0
   

Palestinian Solidarity Campaign disrupts Israeli Concert. Yeah!!!

 
 
Setanta
 
  2  
Reply Sat 10 Sep, 2011 07:36 pm
He is out to lunch. The Zionists were in Palestine literally generations before World War II, and they had a plan then. The Zionists who made the Israeli state were not threatened by the holocaust, but have shamelessly exploited the guilt angle to further their ends. There is a problem with the idea that the Jews, in particular, are entitled to a homeland, while the same concept is not applied to other dispossessed and murdered ethnic groups, such as the Roma. The main problem, though, is that the Zionists don't just want a Jewish state, they want it in Palestine, and they have been practicing ethnic cleansing since before the Israeli state existed in order to have their Jewish state.
ossobuco
 
  2  
Reply Sat 10 Sep, 2011 07:51 pm
@Setanta,
Yes, I get that, though Foofie doesn't.

I said I turned around after 67, but then I also learned more from the past that supported my change, as you have annotated.

I haven't reviewed again all of your posts here but they all clicked with me.
0 Replies
 
fresco
 
  2  
Reply Sun 11 Sep, 2011 12:45 am
@Setanta,
Homework.
Compare and contrast the words "pogrom" and "holocaust" in the context of the development of Zionism.
(Marks will be deducted for use of the words "drivel", "clown" "hilarious", and any scatological terminology)
0 Replies
 
fresco
 
  2  
Reply Sun 11 Sep, 2011 01:21 am
@Setanta,
Homework
Discuss the concept of "homeland" with respect to the lifestyle of the Roma. (Marks will be deducted for use of the words "drivel", "clown" "hilarious", and any scatological terminology)
0 Replies
 
fresco
 
  1  
Reply Sun 11 Sep, 2011 02:44 am
@izzythepush,
Now to get back to the OP.

Pro-Israelis cannot complain about interruption of concert tactics, since such a group interrupted a similar concert given by a Moscow Orchestra on a previous occasion, over treatment of Jews in Russia. However, I question whether you as a Brit should be "proud" of such tactics, irrespective of your political leanings. Such tactics are a manifestation of "mob rule", an aspect of which manifested itself in the recent riots. Hopefully, we are not, as a nation, taking backward steps along a path for which others have respected us and looked to us for an example.
izzythepush
 
  2  
Reply Sun 11 Sep, 2011 03:34 am
@fresco,
I think this is an example of people power at its best. The BBC were courting controversy by asking the orchestra to the proms in the first place. In fact the BBC is very supine towards Israel, terrified of being accused of anti-semitism.

There were no arrests, this was not mob rule but peaceful protest. The riots were nothing like this.
Setanta
 
  3  
Reply Sun 11 Sep, 2011 04:45 am
Foofie is not the only one who peddles bullshit as though it were history. Most of the Roma are settled--usually in shanty-town ghettos--on the edges of towns and cities in central and eastern Europe. What we have here is the self-regarding "philosopher" promoting the stereotype of the Roma as intinerant con artists and thieves.

Just as with Foofie, appeals to the holocaust, and the inclusion of pogroms, does not address the issue of whether or not Zionists are entitled to dispossess a people in situ simply because, among other tactics, they successfully manipulate christian guilt about how Jews were treated in Europe.

But this is the kind of hilarious drivel we can expect from a clown such as this.
fresco
 
  1  
Reply Sun 11 Sep, 2011 06:57 am
@Setanta,
White man speak with forked ear !

0 Replies
 
fresco
 
  2  
Reply Sun 11 Sep, 2011 07:34 am
@izzythepush,
If your "people power" claim can be shown to have saved one life, or even to have converted one person to your cause, then you might have a point. I suspect the opposite might be true.
fresco
 
  2  
Reply Sun 11 Sep, 2011 07:39 am
@Setanta,
Laughing
Don't tell me you've descended to using the thumbs down button !
That would mean you really are past it !
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Sun 11 Sep, 2011 07:47 am
@fresco,
fresco wrote:

If your "people power" claim can be shown to have saved one life, or even to have converted one person to your cause, then you might have a point. I suspect the opposite might be true.


