0
   

Missing = disappearing and leaving no trace?

 
 
Reply Sun 3 Apr, 2011 09:24 am

Context:

The vesicles are reused several times. This results in the gradual degradation of the proteins they need for carrying out their function properly, which in turn affects the release of signaling substances. How the vesicles are kept operational during this recycling process was a mystery until now. Most types of cells have incorporated an extra step into this recycling process via special cell compartments called endosomes. In the endosomes, vesicle proteins are sorted to ensure optimal functioning of the recycled vesicles.

However, it was not clear whether this extra step was relevant for vesicle recycling in brain cells. Various studies seemed to demonstrate that it was in fact missing in brain cells.

More:
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/04/110401111356.htm
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Question • Score: 0 • Views: 753 • Replies: 2
No top replies

 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Mon 4 Apr, 2011 05:00 am
No, it means the extra step in the vesicle recycling process was missing in brain cells. That doesn't mean it disappeared, it means it was never there. Missing in the sense of being absent, not in the sense of disappearing.
oristarA
 
  1  
Reply Thu 7 Apr, 2011 09:02 am
@Setanta,
Thanks
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

deal - Question by WBYeats
Let pupils abandon spelling rules, says academic - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Please, I need help. - Question by imsak
Is this sentence grammatically correct? - Question by Sydney-Strock
"come from" - Question by mcook
concentrated - Question by WBYeats
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Missing = disappearing and leaving no trace?
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 04/27/2024 at 11:51:30