14
   

Here are the issues that could beat Texas' Rick Perry

 
 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 Sep, 2011 09:54 am
@JTT,
September 8, 2011
Fact-checking Rick Perry and Mitt Romney claims from GOP debate
By Aman Batheja | The Fort Worth Star-Telegram

An examination of the truthfulness of claims made during Wednesday night's Republican presidential debate:

Texas jobs, part 1

Claim: Perry said, "We've created 1 million jobs in the state of Texas the same time America lost 2.5 million."

True or false? Mostly true. Perry became governor in December 2000. Between then and July 2011, Texas gained just over 1 million jobs, and the rest of the country lost 2.45 million jobs, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

Texas jobs, part 2

Claim: Mitt Romney said, "George Bush and his predecessor created jobs at a faster rate than [Perry] did." "That's not correct," Perry insisted. "Yes, that is correct," Romney said.

True of false? Romney was right. Employment numbers from the Bureau of Labor Statistics show that the number of jobs in Texas grew nearly 3 percent annually while Ann Richards was governor and about 5 percent per year under Bush. Over Perry's 11 years as governor, job growth has averaged less than 2 percent per year.

Massachusetts jobs

Claim: Perry said, "Michael Dukakis created jobs three times faster than you did, Mitt."

True or false? Mostly true. Dukakis was governor from 1975-79 and 1983-91. Dukakis, a Democrat, saw employment grow by 500,000 jobs during his two divided terms, a rate of more than 41,000 jobs a year.

Romney, governor of Massachusetts from 2003-07, saw employment rise from 3.23 million to 3.29 million, growth of about 60,000 jobs, or 15,000 a year. That's not quite three times faster than Romney's job-creation record.

HPV vaccine

Claim: Ron Paul said Perry signed an executive order that amounted to "forcing 12-year-old girls to take an inoculation to prevent this sexually transmitted disease."

True or false? True. Perry signed an executive order in 2007 requiring the Texas Health and Human Services Commission adopt rules mandating that all girls entering sixth grade receive a vaccination against certain types of HPV, a sexually transmitted virus. The Legislature ultimately overturned Perry's order. As Perry mentioned in the debate, his executive order "allowed for an opt-out."

The opt-out process involved using a form that parents were already able to use to enroll their children in school if they lacked other immunizations required by the states. As PolitiFact Texas reported in 2010, however, some private schools in Texas do not accept those forms, meaning that for some Texas girls, the executive order could have effectively served as a mandate.

Graduation rates

Claim: Defending his record on education, Perry said "graduation rates now are up to 84 percent" in Texas.

True or false? True. The Texas Education Agency reported in May that the on-time graduation rate for the Class of 2010 was 84.3 percent, an increase of 3.7 percentage points over the previous year. However, critics could find less flattering numbers. Other states and various national groups measure graduation rates differently. Historically, some of those national metrics have reported a lower rate for Texas.

Star-Telegram researcher Cathy Belcher contributed to this report, which includes material from The Associated Press.

Read more: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2011/09/08/123460/fact-checking-rick-perry-and-mitt.html#ixzz1XNQc0Uap
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Sun 18 Sep, 2011 12:13 pm
@BumbleBeeBoogie,
September 18, 2011
New 'super PAC' aims to raise $55 million for Rick Perry
By Maria Recio | McClatchy Newspapers

WASHINGTON — Texas Gov. Rick Perry, the GOP presidential front-runner, may be leading the pack in the money game as well, as a new "super PAC" supporting him gears up to raise $55 million or more — a potential game changer for the 2012 race.

The new pro-Perry political action committee, Make Us Great Again, is one of the emerging "super PACs" that started springing up after last year's groundbreaking Supreme Court ruling in Citizen's United v. FEC, which allowed unlimited cash from individuals and corporations for PACs that are separate from a candidate's campaign.

"These are new vehicles for vast sums of money," said Bill Miller, an Austin, Texas, political consultant to Republicans and Democrats who is not affiliated with Perry. "It's a new day in campaign finance. They're going to play an incredible role."

