@Ben Smith,
Ben Smith wrote:I think it's disingenuous to claim 100,000+ membership when it's patently obvious there's not, that's all.
....
But like I said, no big deal.
You are spending a lot of time arguing over something you consider to be small potatoes.
For the record, I began this thread as a lark, I wasn't serious...or was I?...that there are only 13 members. As to the number of members and the lack of inactive member purging, ossobuco placed the answer nicely, I've include certain parts here and have a further response to it after for you Ben Smith.
ossobuco wrote:
We've seen people come and go, and come back again, including the person who started this thread - and some even after a couple of years, and go again, and come back again.
There isn't book cooking here.
To somehow cull the large number who signed up for membership is not a task a free site with volunteer moderators needs to get involved in, even if it was feasible.
If you have further doubts, use the contact us link at the bottom of the page.
When I looked through my past posts I had a run from Sept.2009 to Augustt.2010 where I didn't make a single post.
Prior that, I went from May 2007 to June 2009 with no postings, I was off doing other things (like nearly croaking and then physically rehabbing among other things.
As ossobuco put it we sign up, some make a few posts some none, some disappear for times. I have to ask Ben Smith, what does it matter in the day to day? I'd really dread having to come here one day and find I'd been purged from the rolls because I was off elsewhere or without computer access for a period of time.
I prefer looking at the membership numbers which are shown as indicating the number of people what found this site and felt it worthy to register at.
Now come on Ben and join the other 13 of us and help radicalize the free radicals here, it'll be good for your equilibrium.
We now return to our regular programming.