2
   

The power ? Whose power? Harvard researchers'?

 
 
Reply Sat 16 Jul, 2011 01:08 am

Context:
ScienceDaily (July 14, 2011) — The power to edit genes is as revolutionary, immediately useful and unlimited in its potential as was Johannes Gutenberg's printing press. And like Gutenberg's invention, most DNA editing tools are slow, expensive, and hard to use -- a brilliant technology in its infancy. Now, Harvard researchers developing genome-scale editing tools as fast and easy as word processing have rewritten the genome of living cells using the genetic equivalent of search and replace -- and combined those rewrites in novel cell strains, strikingly different from their forebears.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Question • Score: 2 • Views: 535 • Replies: 15
No top replies

 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Sat 16 Jul, 2011 04:24 am
@oristarA,
I consider it poor writing. The introductory sentence is not ascribing the power to do this to anyone. It is an abstract statement, which ought to have been written: The power to edit genes would be as revolutionary, immediately useful . . . (etc.); the author then could have explained that the editing of genes is in its infancy, and continued with a discussion of the Harvard researchers.
oristarA
 
  1  
Reply Sat 16 Jul, 2011 04:42 am
@Setanta,
Setanta wrote:

I consider it poor writing. The introductory sentence is not ascribing the power to do this to anyone. It is an abstract statement, which ought to have been written: The power to edit genes would be as revolutionary, immediately useful . . . (etc.); the author then could have explained that the editing of genes is in its infancy, and continued with a discussion of the Harvard researchers.


Thank you Set.
oristarA
 
  1  
Reply Sat 16 Jul, 2011 04:58 am
@oristarA,
In " and combined those rewrites in novel cell strains, strikingly different from their forebears" in that context, what are "strikingly different from their forebears?" The "novel cell strains?"
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Sat 16 Jul, 2011 05:03 am
@oristarA,
Yeah, so it seems.
oristarA
 
  1  
Reply Sat 16 Jul, 2011 05:07 am
@Setanta,
Setanta wrote:

Yeah, so it seems.


Thank you.

Is the writing awkward? It looks elusive for me to catch it.

The biggest question remained is what to be "combined" with there?
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Sat 16 Jul, 2011 05:33 am
"Re-writes"
contrex
 
  1  
Reply Sat 16 Jul, 2011 05:42 am
@Setanta,
Setanta wrote:

"Re-writes"


He started a whole new thread about this...
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Sat 16 Jul, 2011 05:44 am
Jesus wept . . .
0 Replies
 
oristarA
 
  1  
Reply Sat 16 Jul, 2011 06:50 am
@contrex,
contrex wrote:

Setanta wrote:

"Re-writes"


He started a whole new thread about this...



Here "rewrite" serves as a noun, which is novel to me.
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Sat 16 Jul, 2011 06:57 am
So, because it's novel to you, you thought i was lying to you?
contrex
 
  1  
Reply Sat 16 Jul, 2011 07:27 am
@oristarA,
oristarA wrote:

Here "rewrite" serves as a noun, which is novel to me.


Quote:
re·write
noun \ˈrē-ˌrīt\
1
: a piece of writing (as a news story) constructed by rewriting
2
: an act or instance of rewriting


http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/rewrite%5B2%5D

oristarA
 
  1  
Reply Sat 16 Jul, 2011 08:03 am
@Setanta,
Setanta wrote:

So, because it's novel to you, you thought i was lying to you?


Never have I thought you were lying.
oristarA
 
  1  
Reply Sat 16 Jul, 2011 08:04 am
@contrex,
contrex wrote:

oristarA wrote:

Here "rewrite" serves as a noun, which is novel to me.


Quote:
re·write
noun \ˈrē-ˌrīt\
1
: a piece of writing (as a news story) constructed by rewriting
2
: an act or instance of rewriting


http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/rewrite%5B2%5D




Thank you.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Sat 16 Jul, 2011 08:16 am
@oristarA,
I didn't actually believe you'd thought i was lying--i was indulging a fit of pique.
oristarA
 
  1  
Reply Sat 16 Jul, 2011 09:12 pm
@Setanta,
Setanta wrote:

I didn't actually believe you'd thought i was lying--i was indulging a fit of pique.


I'm glad to think it is over now.

Cheers.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

deal - Question by WBYeats
Let pupils abandon spelling rules, says academic - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Please, I need help. - Question by imsak
Is this sentence grammatically correct? - Question by Sydney-Strock
"come from" - Question by mcook
concentrated - Question by WBYeats
 
  1. Forums
  2. » The power ? Whose power? Harvard researchers'?
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/04/2024 at 08:28:46