The Make Us Great Again PAC promises to set a new pace, flooding Iowa and other early voting states with ads.

"Super PACs can make or break a presidential candidate," said Virginia-based GOP consultant Tom Edmonds. "The incredible amount of money they can raise and spend has incredible influence."

A pro-Perry PAC spokesman, Jason Miller, confirmed that "an early planning document" had set the $55 million figure, first reported by NBC News, but he declined to release any updated amount. "Fundraising is going very well and there's a lot of enthusiasm for Gov. Perry," he said.

Mark McKinnon, a Texas consultant who worked with former President George W. Bush, said, "It ain't chump change. And I suspect every penny will be used to attack Romney." Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney is Perry's closest rival.

The committees by law may not coordinate with a candidate's campaign. But the Perry super PAC has some built-in radar: It's led by Austin lobbyist Mike Toomey, a former Perry chief of staff, who is in tune with his former boss's thinking. Toomey recently got some national attention in the GOP debate for his role representing Merck, the maker of the Gardasil vaccine for human papillomavirus that Perry ordered all Texas young girls to be inoculated with. The Texas legislature overruled Perry's order.

The super PAC for Perry is likely to amplify charges that the Texas governor is too close to moneyed interests as part of Austin's pay-to-play political culture, where lucrative government contracts often are awarded to those who've made big campaign contributions. Perry himself became a millionaire while serving in relatively low-paying government posts over the past 20 years by making lucrative investments that benefitted from his connections to special interests with business before the state government. This week both Rep. Michele Bachmann, R-Minn., and former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin have challenged Perry for being ensnared in what they called "crony capitalism."

At the Perry campaign, political adviser David Carney said, "I have no clue what any other entity is doing, fundraising or otherwise. I don't believe everything I read. We are working hard to build our campaign team on all fronts: finance, political, organizational, and operations. Time will tell if we ever catch up with our competitors, who in some cases have been running for months if not years."

Federal rules for campaign fundraising outside of the super PACs limit individual contributions to $2,500 per election cycle, making the non-affiliated committees an easier way to raise large sums.

"The sky is absolutely the limit," said Michael Beckel, spokesman at the Center for Responsive Politics, whose website, opensecrets.org, tracks political money. "This is the first election cycle where super PACs will be used by any presidential candidate." Already, the pro-Perry super PAC's projected $55 million fund is almost as much as the $63.5 million that all super PACs spent in the 2010 elections, according to opensecrets.org.

"The whole rise of super PACs is troubling," said Craig McDonald, director of Texans for Public Justice, a watchdog group that questions how separate the new PACs will be from the campaigns they champion. "It allows corporate money into campaigns. It allows an entry point for special favors for donors."

Donors will be made public, but Miller said the pro-Perry PAC won't have to file its first report until January.

Perry is particularly adept at raising large sums of money because in Texas campaigns, individual contributions are unlimited. And as Texas' longest-serving governor, Perry raised nearly $100 million from 2001 through October 23, 2010, with nearly 50 percent of it coming from 193 mega-donors who gave him $100,000 or more.

Mississippi-based Perry fundraiser Henry Barbour, a nephew of Mississippi Gov. Haley Barbour, is raising money for the campaign, not the independent Make Us Great Again PAC. But he sees the new super PACs as powerful forces.

"You can do a lot with $55 million," said Barbour. "You're talking about having real impact in early states. It translates into helping promote the image of Gov. Perry or promoting the strengths of their candidate and expose the weaknesses of their opposition. It can be powerful if it's done right."

Read more: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2011/09/18/124337/new-super-pac-aims-to-raise-55.html#ixzz1YKSi9aGK
0 Replies
 
Sglass
 
  1  
Reply Thu 22 Sep, 2011 08:59 pm
@JTT,
We good JTT how are you.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
GAFFNEY: Whose side is Obama on? - Discussion by gungasnake
 
Copyright © 2019 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 08/21/2019 at 07:51:14