I know from personal experience it has. Friends have asked me what all the fuss is about, when I've told them, they've joined the boycott.

When governments ignore the will of the people you get assaults on embassies in Cairo. The BBC is our broadcaster, there's evidence coming out of Libya showing the disgusting things MI5 and 6 got up to in our name. We couldn't do anything about that, but we can join the boycott.
fresco
 
  2  
Reply Sun 11 Sep, 2011 08:58 am
@izzythepush,
Smile
If only life were that simple ! All I know is that we Brits sleep relatively peacefully in our beds, while distant "God-ists" and "nationalists" from either side engage in perpetual blood-letting and tit-for-tat tribalism. We have the luxury of commenting on "the land issue"( with no apparent consequence to ourselves), as though there were a practical or just solution to this, despite the fact that so far, the most intelligent negotiators have got nowhere.

Foofie
 
  2  
Reply Sun 11 Sep, 2011 09:44 am
@Finn dAbuzz,
Finn dAbuzz wrote:

I know the Fundamentalists hope the Jews will convert when they see Christ descending from Heaven in a nimbus of holy fire, but not to the extent that they aren't willing to sacrifice a few Bagel Benders to the tender mercies of Satan in order to facilitate The Rapture.

You being a bitter old Jew and all, I would have thought that you held Pastor Hagee in low regard.

But who knows?

Yours is a very interesting perspective Foofie, and I've enjoyed this thread very much as a result.


If there ever is any Messiah arriving on Earth, the first question to ask would be is this His first or second visit. Based on His answer, we would know which religion had it right. This is what Mayor Koch I believe has said in the past.

I do like John Hagee. Not just for his concern about Israel, but his pointing out that the theology he subscribes to is not the Replacement Theology (I think that is the term to use) that other Christian denominations may subscribe to. Meaning that when Christ arrived, his arrival replaced the Covenant with the Jews. John Hagee says, I believe, that the original Covenant with God and the Jews is still valid. That in a nutshell explains why anti-Semitism has flourished in Catholic Europe. Jews had no more value in monotheism with the arrival of Christ. John Hagee disputes that belief.

I am not a bitter old Jew. I am an optimist that we will mostly learn to accept our place in society, and stop resenting other groups, be they whites vs non-whites, non-Jews vs. Jews, uneducated vs. educated, haves vs have-nots. This might require a bit of futuristic societal engineering, but I believe with the help of academia and its minions, we will promulgate a culture of humility and acceptance. That might be just too optimistic for the 21st century?

0 Replies
 
Foofie
 
  2  
Reply Sun 11 Sep, 2011 09:54 am
@ossobuco,
ossobuco wrote:

I'm rarely nonplussed, but Foofie does that to me. I admit that I don't get into bunches of arguments with data back up hurling, though I appreciate data links generally.

This post of his (I assume but am not sure Foofie isn't a woman) really stops me, as in how can this be?

"You also, in my opinion, flippantly disenfranchise the 60 million Christian Zionists in the U.S., and others elsewhere, from their needing Israel to continue to exist as a Zionist state, based on their faith's theology. I understand that you have posted your lack of following your childhood religious teachings; however, I do find people from a Catholic background often showing an attitude that the world would be better off with assimilated Jews (aka, no Jews). That is just my opinion, since I have noticed that so many people of a Catholic background seem to find it very hard to commiserate with the Jewish awareness of almost being exterminated in WWII, and how that has resulted in a desire for a Jewish state."


This guy is out to lunch, at least in my lifetime and places.


Edit - and I read widely.


