0
   

PhD spots = ?

 
 
Reply Thu 21 Apr, 2011 08:36 am
Context:

Something needs to change — but what? Ideally, the system would produce high-quality PhD holders well matched to the attractive careers on offer. Yet many academics are reluctant to rock the boat as long as they are rewarded with grants (which pay for cheap PhD students) and publications (produced by their cheap PhD students). So are universities, which often receive government subsidies to fill their PhD spots.

More:

http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v472/n7343/full/472259b.html

  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Question • Score: 0 • Views: 631 • Replies: 8
No top replies

 
JPB
 
  1  
Reply Thu 21 Apr, 2011 08:39 am
@oristarA,
Openings on staff at universities filled by PhDs.
0 Replies
 
dadpad
 
  1  
Reply Thu 21 Apr, 2011 08:40 am
Spots = Work or job vacancies.
0 Replies
 
oristarA
 
  1  
Reply Thu 21 Apr, 2011 08:54 am
Thank you both.

Here is something that I am not very sure:

Quote:
Yet many academics are reluctant to rock the boat as long as they are rewarded with grants (which pay for cheap PhD students) and publications (produced by their cheap PhD students).


1) academics = scholars already having held key positions?

2) "which pay for cheap PhD students" ==>>> the scholars actually employed the cheap PhD students to do work for them, and pay the students with a very samll part of their grants?

3) publications (produced by their cheap PhD students) ===>> the students write articles (publications) for the scholars?
oristarA
 
  1  
Reply Thu 21 Apr, 2011 09:08 am
@oristarA,
It's a bit lengthy.

I supposed I've got it right. Razz
JPB
 
  1  
Reply Thu 21 Apr, 2011 09:09 am
@oristarA,
Yes, you've got it.
oristarA
 
  1  
Reply Thu 21 Apr, 2011 09:10 am
@JPB,
Thank you.
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Thu 21 Apr, 2011 10:28 am
@oristarA,
Here is something that I am not very sure of:

================

academics = scholars already having held key positions?

This, underlined, Ori, sounds like these scholars have moved on, that they no longer hold those positions. I think your intent is to say that they now hold the positions.

academics = scholars already holding key positions?
oristarA
 
  1  
Reply Thu 21 Apr, 2011 08:03 pm
@JTT,
JTT wrote:

Here is something that I am not very sure of:

================

academics = scholars already having held key positions?

This, underlined, Ori, sounds like these scholars have moved on, that they no longer hold those positions. I think your intent is to say that they now hold the positions.
academics = scholars already holding key positions?


Yes. Thank you.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

deal - Question by WBYeats
Let pupils abandon spelling rules, says academic - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Please, I need help. - Question by imsak
Is this sentence grammatically correct? - Question by Sydney-Strock
"come from" - Question by mcook
concentrated - Question by WBYeats
 
  1. Forums
  2. » PhD spots = ?
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/05/2024 at 07:16:17