27
   

Rover's on Mars

 
 
Reply Sat 3 Jan, 2004 11:22 pm
Right now there's not much to link to. It hit Mars and sent back a strong signal. Jubilation at NASA.
 
satt fs
 
  1  
Reply Sat 3 Jan, 2004 11:24 pm
"NASA officials will be holding a post-landing press conference at 12:30 a.m. EST."
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sun 4 Jan, 2004 12:05 am
YAY!!!!!!!
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Sun 4 Jan, 2004 12:15 am
Yahoo story of the landing.
0 Replies
 
colorbook
 
  2  
Reply Sun 4 Jan, 2004 12:19 am
Great edgar! I've been watching live coverage and waiting to hear more details.
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Sun 4 Jan, 2004 10:46 am
Link to govts' mars rovers site,
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Sun 4 Jan, 2004 12:23 pm
Great achievement for American know how and ability. However, aside from satisfying mans insatiable need to know what benefits can be realized that would justify the gazilions of dollars spent on projects such as these? Considering the problems that are faced by people on the planet we inhabit on a daily basis couldn''t the funds have been better spent. In any event what could possibly be so important in knowing whether Mars had ever supported life?
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Sun 4 Jan, 2004 12:36 pm
I believe man has a secret desire to revitalize Mars and put colonies there. Besides, the amount they spend is paltry compared to the war machine.
0 Replies
 
user
 
  1  
Reply Sun 4 Jan, 2004 12:50 pm
Uuuh did ya have a look at nasa.gov already?
Looks like the folks out there need reality to look like a TV-show in order to make them be interested in it.

You should call your next war in Iran, Syria or North Korea "Battlematch3k" - I'm sure that'll finally make you independet from those freakin UN-fags as it'll give you a lot more supporters...I mean who could withstand those flashy colors and...uh uh those cool sounds when moving over a button...gotta become a NASA-scientist too
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Sun 4 Jan, 2004 12:59 pm
Edgar
Paltry, have you any idea regarding the actual costs that went into making this mission and others like it a success?
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Sun 4 Jan, 2004 01:09 pm
Sure. But, the war people dwarf that, and in fact when NASA projects have a military application, the costs overlap, sort of.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Sun 4 Jan, 2004 01:54 pm
In the early 70's, Sagan noted in one of his books, that the Pioneer missions to Mars cost less than the cost overruns on the F-16. The space program has given us new biometric knowledge and tools, new medical equipment and treatment regimes, pocket calculators, home computers, new ceramics, new conductors . . . and lots and lots of new jobs. For the money we spend on the space program, if the Defense Department got the same bang for the buck that NASA does, we'd have sent a couple of battalions of MP's to Afghanistan and a Marine regiment to Iraq.

I believe that teraforming Mars is possible. Whether or not it were desireable is for someone other than me to consider. I believe that "rule out any surviving aboriginal life" would almost be a necessity, as i'm certain there would wide-spread and vocal "enrironmental" opposition to the scheme, whether or not life were present. Assuring that we would not be destroying the native life forms (were there any) would likely, without pressing need on Earth, be a necessity. If the human race decided to terraform Mars, and the necessary resources in terms of vehicles and equipment were available, i have an excellent and cheap plan to bring water ice, CO2 ice, nitrogen ice, etc., from the accretion ring around Saturn. Then ya just slam them suckers into the Martian poles, and pray for rain.
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Sun 4 Jan, 2004 02:13 pm
I am holding out a belief there may be microscopic life somewhere on Mars. If true, that would make it potentially dangerous enough to keep real humans home.
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Sun 4 Jan, 2004 02:40 pm
I forget which of the astronauts said
'All of the money spent on the space program was spent here on earth"
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Sun 4 Jan, 2004 02:42 pm
Keep the ETs poor and barefoot.
0 Replies
 
Acquiunk
 
  2  
Reply Sun 4 Jan, 2004 03:15 pm
What is the use of the expense of space exploration? Science, in part, works on the basis of comparison. That is understanding one phonomania by comparing it with other,related phonomania. So to understand what earth is like, it helps to understand what it is not like. Mars exploration is pat of that comparative effort. At minimum, it expands our intellectual horizon and give us a deeper understanding of what we are. It is hard to put a price tag on that but we have been doing it now for about 500 years, and we certainly do not live like we did 500 years ago.
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Sun 4 Jan, 2004 03:26 pm
Space exploration is a noble cause. I am not educated enough in the field to give a lot of fancy reasons, but, it is part of nature for life to expand into every available space. Science from the effort benefits all of us and the rise in understanding of ourselves and our universe is incalculable, as has been pointed out by setanta and acquiunk. If we need to cut the budget I would look to a bloated military.
0 Replies
 
akaMechsmith
 
  1  
Reply Sun 4 Jan, 2004 05:11 pm
Edgar,

Tain't just the military is bloated as the whole Foggy Bottom area generally.

Figured on a costs per unit of work basis the whole bureaucracy could not possibly compete in a real world. There may be a few exceptions but that could be a good subject for another thread.

I read somewhere that it cost the average american about a quarter to put a man on the moon. Heck; I spend more than that to mail my check to the electric company Exclamation .


au1929, What would you rather do with the surplus. We already grow enough tomatoes to provide ketchup to anyone who can use it. We are sending more people to college than are able to use the knowledge. We can easily provide 2000 calories a day to every single human being. If it wasn't for certain intrangencies amongst us every human could have all his needs met peacefully and also would have the ability to tend to most of his wants. All that is necessary is to convince the preachers and politicians, and the "mechanics and engineers" Very Happy amongst us will get the job done.
0 Replies
 
akaMechsmith
 
  1  
Reply Sun 4 Jan, 2004 05:14 pm
Perhaps you'd like to use the surplus labor to build some more Cathedrals or Pyramids.

Would that be a more intelligent use for the excess labor Question Question
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Sun 4 Jan, 2004 05:30 pm
aka
Yep. I believe that if they cut NASA the money saved would go into military industrial porkbarrel uses, benefiting nobody.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Propeller in Mars image - Discussion by gungasnake
EEEK! BEWARE Martian Spiders!! - Discussion by tsarstepan
Successful New Landing on Mars - Discussion by edgarblythe
Life on Mars - Discussion by gungasnake
NASA's Next Steps in the Journey to Mars - Discussion by OregonFlyBy
LIVELY MARS - Discussion by Setanta
NASA image: clear/obvious pyramid - Discussion by gungasnake
Foundations of Mars - Discussion by gungasnake
Mars bunker and sphinx - Discussion by gungasnake
India's Mars Orbiter Spacecraft - Discussion by Brandon9000
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Rover's on Mars
Copyright © 2017 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 09/19/2017 at 12:53:04