0
   

this =?

 
 
Reply Thu 21 Apr, 2011 09:32 am

Context (the complete context is in the article of Nature, click the link at the bottom):
The IGERT scheme shows how appropriate reward structures can drive change. Governments and funding agencies should require educational institutions to release figures showing how many of their PhD students complete the course, and how many go on to find employment and where, and should award some proportion of funding accordingly. This would also help prospective students to select a good course, and force worse-performing programmes to shape up or close.

Until any of this becomes commonplace, it is up to prospective graduate students to enter a science PhD with their eyes open to the opportunities — or lack of them — at the end. Not all mushrooms grow best in the dark.

Link:
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v472/n7343/full/472259b.html

  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Question • Score: 0 • Views: 543 • Replies: 7
No top replies

 
JPB
 
  1  
Reply Thu 21 Apr, 2011 09:44 am
@oristarA,
this = figures showing how many of their PhD students complete the course, and how many go on to find employment and where
oristarA
 
  1  
Reply Thu 21 Apr, 2011 09:55 am
@JPB,
JPB wrote:

this = figures showing how many of their PhD students complete the course, and how many go on to find employment and where


That's it.

Why not these?
InfraBlue
 
  1  
Reply Thu 21 Apr, 2011 10:09 am
The writer considers that both the release of figures showing rates of PHD completion, and how many of these doctors go on to find work and where is a singular aggregate requirement.
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Thu 21 Apr, 2011 10:22 am
@oristarA,
There are times when we don't schmoosh these things into a singular as described by Infra. Then we might say things like,


Doing these things [I've described], ... .
PUNKEY
 
  1  
Reply Thu 21 Apr, 2011 12:31 pm
this = requirement of (2) things
oristarA
 
  1  
Reply Thu 21 Apr, 2011 08:06 pm
@JTT,
Thank you.

schmoosh is pronounced as [skmu:ʃ]?

And it means smash expressed in a humorous way?
0 Replies
 
oristarA
 
  1  
Reply Thu 21 Apr, 2011 08:07 pm
@PUNKEY,
PUNKEY wrote:

this = requirement of (2) things

Thanks
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

deal - Question by WBYeats
Let pupils abandon spelling rules, says academic - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Please, I need help. - Question by imsak
Is this sentence grammatically correct? - Question by Sydney-Strock
"come from" - Question by mcook
concentrated - Question by WBYeats
 
  1. Forums
  2. » this =?
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.07 seconds on 05/05/2024 at 06:32:15