georgeob1
 
  1  
Reply Sun 21 Aug, 2011 09:09 pm
@RexRed,
Hard to follow you argument. Many people in this country have worked very hard; saved for the future; and focused on the education of their children. Indeed this has been a consistently observable characteristic of many members of the successive waves of immigrants who came to theis country - Germans, Scotch Irish, Polish, Irish, Ashkenasi Jews from Central Europe, Iitalians, Chinese, Japanese, Vietnamese and recently central Americans. They settled the frontier and our wealth and to a large extent our wealth and power were built on their sweat and tears.

A cynic once said that the economic engine of this country is fuelled by hard working immigrants, but that it turns them into couch potatos in three generations.

Do you fault the Chinese for their work ethic? If it is as widespread and enduring as you say, how can we possibly compete with them?

History provides many examples of formerly rich and powerful states that fell into into poverty and servitude because the beneficiaries of the achievments of the early generations were squandered by subsequent ones on comfortable lives. Do you believe that we can escape that fate?
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Sun 21 Aug, 2011 09:50 pm
@georgeob1,
georgeob1 wrote:

Hard to follow you argument. Many people in this country have worked very hard; saved for the future; and focused on the education of their children. Indeed this has been a consistently observable characteristic of many members of the successive waves of immigrants who came to theis country - Germans, Scotch Irish, Polish, Irish, Ashkenasi Jews from Central Europe, Iitalians, Chinese, Japanese, Vietnamese and recently central Americans. They settled the frontier and our wealth and to a large extent our wealth and power were built on their sweat and tears.

A cynic once said that the economic engine of this country is fuelled by hard working immigrants, but that it turns them into couch potatos in three generations.

Do you fault the Chinese for their work ethic? If it is as widespread and enduring as you say, how can we possibly compete with them?

History provides many examples of formerly rich and powerful states that fell into into poverty and servitude because the beneficiaries of the achievments of the early generations were squandered by subsequent ones on comfortable lives. Do you believe that we can escape that fate?


I see corporate greed as being a bigger problem than couch potatoes and welfare states...
georgeob1
 
  1  
Reply Mon 22 Aug, 2011 08:57 am
@RexRed,
RexRed wrote:

I see corporate greed as being a bigger problem than couch potatoes and welfare states...


It appears to me that you are merely evading questions relating to contradictions in your earlier statements.

What is "corporate greed" anyway? Corporations exist to make a profit: if they don't they either shut down or are bought in a hostile takeover. That, of course, is merely Adam Smith's "invisible hand" directing the allocation of resources to those most capable of delivering high value for the cost involved. The net result is the benefit of all.

The alternatives of centrally manasged economies have delivered only inefficiency, poverty and the loss of individual freedom wherever they have been tried. China certainly did badly as long as they stuck with a Marxist centrally managed economy. Cuba and Venezuela don't appear to be doing very well economically either (never mind the loss of political freedon for their people).
RexRed
 
  2  
Reply Mon 22 Aug, 2011 02:17 pm
@georgeob1,
georgeob1 wrote:

RexRed wrote:

I see corporate greed as being a bigger problem than couch potatoes and welfare states...


It appears to me that you are merely evading questions relating to contradictions in your earlier statements.

What is "corporate greed" anyway? Corporations exist to make a profit: if they don't they either shut down or are bought in a hostile takeover. That, of course, is merely Adam Smith's "invisible hand" directing the allocation of resources to those most capable of delivering high value for the cost involved. The net result is the benefit of all.

The alternatives of centrally manasged economies have delivered only inefficiency, poverty and the loss of individual freedom wherever they have been tried. China certainly did badly as long as they stuck with a Marxist centrally managed economy. Cuba and Venezuela don't appear to be doing very well economically either (never mind the loss of political freedon for their people).