That is my conclusion from decades of observing many a Catholic reaction to any Jew talking about the Holocaust, which is like when are Jews going to stop obsessing over the Holocaust? The answer is never! Like they still obsess over the Exodus. So did Jesus at the Last Supper (a Passover seder).
0 Replies
 
Foofie
 
  2  
Reply Sun 11 Sep, 2011 09:59 am
@Setanta,
Setanta wrote:

He is out to lunch. The Zionists were in Palestine literally generations before World War II, and they had a plan then. The Zionists who made the Israeli state were not threatened by the holocaust, but have shamelessly exploited the guilt angle to further their ends. There is a problem with the idea that the Jews, in particular, are entitled to a homeland, while the same concept is not applied to other dispossessed and murdered ethnic groups, such as the Roma. The main problem, though, is that the Zionists don't just want a Jewish state, they want it in Palestine, and they have been practicing ethnic cleansing since before the Israeli state existed in order to have their Jewish state.


You forgot to mention that the early Zionists were mainly Russian Jews that already enjoyed the Orthodox Christian love of Jews for centuries, with pogroms that often started right after the Easter service.

It is hard for Jews to continue to bore Gentiles with the litany of persecution through the centuries, so yes, they do harp on the most recent, and most efficient attempt at genocide.

Sorry, if Jews try not to bore everyone with the complete list of Christian driven atrocities.

But, don't think I'm anti-Christian. When non-Jews have been nice to me, they usually are church going Christians, rather than the Christmas and Easter only type.
Foofie
 
  2  
Reply Sun 11 Sep, 2011 10:03 am
@Setanta,
Setanta wrote:

Just as with Foofie, appeals to the holocaust, and the inclusion of pogroms, does not address the issue of whether or not Zionists are entitled to dispossess a people in situ simply because, among other tactics, they successfully manipulate christian guilt about how Jews were treated in Europe.



Circular logic. Christians have Christian guilt over the historical treatment of Jews, because they are Christian and know what guilt is.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Sun 11 Sep, 2011 10:03 am
@Foofie,
It's not a question of boredom, and as usual, you just don't get it. No matter what someone else has done to Jews, that does not legitimize the oppression and murder of Palestinians.
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Sun 11 Sep, 2011 10:05 am
@fresco,
I won't tell you that, because i never use the function. Your own stupidity is the surest condemnation of the drivel you post.
Foofie
 
  1  
Reply Sun 11 Sep, 2011 10:14 am
@fresco,
fresco wrote:

Smile
If only life were that simple ! All I know is that we Brits sleep relatively peacefully in our beds, while distant "God-ists" and "nationalists" from either side engage in perpetual blood-letting and tit-for-tat tribalism. We have the luxury of commenting on "the land issue"( with no apparent consequence to ourselves), as though there were a practical or just solution to this, despite the fact that so far, the most intelligent negotiators have got nowhere.




But, should one question why so much energy is given to a piece of land the size of New Jersey, when so many other atrocities are committed in the word, and even the Middle East. That is why I have to think that some people have issues with Jews that goes far beyond the present situation. Some people might not be classic anti-Semites, but possibly neo-anti-Semites. They might resent to no end the thought of Jews being an autonomous people and perhaps growing in number to the point where they might one day become an additional game in town. Remember, without the Jews, the only two monotheistic games in town are the Moslems and Christians.

If Israel was allowed to thrive in peace, then think of all the wasted energy of earlier generations of anti-Semites. Sort of like cheapening the sacrifice of all those that spent time and energy to trivialize Jews in a civilization that they contributed to.

Remembering Yossarian's concern in Catch-22 that his "precious bodily fluids" were at risk, I make the analogy that anti-Zionists might want my precious bodily genes" to use for their own culture. In effect, I believe the goal is not extermination, but assimilation. I would hate to see that.
0 Replies
 
Foofie
 
  1  
Reply Sun 11 Sep, 2011 10:17 am
@Setanta,
Setanta wrote:

It's not a question of boredom, and as usual, you just don't get it. No matter what someone else has done to Jews, that does not legitimize the oppression and murder of Palestinians.


Correct, it does not; however, it explains why they are doing it, and rational people might realize that one is dealing with a people that have been emotionally wounded over centuries, so the wise thing to do is make concessions, rather than obstinately call for the dissolution of the Zionist State.
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.09 seconds on 11/23/2024 at 01:10:58