Does Gun Control Prove Liberalism To Be Fundamentally EVIL??

Forums: Guns, Put Down Your Weapon, Gun Owners Are Losers, Cowardly Gun Owners, Guns Are Very Bad
Email this Topic • Print this Page

Does Gun Control Prove Liberalism
To Be Fundamentally EVIL??

Gun control disarms the future victims of predatory violence,
thereby making predators SAFER during their perpetration of evil.
Does this show that liberals basically, fundamentally love EVIL????

Topic Stats
Top Replies
Link to this Topic

Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 3,696 • Replies: 67

@OmSigDAVID,

If u were an evil person,
a robber or a murderer:
woud u want your victim to be HELPLESS, or to be defensively WELL ARMED???

David

1 Reply

@OmSigDAVID,

OmSigDAVID wrote:

If u were an evil person,
a robber or a murderer:
woud u want your victim to be HELPLESS, or to be defensively WELL ARMED???

Evil people would probably want to be armed to the teeth. Liberal gun laws make that far more likely.

1 Reply

@izzythepush,

OmSigDAVID wrote:

If u were an evil person,
a robber or a murderer:
woud u want your victim to be HELPLESS, or to be defensively WELL ARMED???

izzythepush wrote:

Evil people would probably want to be armed to the teeth.

ANY person who desired to be ABLE
to control a predatory emergency woud want to be well armed,
rather than to concede a monopoly of power to the predator.

izzythepush wrote:

Liberal gun laws make that far more likely.

That post is ambiguously confusing.
"Liberal" in America means deviating from (distorting) the US Constitution.
I don 't know from what gun laws woud deviate in England that thay be "liberal".

David

2 Replies

@OmSigDAVID,

Quote:

"Liberal" in America means deviating from (distorting) the US Constitution.

Jesus Murphy, he claims to have been a lawyer and still a Mensan. It just ain't possible!

0 Replies

@OmSigDAVID,

OmSigDAVID wrote:

"Liberal" in America means deviating from (distorting) the US Constitution.

Bollocks. That's the OSD definition.

2 Replies

@izzythepush,

Quote:

lib·er·al /ˈlɪbərəl, ˈlɪbrəl/ [lib-er-uhl, lib-ruhl]

adjective
1. favorable to progress or reform, as in political or religious affairs.
2. ( often initial capital letter ) noting or pertaining to a political party advocating measures of progressive political reform.
3. of, pertaining to, based on, or advocating liberalism.
4. favorable to or in accord with concepts of maximum individual freedom possible, especially as guaranteed by law and secured by governmental protection of civil liberties.
5. favoring or permitting freedom of action, especially with respect to matters of personal belief or expression: a liberal policy toward dissident artists and writers.

6. of or pertaining to representational forms of government rather than aristocracies and monarchies.
7. free from prejudice or bigotry; tolerant: a liberal attitude toward foreigners.
8. open-minded or tolerant, especially free of or not bound by traditional or conventional ideas, values, etc.
9. characterized by generosity and willingness to give in large amounts: a liberal donor.
10. given freely or abundantly; generous: a liberal donation.
11. not strict or rigorous; free; not literal: a liberal interpretation of a rule.
12. of, pertaining to, or based on the liberal arts.
13. of, pertaining to, or befitting a freeman.

Noun
14. a person of liberal principles or views, especially in politics or religion.

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/liberal

1 Reply

@tsarstepan,

That shows that the lexicografer who wrote those definitions
was a self-congratulatory leftist, who loves to pat himself on the back,
but whose 11th defintion was accurate.

David

1 Reply

@izzythepush,

OmSigDAVID wrote:

"Liberal" in America means deviating from (distorting) the US Constitution.

izzythepush wrote:

Bollocks. That's the OSD definition.

No; that was the concept long before I was born.
I merely learned it, like I learned arithmetic.

"Liberal" is simply the opposite of "orthodox".

David

1 Reply

@OmSigDAVID,

OmSigDAVID wrote:

"Liberal" is simply the opposite of "orthodox".

Black is simply the opposite of white. That's the beauty of monochrome thinking.

1 Reply

@izzythepush,

OmSigDAVID wrote:

"Liberal" is simply the opposite of "orthodox".

izzythepush wrote:

Black is simply the opposite of white. That's the beauty of monochrome thinking.

What is your point??

1 Reply

@OmSigDAVID,

The fact that you don't understand it, proves it. That's my point.

1 Reply

@OmSigDAVID,

Quote:

That shows that the lexicografer who wrote those definitions
was a self-congratulatory leftist,

Another fine illustration that points to the depth of your delusional nature, Dave.

0 Replies

@izzythepush,

izzythepush wrote:

The fact that you don't understand it, proves it. That's my point.

Your definition of TRUTH
is anything that I don 't understand.
I don 't understand how it was good
for any German to vote for the Nazis,
therefore (according to Izzy) that proves it MUST be true that it was good to vote Nazi.

David

2 Replies

@OmSigDAVID,

That is another example of your deluded thinking.

2 Replies

@OmSigDAVID,

Quote:

I don 't understand how it was good for any German to vote for the Nazis,

Another inane OmSig tangent. But let's run with it for a bit, Dave.

It was "good" in the sense that the Nazis promised to restore Germany to her rightful place. The Nazis only had less than a ten year run and in that time they certainly did do a lot of grave damage.

Compare that to the US, which has been inflicting this same grave damage upon the innocents of the world for well over a century. The citizens of the US who have voted, time and again, for governments that have been every bit as brutal, every bit as murderous in volume as the Nazis were, are no different than the average German citizen.

1 Reply

@izzythepush,

Iz I've decided to ignore this moron, gun nut Dave, I'm believe
he feeds on the attention.
Probably the only interaction with human beings he has and
he doesn't deserve it.
Let him rant and rave at himself or with the other misfits
(you know who you are) for a while. Starve them of their
oxygen so to speak.

0 Replies

@OmSigDAVID,

Quote:

Does Gun Control Prove Liberalism
To Be Fundamentally EVIL??...

You might could attribute gun-control propensities to stupidity, but that thing with Gibson Guitars is definitely beyond stupidity and into the realm of evil.

1 Reply

@gungasnake,

Quote:

You might could attribute gun-control ...

A southerner, are you, Snake?

0 Replies

@izzythepush,

izzythepush wrote:

That is another example of your deluded thinking.

U can do better than that.

0 Replies

Does Gun Control Prove Liberalism To Be Fundamentally EVIL??

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know