An Example Of The New Civility

This is the face of the left, folks. Exactly who and what is the SEIU?
http://nrd.nationalreview.com/article/?q=ZGFmMDY4NzdkMmIwZTQ1MzU2ZDA4NGZhNzJlNGU2MTE=

"SEIU has given ACORN nearly $6 million since 2006 — including $250,000 this year — according to U.S. Department of Labor disclosures and the union’s own statements. Some of this money took the form of grants, but ACORN also received significant sums for doing the SEIU’s dirty work. In 2007, the SEIU paid ACORN $140,000 to harass a shopping-mall operator called General Growth Properties that would not let the union use the card-check process to organize the company’s janitors (more on card check later). According to the company, ACORN’s tactics included “making allegations and filing unsubstantiated claims with government agencies, then implying in handbills and press releases that the claims — before they are even investigated, let alone proved — are fact.”

0 Replies

More of the sickness from the left.
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2011/06/wapo_and_the_times_call_for_online_activists_to_help_smear_palin.html

0 Replies

Oh my. This must be the fault of that mean old nasty Fox news........Uh, um.........Associated Press........never mind.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/06/12/some-gay-rights-foes-claim-now-are-bullied/

1 Reply

@Renaldo Dubois,

Quote:

"Diversions, scare tactics and this playing the victim are all they have left."

It seems to be all you have left as well Renaldo.

Those mean old bullies that don't quote your entire post. You poor thing.

1 Reply

@parados,

naw, you're not a bully. You're just dishonest.

1 Reply

@Renaldo Dubois,

So.. failure to quote someone entirely is dishonest?

Is that what you are saying Renaldo?
Do you stand by that statement?
Do you always stand by that statement?

What about someone that partially quotes someone else but doesn't state who they are quoting? Would that be dishonest?

1 Reply

@parados,

YOU are dishonest.

2 Replies

@Renaldo Dubois,

Well thats it. You are dishonest. You have been branded so by Renaldo. If anyone knows about dishonesty its Renaldo. Do they have one of those little icons for tongue in cheek?

1 Reply

@RABEL222,

This is a really good Op. Thought I'd share it with you.
http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/06/the_alinsky_alert_system.html

0 Replies

@Renaldo Dubois,

I see.. Dishonesty is simply who you declare is dishonest.
You have no actual standard by which to judge dishonesty, it seems.

That would be lying to yourself Renaldo which most people would consider dishonest but you seem to live in some bizarre world where you get to simply make declarations and it becomes truth because you said it.

1 Reply

@parados,

When you reply to my words that you have edited then you are dishonest. That is not how people debate. Watch the debate on TV tonight. You will not see anyone interrupting a speaker to make a point until they have finished speaking.

You're weak and dishonest. You also whine a lot. Are all liberals whiners or are all whiners liberals?

2 Replies

@Renaldo Dubois,

Renaldo Dubois wrote:

When you reply to my words that you have edited then you are dishonest. That is not how people debate. Watch the debate on TV tonight. You will not see anyone interrupting a speaker to make a point until they have finished speaking.

You're weak and dishonest. You also whine a lot. Are all liberals whiners or are all whiners liberals?

I see. So when you post partial quotes, does that make you dishonest?
Or are you somehow exempt from this idiotic standard of yours?

1 Reply

@Renaldo Dubois,

Quote:

You will not see anyone interrupting a speaker to make a point until they have finished speaking.

You don't watch much TV, do you?

O'Reilly interrupts Obama 48 times.

http://watching-tv.ew.com/2011/02/09/bill-oreilly-obama-smurfs-jimmy-kimmel-fox-news/

Bret Bair interrupts Obama continuously
http://www.aoltv.com/2010/03/18/bret-baier-interrupts-barack-obama-video/

Do you think you deserve more respect than the US President?

1 Reply

@parados,

Show us a partial quote that I am responsible for.

1 Reply

@parados,

Are you Bill O'Reilly now? Amazing. Grow up.

Why don't you admit the fact you need to take other people's words apart so you can make a point because you're not equipped to respond to an entire point. That makes you and your pals who do the same thing weak and inept. I can do it. Others can do it. For some strange reason you and your lefty pals need to take apart other's posts. Weakness.

1 Reply

@Renaldo Dubois,

Renaldo Dubois wrote:

Show us a partial quote that I am responsible for.

Here
http://able2know.org/topic/172875-4#post-4634565

Here
http://able2know.org/topic/172875-4#post-4634585

And Here
http://able2know.org/topic/172875-5#post-4634605

0 Replies

@Renaldo Dubois,

Renaldo Dubois wrote:

Are you Bill O'Reilly now?

No, I never said I was.

Quote:

Amazing.

yes, it is amazing how when I present evidence to refute your claim, you make me the issue.

Quote:

Grow up.

I did grow up. Perhaps you can too some day.

Quote:

Why don't you admit the fact you need to take other people's words apart so you can make a point because you're not equipped to respond to an entire point.

This would presuppose the idea that you make only one point in your posts. Is that what you are saying?

Quote:

That makes you and your pals who do the same thing weak and inept. I can do it. Others can do it. For some strange reason you and your lefty pals need to take apart other's posts. Weakness.

For some reason, you think when people respond point by point, they are destroying your argument simply by separating it into parts. That is hardly the case. They are taking your argument apart because it isn't a strong argument.

(That will probably go over your head.)

1 Reply

@parados,

So because Bill O'Reilly does it, it's okay for you to do it? When did you become an admirer of Bill O'Reilly? Do you have a crush on him also?

2 Replies

@Renaldo Dubois,

I was merely refuting your statement Renaldo.

Quote:

That is not how people debate.

Your statement was false because that is how people often debate.
In reality, people often interrupt others in debates.

The problem is, you have attempted to redefine "interruption". Interruptions during debates are when a speaker is prevented from completing his statement. Responding AFTER you have already posted it is NOT an interruption. It can't be one by any standard of interrupting during debate. You are not interrupted. Your statement is merely being deconstructed in order to respond to what others see as your points. That is not considered rude. It is considered a common practice in criticism.

1 Reply

@Renaldo Dubois,

I notice you completely ignored the 3 instances I cited of you failing to quote someone in their entirety.

Does that make you dishonest:
1. for failing to quote someone completely?
2. for failing to acknowledge that you are guilty of what you say is dishonesty.

1 Reply

An Example Of The New Civility

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know