity.

And nope. No mess-ups on my part.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  0  
Reply Mon 19 Sep, 2011 06:29 am
@Walter Hinteler,
Walter Hinteler wrote:
And actually, Palestine is already a member as state with "acceptance of jurisdiction" [article 12(3) of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court].


There is a big difference between "the Palestinians accepting the ICC" and "the ICC accepting the Palestinians".

One of the reasons the Palestinians are pursuing this UN nonsense is because they want the ICC to finally let them bring charges against Israel.

As I already noted, if it works, the Palestinians are going to find that the ICC is not much interested in their fake accusations against Israel.

The ICC will be happy to prosecute Palestinian terrorists however.
oralloy
 
  0  
Reply Mon 19 Sep, 2011 06:31 am
@izzythepush,
izzythepush wrote:
You've got to stop it with all these 'Socialist' facts. You'll probably get a well thought out response like, 'They're only signatories so they can steal the pen.' Well obviously not as well thought out as that, but you get the point.


I'll leave such stupid ranting to you, if you don't mind, since your limited intelligence makes you much more suited for it.

I'll just keep defending the truth like I always do.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  0  
Reply Mon 19 Sep, 2011 06:58 am
@Walter Hinteler,
Walter Hinteler wrote:
Could it be that you had had previously a job in the Reich Ministry of Public Enlightenment and Propaganda ?


You are far closer to being a Nazi than I'll ever be.
oralloy
 
  0  
Reply Mon 19 Sep, 2011 06:58 am
@izzythepush,
izzythepush wrote:
Fuckwit's nazi credentials are beyond doubt, but I doubt even Goebbels would let such a dim-witted cretin write in anything other than crayon.


You vermin shouldn't run around falsely accusing your betters of your own Nazism and stupidity.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  2  
Reply Mon 19 Sep, 2011 06:58 am
@oralloy,
oralloy wrote:

There is a big difference between "the Palestinians accepting the ICC" and "the ICC accepting the Palestinians".


I didn't response anything regarding "the Palestinians accepting the ICC" and/or "the ICC accepting the Palestinians".

My response - and you even quoted it (sic!) - was re "Palestine". And here referring to the article 12(3) of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court.
Walter Hinteler
 
  3  
Reply Mon 19 Sep, 2011 07:06 am
@oralloy,
oralloy wrote:

Walter Hinteler wrote:
Could it be that you had had previously a job in the Reich Ministry of Public Enlightenment and Propaganda ?


You are far closer to being a Nazi than I'll ever be.


Did I accuse you of being a "Nazi"?

Sorry - my intention only was to point at your kind of argumentation. Which is quite similar to what was done here 70, 80 years ago.

When you mean that living here makes one close to being a Nazi, well, some would argue about that.

But your opinion is noted.
oralloy
 
  1  
Reply Mon 19 Sep, 2011 07:11 am
@Walter Hinteler,
Walter Hinteler wrote:
oralloy wrote:
There is a big difference between "the Palestinians accepting the ICC" and "the ICC accepting the Palestinians".


I didn't response anything regarding "the Palestinians accepting the ICC" and/or "the ICC accepting the Palestinians".


How do you think the ICC got that supposed jurisdiction that you referred to? The Palestinians went and accepted ICC jurisdiction over them.

Unfortunately for the Palestinians, the ICC has not been so quick to accept that they have such jurisdiction.

The Palestinians hope that this UN nonsense will change that, and get the ICC to let them start bringing charges against Israel.

When the Palestinians bring their false charges however, they will find to their dismay that the ICC has little interest in pursuing their bogus accusations against Israel.

But the ICC will be happy to prosecute the very real crimes that the Palestinians are carrying out.
gungasnake
 
  0  
Reply Mon 19 Sep, 2011 07:12 am
@oralloy,
Quote:
The ICC will be happy to prosecute Palestinian terrorists however.


That would be pretty much all of them (palesavages), wouldn't it? Does the ICC have the manpower for that??
0 Replies
 
gungasnake
 
  0  
Reply Mon 19 Sep, 2011 07:13 am
@oralloy,
Quote:

You [Hinkey] are far closer to being a Nazi than I'll ever be.


The Nazis didn't take idiots or blowhards.


0 Replies
 
gungasnake
 
  0  
Reply Mon 19 Sep, 2011 07:17 am
@oralloy,
Quote:
The Palestinians went and accepted ICC jurisdiction over them.


The would put the ICC in a position similar to somebody keeping dangerous animals in a residential neighborhood or something like that. I can't believe the ICC would sign up for anything like that.
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 12/24/2024 at 11:24:45