Making a disproportionate profit at the expense of the earth and your fellow human beings is corporate greed. Lobbying political factions against what is right so they can continue to profit is not only unethical but evil (love of money is the source of all evil). Scaring people with political and military reprisal so they will continue to act as slaves to this corporate machine is a reason for revolt.
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Mon 22 Aug, 2011 02:25 pm
While we are on the subject... a CEO sitting on their ass all day in an air conditioned office raking in millions while laborers sweat blood for pittance... Who exactly is the couch potato here?
0 Replies
 
georgeob1
 
  1  
Reply Mon 22 Aug, 2011 03:14 pm
@RexRed,
I think that you have very little experience and understanding of how the world really works, and even less about the reality behind the things you assert here.

RABEL222
 
  2  
Reply Mon 22 Aug, 2011 03:27 pm
@georgeob1,
Your right about not understanding the reality of life but wrong about who is confused. Your the one who dosent understand that the very rich are gitting so by screwing the common man and buying government.
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Thu 1 Sep, 2011 04:39 pm
Every one is pointing fingers and blaming each other for why the job market is not stable.

The root of the problem is something logistical. It has to do with minimum wage. I wonder if you averaged all of the global labor wages and came up with a minimum wage and then set that wage globally. Then the incentive to work would be balanced globally... But when you have pockets of disparity then you have corruption and no standards of labor civility that companies adhere to.

Also top wage earners (60-70% on up) should be taxed enough to at least add another half to what taxes the middle class pay. So the top echelon of society should match what the middle class pay collectively. Seems just... with the enormous wealth that accumulates, this wealth comes at the cost of the nation that "we the people" collectively own. Perhaps then we can address the very serious problems we face with our eroding environment and world hunger.

It seems minimum wage is a thing that strikes a chord at the very dignity of humanity.

Jobs will move where people can be exploited... If the "world" minimum wage was set high then all people could afford to live by the same/equal standard. When you work someone for pennies you can work them to death, why is it that when you pay them great salaries they lounge around and hardly seem to ever actually work.

If this trade has created a viable capitalistic market in many global areas the hope would be that this global competition would average out the currencies and labor markets would or will average out evenly. The bottom line is that profits will also level out, once profiteering is no longer a large part of the market design then jobs will return and stabilize. As long as these rich republican supporting companies can exploit these poor foreign labor work forces then profit will reign over social prosperity.

America needs to bite the bullet and put everything we have into self sustaining homegrown renewable energy. We are paying everything out in our energy consumption. We pay everything out and should be paying it in and investing in a strong renewable energy infrastructure.

http://www.livescience.com/5114-true-costs-renewable-energy.html

With these few energy solutions people's houses and even entire farms could become energy self sufficient to the point of actually selling surplus energy back to the electric company...
izzythepush
 
  0  
Reply Thu 1 Sep, 2011 04:46 pm
@RexRed,
RexRed wrote:

Jobs will move where people can be exploited... If the "world" minimum wage was set high then all people could afford to live by the same/equal standard.

Amen
0 Replies
 
georgeob1
 
  1  
Reply Thu 1 Sep, 2011 09:18 pm
@RexRed,
RexRed wrote:

Every one is pointing fingers and blaming each other for why the job market is not stable.

The root of the problem is something logistical. It has to do with minimum wage. I wonder if you averaged all of the global labor wages and came up with a minimum wage and then set that wage globally. Then the incentive to work would be balanced globally... But when you have pockets of disparity then you have corruption and no standards of labor civility that companies adhere to.
Perhaps you should write to all the world's leaders with your announcement that you have found a solution to the problem of prosperity and peace for the whole world - an international minimun wage law ! Some may accuse you of not understanding the meaning of Aesop's fable about the mice who found a solution to their eternal cat problem - belling the cat.

What government would enforce the minimum wage? What would you do about a country that tried to increase its wealth by lowering its wages and taking business from others? How would you deal with the certainty that prices everywhere would immediately rise proportionally to the increase in the minimum wage - thus leaving everyone where they started out. Would an international government caspable of enforcing such a universal wage not itself become a source of tyranny. Where would you find the Philosopher Kings to run it? Even Plato couldn't do that.

