@edgarblythe,
edgarblythe wrote:
He is focusing on intelligent life on other planets. I think he assumes we already are in contact with Earthly organisms.
That is, perhaps, a presumptuous assumption as it applies to "we". Most Americans have a kindergarten level of knowledge when it comes to Natural History, that is, virtually no knowledge at all about the other organisms with which we share the planet.
The natural history education in this country is nil, and anything taught by a teacher on this subject is extracurricular.
I'm talking about the lack of ability to even identify a few plants, trees, insects, or birds, etc. It's like we're aliens that have just arrived on this planet and have no knowledge or even an interest in gaining knowledge on its natural history.
It's like we're still living with The credo of the Dark Ages, geocentrism and anthropocentrism, where every living thing on this planet is here just for our utility and doesn't have a right to live for its own sake. Virtually nothing has a right to live unless it's threatened or endangered and then gains special protection. I'm not talking about needing laws for protection, I'm talking about an anthropocentric attitude engendered by our archaic religious credo that has to change if the natural world is to survive and we can avoid a "Soylent Green" future.