4
   

payoff = result? It seems not accurate enough

 
 
Reply Sat 16 Jul, 2011 09:47 pm

Context:

"The payoff doesn't really come from making a copy of something that already exists," said George Church, a professor of genetics at Harvard Medical School who led the research effort in collaboration with Joe Jacobson, an associate professor at the Media Lab at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. "You have to change it -- functionally and radically."

More:
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/07/110714142130.htm
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Question • Score: 4 • Views: 1,218 • Replies: 17
No top replies

 
tsarstepan
 
  1  
Reply Sat 16 Jul, 2011 10:39 pm
@oristarA,
I not sure that it means monetary rewards but it could mean some kind of acknowledgement of intellectual discovery or success.
oristarA
 
  1  
Reply Sat 16 Jul, 2011 11:23 pm
@tsarstepan,
tsarstepan wrote:

I not sure that it means monetary rewards but it could mean some kind of acknowledgement of intellectual discovery or success.


Thank you.

Could you replace it with another most close word?
wayne
 
  1  
Reply Sat 16 Jul, 2011 11:26 pm
@oristarA,
I think it means more than just result, positive result is more like it.

You could say, "Gains don't really result from"....
0 Replies
 
tsarstepan
 
  1  
Reply Sat 16 Jul, 2011 11:29 pm
@oristarA,
This one is a toughie!
Perhaps honor?
oristarA wrote:


The honor doesn't really come from making a copy of something that already exists," said George Church, a professor of genetics at Harvard Medical School who led the research effort in collaboration with Joe Jacobson, an associate professor at the Media Lab at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. "You have to change it -- functionally and radically."


tsarstepan
 
  1  
Reply Sat 16 Jul, 2011 11:32 pm
@tsarstepan,
Something on the lines of ... It's no good just to duplicate or clone another person's work. One has to improve on it in order to deserve the accolades.
0 Replies
 
oristarA
 
  1  
Reply Sat 16 Jul, 2011 11:53 pm
Thank you both.

The replies are inspirational.
0 Replies
 
contrex
 
  1  
Reply Sun 17 Jul, 2011 12:11 am
I don't think the professor's talk of a "payoff" was about "deserving accolades". The success he refers to is the creation of different cells by manipulating the genome.
oristarA
 
  1  
Reply Sun 17 Jul, 2011 06:21 am
@contrex,
contrex wrote:

I don't think the professor's talk of a "payoff" was about "deserving accolades". The success he refers to is the creation of different cells by manipulating the genome.



Cool
0 Replies
 
McTag
 
  1  
Reply Sun 17 Jul, 2011 01:25 pm

The reward, it means.
oristarA
 
  1  
Reply Mon 18 Jul, 2011 12:48 am
@McTag,
McTag wrote:


The reward, it means.


Well, what is puzzling is, the professor said:"You have to change it ."

You have to change the reward? Oh, God save me.
McTag
 
  1  
Reply Mon 18 Jul, 2011 04:05 am
@oristarA,

The professor seems to be saying (I can't tell exactly, because the excerpt you provide does not include the context) that the REWARD (payoff) in a course of action (research project?) cannot come from copying results and conclusions from work which has been done previously.
You have to CHANGE it (to make a worthwhile breakthrough?)
oristarA
 
  1  
Reply Mon 18 Jul, 2011 04:16 am
@McTag,
McTag wrote:


The professor seems to be saying (I can't tell exactly, because the excerpt you provide does not include the context) that the REWARD (payoff) in a course of action (research project?) cannot come from copying results and conclusions from work which has been done previously.
You have to CHANGE it (to make a worthwhile breakthrough?)


   Not very consistent.

Click the link in the first post: the article started awkward. It's one of the "****" articles that I've translated into Chinese.

McTag
 
  1  
Reply Mon 18 Jul, 2011 04:30 am
@oristarA,

I have quickly read the article you linked, and from what I can understand, the professor is saying (on the subject of manipulating genetical material) that the rewards (in this field of research) are not in replicating already-existing cells, but in artificially creating new ones.
oristarA
 
  1  
Reply Mon 18 Jul, 2011 04:58 am
@McTag,
McTag wrote:


I have quickly read the article you linked, and from what I can understand, the professor is saying (on the subject of manipulating genetical material) that the rewards (in this field of research) are not in replicating already-existing cells, but in artificially creating new ones.


  Oh, they (the Harvard team) don't have the ability to creat a completely artificial new cells in any near future, which would be a miracle. The evidence, for example, is that they are not able to create the power house of a cell, mitochondria, which is till too complicated to make one artificially.

0 Replies
 
contrex
 
  1  
Reply Mon 18 Jul, 2011 12:48 pm
Many people seem to think that the professor was making some sweeping statement about the philosophy of research and the rewards thereof; I don't think he is. He is making a much more narrowly focussed remark about what is required to achieve a successful practical outcome in the research he is involved in.
0 Replies
 
igm
 
  1  
Reply Mon 18 Jul, 2011 01:59 pm
@oristarA,
oristarA wrote:


Context:

"The payoff doesn't really come from making a copy of something that already exists," said George Church, a professor of genetics at Harvard Medical School who led the research effort in collaboration with Joe Jacobson, an associate professor at the Media Lab at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. "You have to change it -- functionally and radically."

More:
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/07/110714142130.htm


If you used 'real value' that might work.
oristarA
 
  1  
Reply Mon 18 Jul, 2011 08:34 pm
@igm,
igm wrote:

oristarA wrote:


Context:

"The payoff doesn't really come from making a copy of something that already exists," said George Church, a professor of genetics at Harvard Medical School who led the research effort in collaboration with Joe Jacobson, an associate professor at the Media Lab at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. "You have to change it -- functionally and radically."

More:
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/07/110714142130.htm


If you used 'real value' that might work.


Good point.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

deal - Question by WBYeats
Let pupils abandon spelling rules, says academic - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Please, I need help. - Question by imsak
Is this sentence grammatically correct? - Question by Sydney-Strock
"come from" - Question by mcook
concentrated - Question by WBYeats
 
  1. Forums
  2. » payoff = result? It seems not accurate enough
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.07 seconds on 04/27/2024 at 09:01:19