RexRed wrote:
Also top wage earners (60-70% on up) should be taxed enough to at least add another half to what taxes the middle class pay. So the top echelon of society should match what the middle class pay collectively. Seems just... with the enormous wealth that accumulates, this wealth comes at the cost of the nation that "we the people" collectively own. Perhaps then we can address the very serious problems we face with our eroding environment and world hunger.
We have better than that already. The top 30% of earners today pay a far higher share of income taxes than you call for here.

RexRed wrote:
Jobs will move where people can be exploited... If the "world" minimum wage was set high then all people could afford to live by the same/equal standard. When you work someone for pennies you can work them to death, why is it that when you pay them great salaries they lounge around and hardly seem to ever actually work.

If this trade has created a viable capitalistic market in many global areas the hope would be that this global competition would average out the currencies and labor markets would or will average out evenly. The bottom line is that profits will also level out, once profiteering is no longer a large part of the market design then jobs will return and stabilize. As long as these rich republican supporting companies can exploit these poor foreign labor work forces then profit will reign over social prosperity.
This may be your fantasy, but nothing in the known history of the world suggests that this would happen, or even if it did, would be sustained.

RexRed wrote:
America needs to bite the bullet and put everything we have into self sustaining homegrown renewable energy. We are paying everything out in our energy consumption. We pay everything out and should be paying it in and investing in a strong renewable energy infrastructure.

With these few energy solutions people's houses and even entire farms could become energy self sufficient to the point of actually selling surplus energy back to the electric company...


No one is so stupid and ignorant as one who doesn't acknowledge what he doesn't know or understand. You could start with a little history, and, for energy solutions, with the first & second laws of Thermodynamics.

However, I have little hope that you will do that. Dream on Walter Mitty !
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Fri 2 Sep, 2011 08:52 pm
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/44377745/ns/technology_and_science-the_new_york_times/
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  0  
Reply Thu 8 Sep, 2011 01:15 pm
http://blogs.hbr.org/haque/2011/09/was_marx_right.html
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 Sep, 2011 04:13 pm
0 Replies
 
Builder
 
  1  
Reply Mon 12 Sep, 2011 06:27 am
What I think (assume) is currently wrong with capitalism is that since globalisation, and the attendant inclusion of the communist nations, anyone with the required capital can usurp power according the girth of their purse.

How has that panned out over the last decade? Who's really calling the shots these days?
georgeob1
 
  1  
Reply Wed 14 Sep, 2011 12:07 am
@Builder,
That has been true throughout human history.
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  0  
Reply Wed 14 Sep, 2011 12:16 am
@RexRed,
RexRed wrote:
Is capitalism working anymore?
Capitalism is the free market,
affected by the laws of nature: the Law of Supply and Demand.

Thay work, if thay r not subverted by government.





David
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Thu 15 Sep, 2011 10:24 am
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-14927432
0 Replies
 
Josef cv
 
  -2  
Reply Thu 15 Sep, 2011 10:35 am
@RexRed,
So those big- business, capitalist, money-grubbing, slave-driving, billionaire, corporation fat-cats are the ones who put the communistic, liberal, income redistributing, Marxist, socialist, Che Guavara-loving Obama into office? Got you.
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Thu 15 Sep, 2011 11:31 am
@Josef cv,
Josef cv wrote:

So those big- business, capitalist, money-grubbing, slave-driving, billionaire, corporation fat-cats are the ones who put the communistic, liberal, income redistributing, Marxist, socialist, Che Guavara-loving Obama into office? Got you.


More like those big- business, capitalist, money-grubbing, slave-driving, billionaire, corporation fat-cats bought off the republican party to steal the incomes from the hard working, middle class, average, tax paying citizens.
Josef cv
 
  -2  
Reply Thu 15 Sep, 2011 11:46 am
@RexRed,
To whom do you think the pay-off was made? Was the money put into a trust for the 2012 elections? Who is now holding all that money? Inquiring minds want to know. Are you a dedicated conspiracist?
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.83 seconds on 12/22/2024 at 11:41:02