Structures of Epithelia Found in a Martian Meteorite

Stop using "Paleontology" as a valid TAG. Your stuff is bogus and not in any way attacjhed to competent scientific investigation. You seem to start with some silly stupid conclusion and then make up evidence as you go.

It's the Mr. Kazoo theory of the universe!

You have no logic.:
1. This meteorite is basically a fossil, not a rock. So, I don't care how geologists classify this meteorite into an igneous rock or into a sedimentary rock. Meteorite ALH84001 has been ERRONEOUSLY classified by meteorite researchers once.This is a big problem for all geologists, not a problem for me, the finder of fossils in your testis or in any igneous rock or in any Martian meteorite. Wake up.
2. How can you disprove my article when you cannot even identify the marked structures as minerals?

I can see that. I do speak wth a little authority here but you are dead wrong in your conclusions. If you keep it up Im sure someone will take all your "evidence " apart by showing you the impossible chasms of
fact that separate your evidence from your conclusions. I have neither the interest nor the time . I can see that the mineral thin sections DO NOT asupport anything of which you speak and you are just delusional about any implied connections or similarities.

Please define what you think a "fossil" is, and what it is composed of.

My claim can be disproved only by identifying and proving the structures marked in my figures as minerals (or non-life material). No one can ever do that. So, my claim is correct.

Its already been done at JPL and at Sandia. The mineral assemblages for the carbonatitse and the {(X)Ca;(1-X)Na} mixed plagioclases are easily seen to be a "Solid solution" from Albite to Anorthite.

My claim is that there is a miniature unicorn in orbit around Pluto. And no one can disprove it. So, my claim is correct.

(do you see now why your statement is irrational)

My article said clearly that if a plagioclase, no matter albite or others, is simply a fossilized muscle fiber if the "plagioclese" shows all the characteristic structures of muscle fibers as found in my figures.

You can never show a micrograph to prove the "plagioclase" or "albite" contains the same structures as shown in my figures.

You are full of **** and have no idea of what the hell youre even speaking .